Consequences of space sharing on individual phenotypes in the New Zealand hihi

In heterogeneous habitats, individuals sharing a larger part of their home-range are also likely to live in a very similar environment. This ‘common environment’ effect can generate phenotypic similarities between neighbours and lead to the structuring of phenotypes through the habitat. In this study, we used an intensely monitored population of hihi (or stitchbird, Notiomystis cincta ) from New Zealand, to assess whether home-range overlap and genetic relatedness between birds could generate phenotypic resemblance for a wide panel of morphological and life-history traits. Using a multiple-matrix animal model approach to partition the phenotypic variance present in the population, we included a spatial matrix measuring home range overlap between birds and estimated the proportion of variance attributable to space sharing. We detected a clear contribution of space sharing to the overall phenotypic similarity for two traits: hatchling mass and laying date. We also confirmed the very low estimates of genetic heritability already found for this species. These results suggest that models including space sharing can offer further insight into the determinants of individual differences in phenotype. In particular, the spatial matrix helps to capture fine-scale variation of the environment that classic animal models would potentially miss or miss-assign. In this species, results also suggest that small but significant genetic heritability estimates are not upwardly biased by clustering of close relatives in space.

[1]  A. Bhattacharyya On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions , 1943 .

[2]  W. H. Burt Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[3]  G. Orians,et al.  Spacing Patterns in Mobile Animals , 1970 .

[4]  C. R. Henderson SIRE EVALUATION AND GENETIC TRENDS , 1973 .

[5]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  A spectral method for confidence interval generation and run length control in simulations , 1981, CACM.

[6]  D. Falconer Introduction to quantitative genetics. 1. ed. , 1984 .

[7]  R. Lande,et al.  GENOTYPE‐ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  J. Blondel,et al.  Habitat Heterogeneity and Life-History Variation of Mediterranean Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus) , 1993 .

[9]  K. Cowles,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis software for Gibbs sampling output , 1995 .

[10]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid : the roe deer , 1996 .

[11]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Copying and Mate Choice , 1996 .

[12]  C. Heyes,et al.  Social learning in animals : the roots of culture , 1996 .

[13]  R. Frankham Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn): by Douglas S. Falconer and Trudy F.C. Mackay Longman, 1996. £24.99 pbk (xv and 464 pages) ISBN 0582 24302 5 , 1996 .

[14]  Humphrey Q. P. Crick,et al.  Climate change related to egg-laying trends , 1999, Nature.

[15]  J. Ewen,et al.  Male provisioning is negatively correlated with attempted extrapair copulation frequency in the stitchbird (or hihi) , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Anurag A. Agrawal,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity in the Interactions and Evolution of Species , 2001, Science.

[17]  Gw Dutkowski,et al.  Analysis of early tree height in forest genetic trials is enhanced by including a spatially correlated residual , 2001 .

[18]  R. McCleery,et al.  Effects of spatial autocorrelation, natal philopatry and phenotypic plasticity on the heritability of laying date , 2002 .

[19]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Public Information and Breeding Habitat Selection in a Wild Bird Population , 2002, Science.

[20]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[21]  I. Coolen,et al.  Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  L. Kruuk Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model". , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  K. Laland Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[24]  J. Ewen,et al.  Extra-pair copulation and paternity defense in the hihi (or stitchbird) Notiomystis cincta , 2004 .

[25]  JOHN FIEBERG,et al.  QUANTIFYING HOME-RANGE OVERLAP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE UTILIZATION DISTRIBUTION , 2005 .

[26]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[27]  Sandro Lovari,et al.  Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[28]  M. Carrete,et al.  Components of breeding performance in two competing species: habitat heterogeneity, individual quality and density‐dependence , 2006 .

[29]  M. Plummer,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC , 2006 .

[30]  L. Kruuk,et al.  How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[31]  D. Nussey,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[32]  F Mondada,et al.  Social Integration of Robots into Groups of Cockroaches to Control Self-Organized Choices , 2007, Science.

[33]  M. Nowakowska,et al.  Habitat and Annual Variation in Arthropod Abundance Affects Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus Reproduction , 2007 .

