Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jan Theeuwes | Ya Gao | J. Theeuwes | Ya Gao
[1] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search , 2019, bioRxiv.
[2] M. Chun,et al. Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[3] Jan Theeuwes,et al. OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[4] J. Jonides,et al. Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[5] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[6] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional; A Reply to Commentaries , 2018, Journal of cognition.
[7] J. Theeuwes,et al. Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[8] A. Nobre,et al. Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[9] Andrew R. A. Conway,et al. On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.
[10] Stefan Pollmann,et al. Contextual cueing under working memory load: Selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[11] J. Wolfe,et al. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] Steven J. Luck,et al. The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[13] Michael Zehetleitner,et al. Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[14] J. Theeuwes,et al. The effects of a task-irrelevant visual event on spatial working memory , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[15] M. Chun,et al. Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.
[16] Yuhong V Jiang,et al. Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] J. Theeuwes. Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[18] G. Woodman,et al. Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[19] Jan Theeuwes,et al. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[20] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Spatial working memory effects in early visual cortex , 2010, Brain and Cognition.
[21] M. Chun,et al. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[22] Marvin M. Chun,et al. Neural Evidence of Statistical Learning: Efficient Detection of Visual Regularities Without Awareness , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[23] A. Baddeley,et al. Working memory and executive control. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[24] J. Jonides,et al. Rehearsal in spatial working memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[25] J. Theeuwes,et al. Interactions between working memory, attention and eye movements. , 2009, Acta psychologica.
[26] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.
[27] N. Lavie,et al. The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[28] Leonardo Chelazzi,et al. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering , 2017, Cortex.
[29] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[30] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] B. Postle,et al. The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.
[32] Laurent Itti,et al. An Integrated Model of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention for Optimizing Detection Speed , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).
[33] B. Postle. Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain , 2006, Neuroscience.
[34] Yuhong V Jiang,et al. Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[35] Anna Schubö,et al. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[36] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional , 2018, Journal of cognition.
[37] D. E. Irwin,et al. Attention on our mind: the role of spatial attention in visual working memory. , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[38] Bryan R Burnham,et al. Components of working memory and visual selective attention. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[39] J. Theeuwes. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.