Statistical inference from multiple iTRAQ experiments without using common reference standards.

Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) is a prominent mass spectrometry technology for protein identification and quantification that is capable of analyzing multiple samples in a single experiment. Frequently, iTRAQ experiments are carried out using an aliquot from a pool of all samples, or "masterpool", in one of the channels as a reference sample standard to estimate protein relative abundances in the biological samples and to combine abundance estimates from multiple experiments. In this manuscript, we show that using a masterpool is counterproductive. We obtain more precise estimates of protein relative abundance by using the available biological data instead of the masterpool and do not need to occupy a channel that could otherwise be used for another biological sample. In addition, we introduce a simple statistical method to associate proteomic data from multiple iTRAQ experiments with a numeric response and show that this approach is more powerful than the conventionally employed masterpool-based approach. We illustrate our methods using data from four replicate iTRAQ experiments on aliquots of the same pool of plasma samples and from a 406-sample project designed to identify plasma proteins that covary with nutrient concentrations in chronically undernourished children from South Asia.

[1]  Terry M Therneau,et al.  Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  J. Yates,et al.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  Kelvin H. Lee,et al.  Quantitative analysis of protein expression using amine‐specific isobaric tags in Escherichia coli cells expressing rhsA elements , 2005, Proteomics.

[4]  Marco Grzegorczyk,et al.  Statistics for Proteomics: A Review of Tools for Analyzing Experimental Data , 2006, Proteomics.

[5]  I. Ruczinski,et al.  Some recommendations for the practitioner to improve the precision of experimentally determined protein folding rates and ϕ values , 2009, Proteins.

[6]  Olga Vitek,et al.  Getting Started in Computational Mass Spectrometry–Based Proteomics , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  T. Therneau,et al.  A statistical model for iTRAQ data analysis. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[8]  G. Churchill,et al.  Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. , 2001, Biostatistics.

[9]  Elizabeth G. Hill,et al.  iQuantitator: A tool for protein expression inference using iTRAQ , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  Olga Vitek,et al.  Computational Mass Spectrometry–Based Proteomics , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  L. Zieske A perspective on the use of iTRAQ reagent technology for protein complex and profiling studies. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  Jae K. Lee,et al.  Local-pooled-error test for identifying differentially expressed genes with a small number of replicated microarrays , 2003, Bioinform..

[13]  Neil Swainston,et al.  Capture and analysis of quantitative proteomic data , 2007, Proteomics.

[14]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[15]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[16]  A. Sommer,et al.  Effects of alternative maternal micronutrient supplements on low birth weight in rural Nepal: double blind randomised community trial , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Trong Khoa Pham,et al.  Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) reproducibility: Implication of multiple injections. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[19]  Trong Khoa Pham,et al.  Technical, experimental, and biological variations in isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[20]  Gilbert S Omenn,et al.  Differential protein expression profiling by iTRAQ-2DLC-MS/MS of lung cancer cells undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition reveals a migratory/invasive phenotype. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[21]  Crispin J. Miller,et al.  Eight-channel iTRAQ Enables Comparison of the Activity of Six Leukemogenic Tyrosine Kinases*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[22]  S. Khatry,et al.  Antenatal micronutrient supplementation reduces metabolic syndrome in 6- to 8-year-old children in rural Nepal. , 2009, The Journal of nutrition.

[23]  N. Karp,et al.  Addressing Accuracy and Precision Issues in iTRAQ Quantitation* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[25]  Kai A. Reidegeld,et al.  Protein labeling by iTRAQ: A new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research , 2007, Proteomics.

[26]  Benno Schwikowski,et al.  Assessing Bias in Experiment Design for Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Quantitative Proteomics*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.