Secondary Particulate Matter in the United States: Insights from the Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies

Abstract Secondary aerosols comprise a major fraction of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in all parts of the country, during all seasons, and times of day. The most abundant secondary species include sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). The relative abundance of each species varies in space and time as a function of meteorology, source emissions strength and type, thermodynamics, and atmospheric processing. Transport of secondary aerosols from upwind locations can contribute significantly at downwind receptor sites, especially regionally in the eastern United States, and across a given urbanized area, such as in Los Angeles. Processes governing the formation of the inorganic secondary species (sul-fate, nitrate, and ammonium) are fairly well understood, although the occurrence of nucleation bursts initiated with the formation of ultrafine sulfuric acid particles observed regionally on clean days in the eastern United States was unexpected. Because of the complex nature of organic material in air, much is still to be learned about the sources, formation, and even spatial and temporal distributions of SOAs. For example, a considerable fraction of ambient organic PM is oxidized organic species, many of which still need to be identified, quantified, and their sources and formation mechanisms determined. Furthermore, significant uncertainty (approaching 50% or more) is associated with estimating the SOA fraction of organic material in air with current methods. This review summarizes the findings of the Supersites Program and related studies addressing secondary particulate matter (PM), including spatial and temporal variations of secondary PM and its precursor species, data and methods for determining the primary and secondary fractions of PM mass, and findings on the anthropogenic and natural fractions of secondary PM.

[1]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  EPA Supersites Program-Related Emissions-Based Particulate Matter Modeling: Initial Applications and Advances , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  R. Glick.  Introduction to special issue , 2007, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[3]  Xiaoyan Xia,et al.  Seasonal variation of 2-methyltetrols in ambient air samples. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  P. Solomon,et al.  Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology for Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies , 2006 .

[5]  P. Solomon,et al.  Preface to special section on Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies , 2006 .

[6]  J. Chow,et al.  A Special Issue of the Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association on the Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies , 2006 .

[7]  C I Davidson,et al.  Semicontinuous measurements of organic carbon and acidity during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: implications for acid-catalyzed organic aerosol formation. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  P. Solomon,et al.  PrefaceSpecial issue of Atmospheric Environment for Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies , 2006 .

[9]  Christian Hogrefe,et al.  Assessing the Comparability of Ammonium, Nitrate and Sulfate Concentrations Measured by Three Air Quality Monitoring Networks , 2005 .

[10]  M. Claeys,et al.  Formation of 2-methyl tetrols and 2-methylglyceric acid in secondary organic aerosol from laboratory irradiated isoprene/NOX/SO2/air mixtures and their detection in ambient PM2.5 samples collected in the eastern United States , 2005 .

[11]  P. Solomon,et al.  Airborne Particulate Matter and Human Health: A Review , 2005 .

[12]  Annmarie G Carlton,et al.  Isoprene forms secondary organic aerosol through cloud processing: model simulations. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Daniel P. Connell,et al.  The Steubenville Comprehensive Air Monitoring Program (SCAMP): Analysis of Short-Term and Episodic Variations in PM2.5 Concentrations Using Hourly Air Monitoring Data , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  C. Sioutas,et al.  Seasonal and spatial variability of the size‐resolved chemical composition of particulate matter (PM10) in the Los Angeles Basin , 2005 .

[15]  J. Ondov,et al.  Highly time-resolved organic and elemental carbon measurements at the Baltimore Supersite in 2002 , 2005 .

[16]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Atmospheric volatile organic compound measurements during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Results, interpretation, and quantification of primary and secondary contributions , 2005 .

[17]  C. Stanier,et al.  Modeling of in situ ultrafine atmospheric particle formation in the eastern United States , 2005 .

[18]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Time- and size-resolved chemical composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes , 2005 .

[19]  J. Ondov,et al.  Seasonal and shorter-term variations in particulate atmospheric nitrate in Baltimore , 2005 .

[20]  Satya Sardar,et al.  Size-fractionated measurements of ambient ultrafine particle chemical composition in Los Angeles using the NanoMOUDI. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Weixiang Zhao,et al.  Source identification of fine particles in Washington, DC, by expanded factor analysis modeling. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  J. Arey,et al.  Atmospheric reactions influence seasonal PAH and nitro-PAH concentrations in the Los Angeles basin. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Kenneth L. Demerjian,et al.  Sources of fine particle composition in New York city , 2004 .

