Quantitative assessment of social losses based on physical damage and interaction with infrastructural systems

SUMMARY Metrics that describe direct social losses, such as number of casualties and fatalities, or the number of displaced people, which pose a demand for emergency shelter needs, or on the health-care system and other critical facilities, are key inputs for emergency response planning and preparedness. This paper presents a model to evaluate such performance indicators. The model integrates multiple infrastructural systems within a consistent computational framework where the consequences of their physical damage and interactions are used in the quantitative assessment of social losses. In particular, the interaction between the physical damage state of buildings and the combined residual service level in the utility networks is used to assess the habitability of buildings from which the number of displaced persons can be computed. The model is integrated within a larger analysis framework for the seismic vulnerability assessment of interconnected infrastructural systems, accounting for relevant uncertainties and interdependencies. A simple application illustrates the model capabilities. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The Influence of Geographical Resolution of Urban Exposure Data in an Earthquake Loss Model for Istanbul , 2010 .

[2]  J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East , 2010 .

[3]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Vector-valued Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2001 .

[4]  R. Spence,et al.  Earthquake Protection: Coburn/Earthquake Protection, Second Edition , 2006 .

[5]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Vector-valued Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (VPSHA) , 2002 .

[6]  Grady Booch,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications , 1990 .

[7]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  ON THE ROLE OF ROAD NETWORKS IN REDUCING HUMAN LOSSES AFTER EARTHQUAKES , 2006 .

[8]  J. Baker,et al.  Correlation model for spatially distributed ground‐motion intensities , 2009 .

[9]  I. Vanzi,et al.  Seismic reliability of electric power networks : methodology and application , 1996 .

[10]  Qiang Fu,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation of Water Supply Systems , 2010 .

[11]  Camillo Nuti,et al.  Assessment of post-earthquake availability of hospital system and upgrading strategies , 1998 .

[12]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[13]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Matrix-based system reliability method and applications to bridge networks , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Daniel Straub,et al.  A Bayesian Network Framework for Post-Earthquake Infrastructure System Performance Assessment , 2009 .

[15]  Erdem Karaca,et al.  Regional earthquake loss estimation : role of transportation network, sensitivity and uncertainty, and risk mitigation , 2005 .

[16]  C. Cornell,et al.  Correlation of Response Spectral Values for Multicomponent Ground Motions , 2006 .

[17]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient sampling and data reduction techniques for probabilistic seismic lifeline risk assessment , 2010 .