Twist and Shout: Audible Facing Angles and Dynamic Rotation

In 2 experiments, blindfolded listeners estimated the facing direction of a sound source from 2 different listening distances. In Experiment 1, listeners estimated the stationary facing angle of a loudspeaker that projected a speech stimulus while facing 1 of 8 different directions. In Experiment 2, the loudspeaker sounded while rotating and also while stationary at its terminal orientation. Listeners then made judgments of the final facing angle. Although performance fell short of that typically found in minimum audible angle experiments, listeners made relatively accurate estimates of loudspeaker orientation and showed a significant advantage when dynamic rotation information was available. Listeners were also significantly better at perceiving facing angles when closer to the source and when the loudspeaker was directly facing the listener (0�). The enhanced sensitivity to this egocentric source orientation may be the result of the use of redundant binaural and monaural information at a facing angle of 0�. Human listeners tend to visually orient toward the source of speech as well as project speech directionally toward the intended recipient of the message. Thus, sensitivity to static and dynamic audible facing angles may have implications for complex perception-action relations that are instrumental in activities such as communication and navigation.

[1]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Creating a unified representation of visual and auditory space in the brain. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  C. Munn Birds that ‘cry wolf’ , 1986, Nature.

[3]  Paul Bertelson,et al.  Spatial constraints on attention to speech in the blind , 1987, Brain and Language.

[4]  J. Harris,et al.  Monaural-binaural minimum audible angles for a moving sound source. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  A. Bronkhorst Localization of real and virtual sound sources , 1995 .

[6]  Perrott Dr,et al.  Dynamic minimum audible angle: binaural spatial acuity with moving sound sources. , 1981 .

[7]  D. Perrott,et al.  Minimum Audible Movement Angle as a Function of the Azimuth and Elevation of the Source , 1992, Human factors.

[8]  R. Forget,et al.  EVALUATION OF TWO‐POINT DISCRIMINATION IN CHILDREN: RELIABILITY, EFFECTS OF PASSIVE DISPLACEMENT AND VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1996, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[10]  William W. Gaver What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[11]  D. Mershon,et al.  Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance , 1975 .

[12]  T. Anderson,et al.  Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments , 1997 .

[13]  D R Perrott,et al.  Dynamic minimum audible angle: binaural spatial acuity with moving sound sources. , 1981, The Journal of auditory research.

[14]  P A Cabe,et al.  Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filling. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Michael K. Russell Auditory Perception of Unimpeded Passage , 1999 .

[16]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  C S Watson,et al.  Auditory psychophysics and perception. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Donald H. Mershon,et al.  Toward the indirect measurement of perceived auditory distance , 1991 .

[19]  D R Perrott,et al.  Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  F. Biocca,et al.  Communication in the age of virtual reality , 1995 .

[21]  D Rosenblum Lawrence,et al.  Auditory Reachability: An Affordance Approach to the Perception of Sound Source Distance , 1996 .

[22]  Lawrence D. Rosenblum,et al.  Echolocating Distance by Moving and Stationary Listeners , 2000 .

[23]  Chandler Dw,et al.  Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity. , 1992 .

[24]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  An Acoustic Variable Specifying Time-to-Contact , 1991 .

[25]  M. Turvey,et al.  Hearing shape. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  J. Neuhoff,et al.  The audible facing angle , 2001 .

[27]  P. Sherman Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. , 1977, Science.

[28]  A. Mills On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[29]  S. Hopf,et al.  Behavioral responses to species‐specific warning calls in infant squirrel monkeys reared in social isolation , 1984, American journal of primatology.

[30]  Charles H. Brown THE MEASUREMENT OF VOCAL AMPLITUDE AND VOCAL RADIATION PATTERN IN BLUE MONKEYS AND GREY-CHEEKED MANGABEYS , 1989 .

[31]  A. D. Little,et al.  Spectral Content as a Cue to Perceived Auditory Distance , 1992, Perception.

[32]  G Turkewitz,et al.  Asymmetric headturning to speech and nonspeech in human newborns. , 1996, Developmental psychobiology.

[33]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Auditory distance perception in rooms , 1999, Nature.

[34]  D H Ashmead,et al.  Contribution of listeners' approaching motion to auditory distance perception. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  D W Grantham,et al.  Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  R. Caussé,et al.  The representation of auditory source characteristics: simple geometric form. , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  W H Warren,et al.  Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: a case study in ecological acoustics. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Loudness constancy with varying sound source distance , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  James A. Kleiss,et al.  Visual Scene Properties Relevant for Simulating Low-Altitude Flight: A Multidimensional Scaling Approach , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[40]  C. Carello,et al.  Perception of Object Length by Sound , 1998 .

[41]  L D Braida,et al.  Binaural pinna disparity: another auditory localization cue. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  P. Rochat,et al.  An account of the systematic error in judging what is reachable. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Mark T. Palmer,et al.  Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: mediating interpersonal relationships , 1995 .

[44]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Song transmission and auditory perception of distance in wood warblers (Parulinae) , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  Auditory localization in a free field using discrimination procedures. , 1987, The Journal of auditory research.