[24]  D. Allen,et al.  Estimates of Anthropogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation in Houston, Texas Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[25]  W. Parkhurst,et al.  Fossil Sources of Ambient Aerosol Carbon Based on 14C Measurements Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[26]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part I: Mass Concentrations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[27]  D. Allen,et al.  Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[28]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Advanced Factor Analysis on Pittsburgh Particle Size-Distribution Data Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[29]  Andrey Khlystov,et al.  Nucleation Events During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Description and Relation to Key Meteorological, Gas Phase, and Aerosol Parameters Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[30]  Kenneth L. Demerjian,et al.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part II: Chemically Speciated Mass Distributions Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[31]  A. Northcross,et al.  Atmospheric organic aerosol production by heterogeneous acid-catalyzed reactions. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[32]  Robert P Hodyss,et al.  Particle phase acidity and oligomer formation in secondary organic aerosol. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  J. Schauer,et al.  Trends in secondary organic aerosol at a remote site in Michigan's upper peninsula. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Charles W. Lewis,et al.  Radiocarbon measurement of the biogenic contribution to summertime PM-2.5 ambient aerosol in Nashville, TN , 2004 .

[35]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Low-Molecular-Weight and Oligomeric Components in Secondary Organic Aerosol from the Ozonolysis of Cycloalkenes and α-Pinene , 2004 .

[36]  S. Chu.  PM2.5 episodes as observed in the speciation trends network , 2004 .

[37]  Kazuhiko Ito,et al.  Spatial variation of PM2.5 chemical species and source-apportioned mass concentrations in New York City , 2004 .

[38]  P. Bhave,et al.  Primary and secondary organic aerosols over the United States: estimates on the basis of observed organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), and air quality modeled primary OC/EC ratios , 2004 .

[39]  F. Drewnick,et al.  Semicontinuous PM2.5 Sulfate and Nitrate Measurements at an Urban and a Rural Location in New York: PMTACS-NY Summer 2001 and 2002 Campaigns , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[40]  K. Demerjian,et al.  Aerosol chemical composition in New York state from integrated filter samples: Urban/rural and seasonal contrasts , 2004 .

[41]  P. Adams,et al.  A temporally and spatially resolved ammonia emission inventory for dairy cows in the United States , 2004 .

[42]  Philip K Hopke,et al.  Source Apportionment of Fine Particles in Washington, DC, Utilizing Temperature-Resolved Carbon Fractions , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[43]  J. Schauer,et al.  Hourly and Daily Patterns of Particle-Phase Organic and Elemental Carbon Concentrations in the Urban Atmosphere , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[44]  Jay R. Turner,et al.  A method for on‐line measurement of water‐soluble organic carbon in ambient aerosol particles: Results from an urban site , 2004 .

[45]  D. Allen,et al.  Seasonal and spatial trends in primary and secondary organic carbon concentrations in southeast Texas , 2004 .

[46]  K. Demerjian,et al.  Sources of fine particulate sulfate in New York , 2004 .

[47]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Improving source identification of Atlanta aerosol using temperature resolved carbon fractions in positive matrix factorization , 2004 .

[48]  M. Fraser,et al.  Polar organic compounds measured in fine particulate matter during TexAQS 2000 , 2004 .

[49]  PM data analysis: a comparison of two urban areas: Fresno and Atlanta , 2004 .

[50]  William K. Modey,et al.  Ambient fine particulate concentrations and chemical composition at two sampling sites in metropolitan Pittsburgh: a 2001 intensive summer study , 2004 .

[51]  A. Wexler,et al.  Ultrafine nitrate particle events in Baltimore observed by real-time single particle mass spectrometry , 2004 .

[52]  Cliff I. Davidson,et al.  Semi-continuous PM2.5 inorganic composition measurements during the Pittsburgh air quality study , 2004 .

[53]  J. C. Cabada,et al.  Mass size distributions and size resolved chemical composition of fine particulate matter at the Pittsburgh supersite , 2004 .

[54]  Andrey Khlystov,et al.  Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS) , 2004 .

[55]  D. Allen,et al.  Special issue of Atmospheric Environment on findings from EPA's Particulate Matter Supersites Program☆ , 2004 .

[56]  Cliff I. Davidson,et al.  Pittsburgh air quality study overview , 2004 .

[57]  D. Allen,et al.  Sesquiterpene Emissions and Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Potentials for Southeast Texas Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[58]  D. Allen,et al.  Size Distributions of Organic Functional Groups in Ambient Aerosol Collected in Houston, Texas Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[59]  Allen L. Robinson,et al.  Estimating the Secondary Organic Aerosol Contribution to PM2.5 Using the EC Tracer Method Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[60]  U. Baltensperger,et al.  Identification of Polymers as Major Components of Atmospheric Organic Aerosols , 2004, Science.

[61]  Hanna Vehkamäki,et al.  Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations , 2004 .

[62]  J. Schauer,et al.  Diurnal variations of individual organic compound constituents of ultrafine and accumulation mode particulate matter in the Los Angeles Basin. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[63]  Weixiang Zhao,et al.  Source identification of volatile organic compounds in Houston, Texas. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[64]  M. Andreae,et al.  Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosols Through Photooxidation of Isoprene , 2004, Science.

