Evaluation of the Central Vein Sign as a Diagnostic Imaging Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis.

Importance The central vein sign has been proposed as a specific imaging biomarker for distinguishing between multiple sclerosis (MS) and not MS, mainly based on findings from ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. The diagnostic value of the central vein sign in a multicenter setting with a variety of clinical 3 tesla (T) MRI protocols, however, remains unknown. Objective To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various central vein sign lesion criteria for differentiating MS from non-MS conditions using 3T brain MRI with various commonly used pulse sequences. Design, Setting, and Participants This large multicenter, cross-sectional study enrolled participants (n = 648) of ongoing observational studies and patients included in neuroimaging research databases of 8 neuroimaging centers in Europe. Patient enrollment and MRI data collection were performed between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2016. Data analysis was conducted between January 1, 2016, and April 30, 2018. Investigators were blinded to participant diagnosis by a novel blinding procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures Occurrence of central vein sign was detected on 3T T2*-weighted or susceptibility-weighted imaging. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed for these MRI sequences and for different central vein sign lesion criteria, which were defined by the proportion of lesions with central vein sign or by absolute numbers of lesions with central vein sign. Results A total of 606 participants were included in the study after exclusion of 42 participants. Among the 606 participants, 413 (68.2%) were women. Patients with clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) included 235 women (66.6%) and had a median (range) age of 37 (14.7-61.4) years, a median (range) disease duration of 2 (0-33) years, and a median (range) Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 1.5 (0-6.5). Patients without MS included 178 women (70.4%) and had a median (range) age of 54 (18-83) years. A total of 4447 lesions were analyzed in a total of 487 patients: 690 lesions in 98 participants with clinically isolated syndrome, 2815 lesions in 225 participants with RRMS, 54 lesions in 13 participants with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, 54 lesions in 14 participants with systemic lupus erythematosus, 121 lesions in 29 participants with migraine or cluster headache, 240 lesions in 20 participants with diabetes, and 473 lesions in 88 participants with other types of small-vessel disease. The sensitivity was 68.1% and specificity was 82.9% for distinguishing MS from not MS using a 35% central vein sign proportion threshold. The 3 central vein sign lesion criteria had a sensitivity of 61.9% and specificity of 89.0%. Sensitivity was higher when an optimized T2*-weighted sequence was used. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, use of the central vein sign at 3T MRI yielded a high specificity and a moderate sensitivity in differentiating MS from not MS; international, multicenter studies may be needed to ascertain whether the central vein sign-based criteria can accurately detect MS.

[1]  A. Cross,et al.  Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2018, Neurology.

[2]  Pascal Sati,et al.  FLAIR*: a combined MR contrast technique for visualizing white matter lesions and parenchymal veins. , 2012, Radiology.

[3]  A. Traboulsee,et al.  International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders , 2015, Neurology.

[4]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  O. Ciccarelli,et al.  MRI CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: MAGNIMS CONSENSUS GUIDELINES , 2016, The Lancet Neurology.

[6]  D. Reich,et al.  “Central vessel sign” on 3T FLAIR* MRI for the differentiation of multiple sclerosis from migraine , 2015, Annals of clinical and translational neurology.

[7]  P. Trillenberg,et al.  Multicentre comparison of a diagnostic assay: aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica , 2016, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[8]  Suk-Won Ahn,et al.  Application of the 2017 McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis in Korean patients with clinically isolated syndrome , 2018, Multiple sclerosis.

[9]  V. Tomassini,et al.  Impact of the 2017 revisions to McDonald criteria on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2018, Multiple sclerosis.

[10]  F. Paul,et al.  Identical lesion morphology in primary progressive and relapsing–remitting MS –an ultrahigh field MRI study , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[11]  Massimo Filippi,et al.  Central vein sign differentiates Multiple Sclerosis from central nervous system inflammatory vasculopathies , 2018, Annals of neurology.

[12]  Su-Hyun Kim,et al.  The usefulness of brain MRI at onset in the differentiation of multiple sclerosis and seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[13]  M E Miquel,et al.  FLAIR* to visualize veins in white matter lesions: A new tool for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis? , 2017, European Radiology.

[14]  D. Reich,et al.  Clinical 3-tesla FLAIR* MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in multiple sclerosis , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[15]  M. Midiri,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: High prevalence of the ‘central vein’ sign in white matter lesions on susceptibility-weighted images , 2018, The neuroradiology journal.

[16]  D. Reich,et al.  Rapid, high-resolution, whole-brain, susceptibility-based MRI of multiple sclerosis , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[17]  C. Catsman-Berrevoets,et al.  Real-world validation of the 2017 McDonald criteria for pediatric MS , 2018, Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

[18]  S. Ourselin,et al.  Value of the central vein sign at 3T to differentiate MS from seropositive NMOSD , 2018, Neurology.

[19]  P. Morgan,et al.  Imaging central veins in brain lesions with 3-T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging differentiates multiple sclerosis from microangiopathic brain lesions , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[20]  J. Simon,et al.  Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients , 2013, Multiple sclerosis.

[21]  Nikos Evangelou,et al.  A Comparison of 3T and 7T in the Detection of Small Parenchymal Veins Within MS Lesions , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[22]  M. Schlamann,et al.  First Clinical Study on Ultra-High-Field MR Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of 1.5T and 7T , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[23]  K. Šurlan Popovič,et al.  Presence of central veins and susceptibility weighted imaging for evaluating lesions in multiple sclerosis and leukoaraiosis. , 2017, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[24]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Lesion morphology at 7 Tesla MRI differentiates Susac syndrome from multiple sclerosis , 2012, Multiple sclerosis.

[25]  M. Benedetti,et al.  2017 McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis: Earlier diagnosis with reduced specificity? , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[26]  Pascal Sati,et al.  Diagnostic performance of central vein sign for multiple sclerosis with a simplified three-lesion algorithm , 2018, Multiple sclerosis.

[27]  F. Barkhof,et al.  The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial , 2016, Neurology.

[28]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[29]  M. Habek,et al.  Establishing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in Croatian patients with clinically isolated syndrome: 2010 versus 2017 McDonald criteria. , 2018, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[30]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  The current role of MRI in differentiating multiple sclerosis from its imaging mimics , 2018, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[31]  C. Pfueller,et al.  Distinct lesion morphology at 7-T MRI differentiates neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis , 2012, Neurology.

[32]  Nikos Evangelou,et al.  The Central Vein Sign in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Is Present Irrespective of the T2* Sequence at 3 T , 2017, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[33]  P. Calabresi,et al.  2017 revisions of McDonald criteria shorten the time to diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in clinically isolated syndromes , 2018, Journal of Neurology.

[34]  R. Hintzen,et al.  Application of the 2017 Revised McDonald Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis to Patients With a Typical Clinically Isolated Syndrome , 2018, JAMA neurology.

[35]  Roland G. Henry,et al.  The central vein sign and its clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement from the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative , 2016, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[36]  W. Johnson,et al.  Limited utility of current MRI criteria for distinguishing multiple sclerosis from common mimickers: primary and secondary CNS vasculitis, lupus and Sjogren’s syndrome , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[37]  P S Morgan,et al.  Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions , 2011, Neurology.