Compressive behaviour of closed-cell aluminium foams at high strain rates

Abstract It has been well established that ALPORAS® foams is a strain rate sensitive material. However, the strain rate effect is not well quantified as it is not unusual for strain rate to vary during high speed compression. Moreover, according to previous research, aluminium foams, especially ALPORAS® foams, behave differently at low and high strain rates. Therefore, different plastic deformation mechanisms are expected for low and high strain rate loadings as a result of micro-inertia of cell walls. In this paper, the strain rate effect on the energy dissipation capacity of ALPORAS® foam was investigated experimentally by using a High Rate Instron Test System, with cross-head speed up to 10 m/s. The compressive tests were conducted over strain rates in the range of 1 × 10−3 to 2.2 × 102 s−1, with each test being at a fairly constant strain rate. An energy efficiency method was adopted to obtain the densification strain and plateau stress. The effect of strain rate and the foam density was well presented by empirical constitutive models. The experimental data were also discussed with reference to the recent results by other researchers but with different range of strain rates. An attempt has been made to qualitatively explain the observed decrease of densification strain with strain rate.

[1]  H. Kohzu,et al.  Enhancement of energy absorption in a closed-cell aluminum by the modification of cellular structures , 1999 .

[2]  Hilary Bart-Smith,et al.  Experimental analysis of deformation mechanisms in a closed-cell aluminum alloy foam , 2000 .

[3]  Guowei Ma,et al.  Modeling loading rate effect on crushing stress of metallic cellular materials , 2009 .

[4]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Dynamic compressive strength properties of aluminium foams. Part II—‘shock’ theory and comparison with experimental data and numerical models , 2005 .

[5]  Tongxi Yu,et al.  Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials , 2003 .

[6]  M. Hoffman,et al.  Mechanical behaviour and energy absorption of closed-cell aluminium foam panels in uniaxial compression , 2009 .

[7]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Aluminum foams produced by liquid-state processes , 1998 .

[8]  James Lankford,et al.  High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminium foams , 2000 .

[9]  U. Ramamurty,et al.  Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam , 2000 .

[10]  L. S. Ong,et al.  Dynamic indentation and penetration of aluminium foams , 2008 .

[11]  Kenji Higashi,et al.  Compressive response of a closed-cell aluminum foam at high strain rate , 2006 .

[12]  M. Ashby,et al.  Metal Foams: A Design Guide , 2000 .

[13]  Ki-Ju Kang,et al.  Cell wall mechanical properties of closed-cell Al foam , 2009 .

[14]  Elias Siores,et al.  Compressive behaviour of aluminium foams at low and medium strain rates , 2002 .

[15]  J. Harrigan,et al.  Compressive Strain at the Onset of Densification of Cellular Solids , 2006 .

[16]  M. Ashby,et al.  Uniaxial stress–strain behaviour of aluminium alloy foams , 1999 .

[17]  G. Lu,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Porous Materials , 1999 .