[65]  William C. Malm,et al.  Spatial and monthly trends in speciated fine particle concentration in the United States , 2004 .

[66]  F. J. Cox,et al.  Formation of oligomers in secondary organic aerosol. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  A. Robinson,et al.  Spatial Variations of PM2.5 During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study , 2004 .

[68]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Particulate matter science for policy makers : a NARSTO assessment , 2004 .

[69]  Richard M. Kamens,et al.  Effect of acidic seed on biogenic secondary organic aerosol growth , 2003 .

[70]  Edward O. Edney,et al.  Polar organic oxygenates in PM2.5 at a southeastern site in the United States , 2003 .

[71]  H. Puxbaum,et al.  Size distribution and seasonal variation of atmospheric cellulose , 2003 .

[72]  J. Arey,et al.  Methyl- and dimethyl-/ethyl-nitronaphthalenes measured in ambient air in Southern California , 2003 .

[73]  P. Hopke,et al.  Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[74]  Richard M. Kamens,et al.  Organic aerosol growth by acid-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions of octanal in a flow reactor , 2003 .

[75]  E. Cowling,et al.  Overview of the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project , 2003 .

[76]  A. Russell,et al.  Daily sampling of PM2.5 in Atlanta: Results of the first year of the Assessment of Spatial Aerosol Composition in Atlanta study , 2003 .

[77]  D. Murphy,et al.  Nitrate and oxidized organic ions in single particle mass spectra during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project , 2003 .

[78]  W. Chameides,et al.  Discrete measurements of reactive gases and fine particle mass and composition during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Experiment , 2003 .

[79]  S. Hering,et al.  Performance Evaluation and Use of a Continuous Monitor for Measuring Size-Fractionated PM 2.5 Nitrate , 2003 .

[80]  S. Slanina,et al.  Continuous wet denuder measurements of atmospheric nitric and nitrous acids during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite , 2003 .

[81]  R. Weber,et al.  Short-Term Temporal Variation in PM2.5 Mass and Chemical Composition during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment, 1999 , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[82]  A. Nel,et al.  Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[83]  D. Allen,et al.  Fine particulate matter source attribution for Southeast Texas using 14C/13C ratios , 2002 .

[84]  R. Kamens,et al.  Heterogeneous Atmospheric Aerosol Production by Acid-Catalyzed Particle-Phase Reactions , 2002, Science.

[85]  B. Turpin,et al.  Origins of primary and secondary organic aerosol in Atlanta: results of time-resolved measurements during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[86]  Donald Dabdub,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol 3. Urban/regional scale model of size- and composition-resolved aerosols , 2002 .

[87]  J. Schauer,et al.  Source reconciliation of atmospheric gas-phase and particle-phase pollutants during a severe photochemical smog episode. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[88]  C. Sioutas,et al.  A Methodology for Measuring Size-Dependent Chemical Composition of Ultrafine Particles , 2002 .

[89]  J. C. Cabada,et al.  Sources of Atmospheric Carbonaceous Particulate Matter in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[90]  J. Schauer,et al.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the Southeastern United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[91]  S. Solberg,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 2002 .

[92]  R. Kamens,et al.  Atmospheric secondary aerosol formation by heterogeneous reactions of aldehydes in the presence of a sulfuric acid aerosol catalyst. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[93]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Sources of fine particle composition in the northeastern US , 2001 .

[94]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass , 2001 .

[95]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements , 2001 .

[96]  J. Chow,et al.  Air Quality Measurements from the Fresno Supersite , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[97]  K. Prather,et al.  Variations in the Size and Chemical Composition of Nitrate-Containing Particles in Riverside, CA , 2000 .

[98]  A. Wexler,et al.  Size distributions of particulate sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium at a coastal site in Hong Kong , 1999 .

[99]  Matthew P. Fraser,et al.  Detection of Excess Ammonia Emissions from In-Use Vehicles and the Implications for Fine Particle Control , 1998 .

[100]  D. Klockow,et al.  Spectroscopic Characterization of Humic-Like Substances in Airborne Particulate Matter , 1998 .

[101]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Gas/Particle Partitioning and Secondary Organic Aerosol Yields , 1996 .

[102]  H. Puxbaum,et al.  Enzymatic determination of the cellulose content of atmospheric aerosols , 1996 .

[103]  U. Epa.  Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter , 1996 .

[104]  B. Turpin,et al.  Identification of secondary organic aerosol episodes and quantitation of primary and secondary organic aerosol concentrations during SCAQS , 1995 .

[105]  G. Cass,et al.  Los Angeles Summer Midday Particulate Carbon: Primary and Secondary Aerosol , 1991 .

[106]  W. Carter,et al.  Measurements of nitrous acid in an urban area , 1986 .

[107]  Grinding Facility,et al.  Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards , 1976 .