CONTEXT
Informal (curbside) consultations are an integral part of medical culture and may be of great value to patients and primary care physicians. However, little is known about physicians' behavior or attitudes toward curbside consultation.
OBJECTIVE
To describe and compare curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists.
DESIGN
Survey mailed in June 1997.
PARTICIPANTS
Of 286 primary care physicians and 252 subspecialists practicing in Rhode Island, 213 primary care physicians and 200 subspecialists responded (response rate, 76.8%).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Self-reported practices of, reasons for, and attitudes about curbside consultation.
RESULTS
Of primary care physicians, 70.4% (150/213) and 87.5% (175/200) of subspecialists reported participating in at least 1 curbside consultation during the previous week. In the previous week, primary care physicians obtained 3.2 curbside consultations, whereas subspecialists received 3.6 requests for curbside consultations. Subspecialties most frequently involved in curbside consultations were cardiology, gastroenterology, and infectious diseases; subspecialties that were requested to provide curbside consultations more often than they were formally consulted were endocrinology, infectious diseases, and rheumatology. Curbside consultations were most often used to select appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment plans and to determine the need for formal consultation. Subspecialists perceived more often than primary care physicians that information communicated in curbside consultations was insufficient (80.2% vs 49.8%; P<.001) and that important clinical detail was not described (77.6% vs 43.5%; P<.001). More subspecialists than primary care physicians felt that curbside consultations were essential for maintaining good relationships with other physicians (77.2% vs 38.6%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Curbside consultation serves important functions in the practice of medicine. Despite the widespread use of curbside consultation, disagreement exists between primary care physicians and subspecialists as to the role of curbside consultation and the quality of the information exchanged.
[1]
A. D. Weinberg,et al.
Informal advice- and information-seeking between physicians.
,
1981,
Journal of medical education.
[2]
J. Myers.
Curbside consultation in infectious diseases: a prospective study.
,
1984,
The Journal of infectious diseases.
[3]
D. Covell,et al.
Information needs in office practice: are they being met?
,
1985,
Annals of internal medicine.
[4]
B. Yudkowsky,et al.
Barriers to pediatric referral in managed care systems.
,
1992,
Pediatrics.
[5]
J. Kassirer.
Access to specialty care.
,
1994,
The New England journal of medicine.
[6]
Curbside consultations: Manian FA, Janssen DA. JAMA 1996;275:145-7
,
1996
.
[7]
Curbside consultation in endocrine practice: A prospective observational study
,
1996
.
[8]
F A Manian,et al.
Curbside consultations. A closer look at a common practice.
,
1996,
JAMA.
[9]
D. McKinsey,et al.
A prospective study of 2,092 "curbside" questions asked of two infectious disease consultants in private practice in the midwest.
,
1996,
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
[10]
S. Pearson,et al.
Informal consultations provided to general internists by the gastroenterology department of an HMO
,
1998,
Journal of General Internal Medicine.