A multiple electrode scheme for optimal non-invasive electrical stimulation

Transcranial electrical stimulation involves the delivery of weak electrical currents to the brain via scalp electrodes to elicit neuromodulatory effects. The current is conventionally passed through two large electrodes resulting in diffused electric fields. In this paper, we propose a novel paradigm in which multiple small electrodes with independent current controls are systematically optimized to yield targeted and effective stimulation under safety constraints. We employ the finite element method, in conjunction with a magnetic resonance imagery based model of the human head, to formulate a linear system relating the applied scalp current to the resulting electric field. Optimization techniques are then applied to derive stimulation parameters which maximize either intensity or focality at the target location. Results demonstrate that the optimal electrode configuration is strongly dependent on both the desired field orientation and the optimization criterion. The proposed scheme yields improvements of 98% in target intensity and 80% in focality compared to the conventional two-electrode montage. Additionally, the presented framework effectively optimizes electrode placement in the classical bipolar configuration, which is useful if only a single channel current source is available. Consequently, the proposed scheme promises to deliver increased efficacy and improved patient safety to clinical settings in which the target site is identified by a clinician.

[1]  B.D. Van Veen,et al.  Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering , 1988, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[2]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  Determination of optimal electrode positions for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[4]  Won Hee Lee,et al.  Reduced spatial focality of electrical field in tDCS with ring electrodes due to tissue anisotropy , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[5]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[6]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Using Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation to Treat Stroke Patients With Aphasia , 2010, Stroke.

[7]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Go-no-go task performance improvement after anodal transcranial DC stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression. , 2007, Journal of affective disorders.

[8]  N. T. Hoai-Phuong,et al.  Optimization under Composite Monotonic Constraints and Constrained Optimization over the Efficient Set , 2006 .

[9]  S. Sato,et al.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals , 2005, Neurology.

[10]  R. Sadleir,et al.  Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri – precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation : Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2010 .

[13]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  A Controlled Clinical Trial of Cathodal DC Polarization in Patients with Refractory Epilepsy , 2006, Epilepsia.

[14]  C. Im,et al.  A novel array-type transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) system for accurate focusing on targeted brain regions , 2010, Digests of the 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation.

[15]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Disciplined Convex Programming , 2006 .

[16]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  D. Griffiths Introduction to Electrodynamics , 2017 .

[19]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  D. Logan A First Course in the Finite Element Method , 2001 .

[22]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.