Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.
暂无分享,去创建一个
G Ardine de Wit | G. D. de Wit | R. Prenger | Rilana Prenger | Matthijs M Versteegh | Karin M Vermeulen | Silvia M A A Evers | Elly A Stolk | G. D. de Wit | Matthijs M Versteegh | Karin M Vermeulen | Silvia M A A Evers | Elly A Stolk | Matthijs M. Versteegh | G. de Wit
[1] Mark Oppe,et al. Multinational Evidence of the Applicability and Robustness of Discrete Choice Modeling for Deriving EQ-5D-5L Health-State Values , 2014, Medical care.
[2] A. Tsuchiya,et al. Protocols for Time Tradeoff Valuations of Health States Worse than Dead: A Literature Review , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[3] Mark Oppe,et al. Lead versus lag time trade-off variants: does it make any difference? , 2013 .
[4] Nan Luo,et al. The effects of lead time and visual aids in TTO valuation: a study of the EQ-VT framework , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[5] M. Versteegh,et al. Condition-specific preference-based measures: benefit or burden? , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[6] J. Severens,et al. Utilities of the EQ-5D , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.
[7] C. Gudex,et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study , 2012, Quality of Life Research.
[8] Mark Oppe,et al. Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[9] A Simon Pickard,et al. Psychometric Comparison of the Standard EQ-5D to a 5 Level Version in Cancer Patients , 2007, Medical care.
[10] A Simon Pickard,et al. Evaluating Equivalency Between Response Systems: Application of the Rasch Model to a 3-Level and 5-Level EQ-5D , 2007, Medical care.
[11] Mark Oppe,et al. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[12] Paul F. M. Krabbe,et al. The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[13] M. Versteegh,et al. Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[14] P. Stalmeier,et al. The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. , 2006, Health economics.
[15] J. Brazier,et al. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. , 2004, Health economics.
[16] Mark Oppe,et al. One-to-one versus group setting for conducting computer-assisted TTO studies: findings from pilot studies in England and the Netherlands , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[17] G. Bonsel,et al. Quantification of the level descriptors for the standard EQ-5D three-level system and a five-level version according to two methods , 2008, Quality of Life Research.
[18] Stephen Joel Coons,et al. US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.
[19] P. Dolan. Modelling valuations for health states , 1997 .
[20] N. Devlin,et al. Time to tweak the TTO: results from a comparison of alternative specifications of the TTO , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[21] Michael Herdman,et al. Dealing with the health state ‘dead’ when using discrete choice experiments to obtain values for EQ-5D-5L heath states , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[22] Julie Ratcliffe,et al. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: an assessment of the practicality and validity of the child health utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[23] G. Bonsel,et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.
[24] Murtuza Bharmal,et al. Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. , 2006, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[25] Mark Oppe,et al. Introducing the composite time trade-off: a test of feasibility and face validity , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[26] G. Bonsel,et al. Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.