[34]  F. Champagne Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care , 2008, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.

[35]  C. Perrins Tits and their caterpillar food supply , 2008 .

[36]  J. Fryxell,et al.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[37]  J. Ewen,et al.  Characterization of microsatellite loci In The hihi Notiomystis cincta (Notiomystidae, Aves) , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[38]  Saren Starbridge Think Like an Island: New Zealand's Zealandia Karori Sanctuary , 2009 .

[39]  Andrew O. Finley,et al.  Hierarchical Spatial Process Models for Multiple Traits in Large Genetic Trials , 2010, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[40]  Erik Postma,et al.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[41]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models , 2010 .

[42]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[43]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[44]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  SHARED SPATIAL EFFECTS ON QUANTITATIVE GENETIC PARAMETERS: ACCOUNTING FOR SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION AND HOME RANGE OVERLAP REDUCES ESTIMATES OF HERITABILITY IN WILD RED DEER , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  A. Chauvenet,et al.  Giving hihi a helping hand: assessment of alternative rearing diets in food supplemented populations of an endangered bird , 2013 .

[46]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  Comparing parent–offspring regression with frequentist and Bayesian animal models to estimate heritability in wild populations: a simulation study for Gaussian and binary traits , 2013 .

[47]  E. Cortés‐Jacinto,et al.  Effect of temperature on weight increase, survival, and thermal preference of juvenile redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus , 2013 .

[48]  Evolution of extreme-mating behaviour: patterns of extrapair paternity in a species with forced extrapair copulation , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[49]  Jinlian Wang,et al.  A simulation module in the computer program colony for sibship and parentage analysis , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[50]  F. Schenkel,et al.  Linear and Poisson models for genetic evaluation of tick resistance in cross-bred Hereford x Nellore cattle. , 2013, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[51]  J. Slate,et al.  Genomic dissection of variation in clutch size and egg mass in a wild great tit (Parus major) population , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[52]  Marco Geraci,et al.  Linear Quantile Mixed Models: The lqmm Package for Laplace Quantile Regression , 2014 .

[53]  B. Doligez,et al.  Bayesian approaches to the quantitative genetic analysis of natural populations , 2014 .

[54]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations: a comparison of pedigree and genomic approaches , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[55]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[56]  J. Ewen,et al.  Determinants of male floating behaviour and floater reproduction in a threatened population of the hihi (Notiomystis cincta) , 2015, Evolutionary applications.

[57]  R. Germain,et al.  Direct and indirect genetic and fine-scale location effects on breeding date in song sparrows. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[58]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  General Methods for Evolutionary Quantitative Genetic Inference from Generalized Mixed Models , 2016, Genetics.

[59]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Accounting for female space sharing in St. Kilda Soay sheep (Ovis aries) results in little change in heritability estimates , 2017, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[60]  M. Cant,et al.  Decoupling of Genetic and Cultural Inheritance in a Wild Mammal , 2018, Current Biology.

[61]  D. Coltman,et al.  Heritability of body size in the polar bears of Western Hudson Bay , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[62]  A. Charmantier,et al.  Great tits and the city: Distribution of genomic diversity and gene–environment associations along an urbanization gradient , 2017, Evolutionary applications.

[63]  B. Pujol,et al.  A guide to using a multiple-matrix animal model to disentangle genetic and nongenetic causes of phenotypic variance , 2018, bioRxiv.

[64]  R. Thorogood,et al.  Older and wiser? Age differences in foraging and learning by an endangered passerine , 2018, Behavioural Processes.

[65]  P. Villemereuil Quantitative genetic methods depending on the nature of the phenotypic trait , 2018 .

[66]  J. Ewen,et al.  Little Adaptive Potential in a Threatened Passerine Bird , 2019, Current Biology.

[67]  J. Ewen,et al.  Can threatened species adapt in a restored habitat? No expected evolutionary response in lay date for the New Zealand hihi , 2018, Evolutionary applications.

[68]  M. McCready,et al.  Time Spent With Parents Varies With Early-Life Condition, but Does Not Predict Survival or Sociality of Juvenile Hihi , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..