Step Persistence in the Design of GALS Systems

In this paper we investigate the behaviour of GALS (Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous) systems in the context of VLSI circuits. The specification of a system is given in the form of a Petri net. Our aim is to re-design the system to optimise signal management, by grouping together concurrent events. Looking at the concurrent reachability graph of the given Petri net, we are interested in discovering events that appear in 'bundles', so that they all can be executed in one clock tick. The best candidates for bundles are sets of events that appear and re-appear over and over again in the same configurations, forming 'persistent' sets of events. Persistence was considered so far only in the context of sequential semantics. Here we introduce a notion of persistent steps and discuss their basic properties. We then introduce a formal definition of a bundle and propose an algorithm to prune the behaviour of a system, so that only bundle steps remain. The pruned reachability graph represents the behaviour of a re-engineered system, which in turn can be implemented in a new Petri net using the standard techniques of net synthesis. The proposed algorithm prunes reachability graphs of persistent and safe nets leaving bundles that represent maximally concurrent steps.

[1]  Kiyoshi Oguri,et al.  Asynchronous Circuit Design , 2001 .

[2]  Wolfgang Fichtner,et al.  GALS at ETH Zurich: success or failure? , 2006, 12th IEEE International Symposium on Asynchronous Circuits and Systems (ASYNC'06).

[3]  Philippe Darondeau,et al.  Decomposition Theorems for Bounded Persistent Petri Nets , 2008, Petri Nets.

[4]  Steve Furber,et al.  Principles of Asynchronous Circuit Design: A Systems Perspective , 2010 .

[5]  Philippe Darondeau,et al.  Separability in Persistent Petri Nets , 2011, Fundam. Informaticae.

[6]  Edward Ochmanski,et al.  Levels of Persistency in Place/Transition Nets , 2009, Fundam. Informaticae.

[7]  A Yakovlev.  Designing Self-Timed Systems , 1985 .

[8]  Robert M. Keller,et al.  A Fundamental Tehoerem of Asynchronous Parallel Computation , 1974, Sagamore Computer Conference.

[9]  Steven M. Nowick,et al.  An introduction to asynchronous circuit design , 1998 .

[10]  Edward L. Robertson,et al.  Properties of Conflict-Free and Persistent Petri Nets , 1978, JACM.

[11]  Yang Xu,et al.  The Future of Formal Methods and GALS Design , 2009, FMGALS@DATE.

[12]  Alexandre Yakovlev,et al.  Desynchronisation Technique Using Petri Nets , 2009, Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Luciano Lavagno,et al.  Logic Synthesis for Asynchronous Controllers and Interfaces , 2002 .

[14]  Daniel Marcos Chapiro,et al.  Globally-asynchronous locally-synchronous systems , 1985 .

[15]  Lukasz Mikulski,et al.  On Persistent Reachability in Petri Nets , 2010, ACSD/Petri Nets Workshops.

[16]  Alexandre Yakovlev,et al.  Modelling, analysis and synthesis of asynchronous control circuits using Petri nets , 1996, Integr..

[17]  Jens Sparsø,et al.  Principles of Asynchronous Circuit Design , 2001 .

[18]  Maciej Koutny,et al.  A Taxonomy of Persistent and Nonviolent Steps , 2013, Petri Nets.