Each one of us has a particular way to behave before a conflict. We can assume a cooperative and collaborative attitude or we can behave in a more selfish or competitive way. Given our personality traits or our past experiences, each one has a tendency to behave more towards one or the other. Nonetheless, there are also external factors that influence our conflict handling style including the individuals we are conflicting with, our level of stress or fatigue, the level of escalation of the conflict or even the context or the setting in which it is being settled. Undeniably, the personal conflict resolution style of the parties is preponderant for the outcome of the conflict resolution process. The mediator, while knowing the style of each party, may better conduct the process, namely by pointing out and changing unrealistic, selfish or overly competitive behaviors. Traditionally, the mediator makes use of questionnaires to assess the conflict resolution style of the parties. In this chapter we detail a new view on the problem in which this knowledge is built in real-time, in a non-invasive way, based on the behavior evidenced by the parties during the conflict resolution process. The level of escalation of the conflict is also analyzed similarly, through the non-invasive analysis of the level of stress of the parties during the actual negotiation process. The relationship between stress and the personal conflict handling style is also studied.
[1]
L. Urwick,et al.
Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett
,
1942
.
[2]
John e. Jones.
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument
,
1976
.
[3]
M. Rahim,et al.
A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.
,
1983,
Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.
[4]
D. G. Pruitt.
Strategic Choice in Negotiation
,
1983
.
[5]
R. R. Blake,et al.
The Managerial Grid
,
1994
.
[6]
Timothy Kuhn,et al.
Do Conflict Management Styles Affect Group Decision Making? Evidence From a Longitudinal Field Study
,
2000
.
[7]
B. A. Jain,et al.
The effect of task complexity and conflict handling styles on computer-supported negotiations
,
2000,
Inf. Manag..
[8]
S. Simonovic,et al.
Conflict Resolution Support System: A Software for the Resolution of Conflicts in Water Resource Management
,
2003
.
[9]
J. Holt,et al.
Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: A meta-analysis
,
2005
.
[10]
T. Yiu.
A behavioral analysis of construction dispute negotiation
,
2005
.
[11]
Simone A. Ludwig.
Agent-Based Assistant for e-Negotiations
,
2008,
ISMIS.
[12]
Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.
Ambient Intelligence 2.0: Towards Synergetic Prosperity
,
2009,
AmI.
[13]
José Neves,et al.
Extracting Behavioural Patterns from a Negotiation Game
,
2013,
PAAMS.