Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load

Where and what we attend to is not only determined by our current goals but also by what we have encountered in the past. Recent studies have shown that people learn to extract statistical regularities in the environment resulting in attentional suppression of high-probability distractor locations, effectively reducing capture by a distractor. Here, we asked whether this statistical learning is dependent on working memory resources. The additional singleton task in which one location was more likely to contain a distractor was combined with a concurrent visual working memory task (Experiment 1 ) and a spatial working memory task (Experiment 2 ). The result showed that learning to suppress this high-probability location was not at all affected by working memory load. We conclude that learning to suppress a location is an implicit and automatic process that does not rely on visual or spatial working memory capacity, nor on executive control resources. We speculate that extracting regularities from the environment likely relies on long-term memory processes.

[1]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search , 2019, bioRxiv.

[2]  M. Chun,et al.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[4]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[6]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional; A Reply to Commentaries , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[7]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Contextual cueing under working memory load: Selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[11]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Michael Zehetleitner,et al.  Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[14]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The effects of a task-irrelevant visual event on spatial working memory , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Yuhong V Jiang,et al.  Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[20]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial working memory effects in early visual cortex , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  M. Chun,et al.  Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Neural Evidence of Statistical Learning: Efficient Detection of Visual Regularities Without Awareness , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working memory and executive control. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  J. Jonides,et al.  Rehearsal in spatial working memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Interactions between working memory, attention and eye movements. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[26]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[27]  N. Lavie,et al.  The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Leonardo Chelazzi,et al.  Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering , 2017, Cortex.

[29]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[30]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  B. Postle,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Laurent Itti,et al.  An Integrated Model of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention for Optimizing Detection Speed , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[33]  B. Postle Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain , 2006, Neuroscience.

[34]  Yuhong V Jiang,et al.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[36]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[37]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Attention on our mind: the role of spatial attention in visual working memory. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[38]  Bryan R Burnham,et al.  Components of working memory and visual selective attention. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.