FolkTrails: Interpreting Navigation Behavior in a Social Tagging System

Social tagging systems have established themselves as a quick and easy way to organize information by annotating resources with tags. In recent work, user behavior in social tagging systems was studied, that is, how users assign tags, and consume content. However, it is still unclear how users make use of the navigation options they are given. Understanding their behavior and differences in behavior of different user groups is an important step towards assessing the effectiveness of a navigational concept and improving it to better suit the users' needs. In this work, we investigate navigation trails in the popular scholarly social tagging system BibSonomy from six years of log data. We discuss dynamic browsing behavior of the general user population and show that different navigational subgroups exhibit different navigational traits. Furthermore, we provide strong evidence that the semantic nature of the underlying folksonomy is an essential factor for explaining navigation.

[1]  Denis Helic,et al.  Detecting Memory and Structure in Human Navigation Patterns Using Markov Chain Models of Varying Order , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  A. Hotho,et al.  HypTrails: A Bayesian Approach for Comparing Hypotheses About Human Trails on the Web , 2014, WWW.

[3]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking , 2006, ESWC.

[4]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Human wayfinding in information networks , 2012, WWW.

[5]  Michael A. Rodriguez,et al.  Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  Dominik Benz,et al.  Stop thinking, start tagging: tag semantics emerge from collaborative verbosity , 2010, WWW '10.

[7]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Ranking web sites with real user traffic , 2008, WSDM '08.

[8]  David García,et al.  It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia , 2015, ICWSM.

[9]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  What Users Actually Do in a Social Tagging System , 2016, ACM Trans. Web.

[10]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Photowalking the City: Comparing Hypotheses About Urban Photo Trails on Flickr , 2015, SocInfo.

[11]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Dominik Benz,et al.  How Tagging Pragmatics Influence Tag Sense Discovery in Social Annotation Systems , 2013, ECIR.

[13]  D. Millen,et al.  Using Social Tagging to Improve Social Navigation , 2022 .

[14]  Dominik Benz,et al.  The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy , 2010, The VLDB Journal.

[15]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web , 2001, CHI.

[16]  Adam Mathes,et al.  Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata , 2004 .

[17]  Christian Wolff,et al.  Personal Information Management vs. Resource Sharing: Towards a Model of Information Behaviour in Social Tagging Systems , 2009, ICWSM 2009.

[18]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Semantic Grounding of Tag Relatedness in Social Bookmarking Systems , 2008, SEMWEB.

[19]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  MicroTrails: comparing hypotheses about task selection on a crowdsourcing platform , 2015, I-KNOW.