Quantum gate synthesis by small perturbation of a free particle in a box with electric field

A quantum unitary gate is realized in this paper by perturbing a free charged particle in a one-dimensional box with a time- and position-varying electric field. The perturbed Hamiltonian is composed of a free particle Hamiltonian plus a perturbing electric potential such that the Schr$\ddot{o}$dinger evolution in time $T$, the unitary evolution operator of the unperturbed system after truncation to a finite number of energy levels, approximates a given unitary gate such as the quantum Fourier transform gate. The idea is to truncate the half-wave Fourier sine series to $M$ terms in the spatial variable $\mathbf x$ before extending the potential as a Dyson series in the interaction picture to compute the evolution operator matrix elements up to the linear and quadratic integral functionals of $ \mathbf V_n(t)'$s. As a result, we used the Dyson series with the Frobenius norm to reduce the difference between the derived gate energy and the given gate energy, and we determined the temporal performance criterion by plotting the noise-to-signal energy ratio (NSER). A mathematical explanation for a quantum gate's magnetic control has also been provided. In addition, we provide a mathematical explanation for a quantum gate that uses magnetic control.

[1]  Tarun Kumar Rawat,et al.  Realization of the three-qubit quantum controlled gate based on matching Hermitian generators , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[2]  Tarun Kumar Rawat,et al.  Realization of a quantum gate using gravitational search algorithm by perturbing three-dimensional harmonic oscillator with an electromagnetic field , 2016, Quantum Inf. Process..

[3]  Tarun Kumar Rawat,et al.  Realization of quantum gates based on three-dimensional harmonic oscillator in a time-varying electromagnetic field , 2015, Quantum Inf. Process..

[4]  Tarun Kumar Rawat,et al.  Realization of commonly used quantum gates using perturbed harmonic oscillator , 2015, Quantum Inf. Process..

[5]  V. Scarani,et al.  Oblivious transfer and quantum channels as communication resources , 2013, Natural Computing.

[6]  Arno R Bohm,et al.  A brief survey of the mathematics of quantum physics , 2009 .

[7]  E. Villaseñor,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM MECHANICS , 1981 .

[8]  Antti Kupiainen,et al.  Towards a Derivation of Fourier’s Law for Coupled Anharmonic Oscillators , 2007 .

[9]  D. Shepherd.  On the Role of Hadamard Gates in Quantum Circuits , 2005, Quantum Inf. Process..

[10]  L. Kauffman,et al.  Yang–Baxterizations, Universal Quantum Gates and Hamiltonians , 2005, Quantum Inf. Process..

[11]  R. Srikanth.  A Computational Model for Quantum Measurement , 2003, Quantum Inf. Process..

[12]  C. Altafini.  On the Generation of Sequential Unitary Gates from Continuous Time Schrödinger Equations Driven by External Fields , 2002, Quantum Inf. Process..

[13]  R. Cleve,et al.  Quantum algorithms revisited , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Anders Karlsson,et al.  Quantum correlations in dual quantum measurements , 1997 .

[15]  Lloyd,et al.  Almost any quantum logic gate is universal. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[16]  Barenco,et al.  Elementary gates for quantum computation. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[17]  DiVincenzo,et al.  Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[18]  R. Gilmore,et al.  Coherent states: Theory and some Applications , 1990 .

[19]  A. Perelomov.  Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications , 1986 .

[20]  R. Glauber.  Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field , 1963 .

[21]  Morad El Baz,et al.  C-NOT three-gates performance by coherent cavity field and its optimized quantum applications , 2015, Quantum Inf. Process..

[22]  Tosio Kato.  Perturbation theory for linear operators , 1966 .