Floating Ground Architecture: Overcoming the one-hop boundary of current mobile Internet

We propose the Floating Ground Architecture (FGA) for network mobility and ad hoc network convergence. Various factors, including excessive dependence on intelligence in the fixed network, result in the Internet having a de facto logical boundary one hop from the fixed network. To reduce these dependencies, FGA introduces a new logical layer, called Floating Ground, between the fixed network infrastructure and the mobile network, aiming to bridge these different types of network systems. Thanks to the effect of this buffer layer, the architecture: 1) optimizes routes in a deeply nested mobile router arrangement, 2) simplifies mobility event handling under frequent movement of the nodes, and 3) transparently introduces additional functionality with no additional intelligence on the infrastructure side. Through evaluation of our proposed architecture using an actual software implementation running via Direct Code Execution simulation, optimized routes are confirmed with three possible mobility scenarios, demonstrating the handoff duration is dramatically reduced in the short-distance movement scenario, which happens in 78.4%, at maximum, of the handoff events under actual taxi cabs movement in real world. Qualitative analysis of FGA shows it minimizes modification of the network components and existing standardized protocols, and is therefore more suitable for self-organized, distributed network extension than competitive approaches.

[1]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[2]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Internet-Based Mobile Ad Hoc Networking , 1999, IEEE Internet Comput..

[3]  Jun Murai,et al.  NAT-MANEMO: Route Optimization for Unlimited Network Extensibility in MANEMO , 2011, J. Inf. Process..

[4]  Israel Cidon,et al.  An Anchor Chain Scheme for IP Mobility Management , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[5]  Van Jacobson,et al.  Networking named content , 2009, CoNEXT '09.

[6]  Matthias Grossglauser,et al.  CRAWDAD dataset epfl/mobility (v.2009-02-24) , 2009 .

[7]  Christopher Edwards,et al.  Using NEMO to Support the Global Reachability of MANET Nodes , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[8]  M. Bagnulo,et al.  MIRON: MIPv6 route optimization for NEMO , 2004, 2004 4th Workshop on Applications and Services in Wireless Networks, 2004. ASWN 2004..

[9]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Vehicular Networks: Techniques, Standards, and Applications , 2009 .

[10]  Chris Edwards,et al.  Protocols to efficiently support nested NEMO (NEMO+) , 2008, MobiArch '08.

[11]  Emmanuel Baccelli,et al.  IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks , 2010, RFC.

[12]  Jun Murai,et al.  ORC: optimized route cache management protocol for network mobility , 2003, 10th International Conference on Telecommunications, 2003. ICT 2003..

[13]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  Route Optimization in Nested NEMO: Classification, Evaluation, and Analysis from NEMO Fringe Stub Perspective , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  Jun Murai,et al.  Migrating home agents towards internet-scale mobility deployments , 2006, CoNEXT '06.

[15]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Measuring ISP topologies with Rocketfuel , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[16]  References , 1971 .

[17]  Lixia Zhang,et al.  Ad hoc networking via named data , 2010, MobiArch '10.

[18]  Pyda Srisuresh,et al.  Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT) , 2001, RFC.

[19]  Zhuoqing Morley Mao,et al.  Wide-Area IP Network Mobility , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[20]  Djamal Zeghlache,et al.  Light-NEMO+: Route Optimzation for Light-NEMO Solution , 2006, 2006 14th IEEE International Conference on Networks.

[21]  Tony Larsson,et al.  MIPMANET: mobile IP for mobile ad hoc networks , 2000, MobiHoc.

[22]  Jun Murai,et al.  MANEMO Routing in Practice: Protocol Selection, Expected Performance, and Experimental Evaluation , 2010, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[23]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Ad Hoc Networking in the Internet: A Deeper Problem Than It Seems , 2008 .

[24]  P. Baran,et al.  On Distributed Communications Networks , 1964 .

[25]  David Thaler,et al.  Neighbor Discovery Proxies (ND Proxy) , 2006, RFC.

[26]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  HMIPv6: A hierarchical mobile IPv6 proposal , 2000, MOCO.

[27]  Ryuji Wakikawa,et al.  Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol , 2005, RFC.