An Evaluation of the BEEHAVE Model Using Honey Bee Field Study Data: Insights and Recommendations

Abstract A lack of standard and internationally agreed procedures for higher‐tier risk assessment of plant protection products for bees makes coherent availability of data, their interpretation, and their use for risk assessment challenging. Focus has been given to the development of modeling approaches, which in the future could fill this gap. The BEEHAVE model, and its submodels, is the first model framework attempting to link 2 processes vital for the assessment of bee colonies: the within‐hive dynamics for honey bee colonies and bee foraging in heterogeneous and dynamic landscapes. We use empirical data from a honey bee field study to conduct a model evaluation using the control data set. Simultaneously, we are testing several model setups for the interlinkage between the within‐hive dynamics and the landscape foraging module. Overall, predictions of beehive dynamics fit observations made in the field. This result underpins the European Food Safety Authority's evaluation of the BEEHAVE model that the most important in‐hive dynamics are represented and correctly implemented. We show that starting conditions of a colony drive the simulated colony dynamics almost entirely within the first few weeks, whereas the impact is increasingly substituted by the impact of foraging activity. Common among field studies is that data availability for hive observations and landscape characterizations is focused on the proportionally short exposure phase (i.e., the phase where colony starting conditions drive the colony dynamics) in comparison to the postexposure phase that lasts several months. It is vital to redistribute experimental efforts toward more equal data aquisition throughout the experiment to assess the suitability of using BEEHAVE for the prediction of bee colony overwintering survival. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2535–2545. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC

[1]  F. Heimbach,et al.  Large-scale monitoring of effects of clothianidin dressed oilseed rape seeds on pollinating insects in Northern Germany: implementation of the monitoring project and its representativeness , 2016, Ecotoxicology.

[2]  J. Boesten,et al.  EFSA Guidance Document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees) , 2013 .

[3]  P. Thorbek,et al.  Colony impact of pesticide‐induced sublethal effects on honeybee workers: A simulation study using BEEHAVE , 2017, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[4]  P. Thorbek,et al.  Using BEEHAVE to explore pesticide protection goals for European honeybee (Apis melifera L.) worker losses at different forage qualities , 2017, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  T. Schmickl,et al.  HoPoMo : A model of honeybee intracolonial population dynamics and resource management , 2007 .

[6]  C. Topping,et al.  Statement on the suitability of the BEEHAVE model for its potential use in a regulatory context and for the risk assessment of multiple stressors in honeybees at the landscape level , 2015 .

[7]  Nigel D. Boatman,et al.  Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of Britain in bloom , 2015, Nature.

[8]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Food for Pollinators: Quantifying the Nectar and Pollen Resources of Urban Flower Meadows , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  P. J. Kennedy,et al.  BEEHAVE: a systems model of honeybee colony dynamics and foraging to explore multifactorial causes of colony failure , 2014, The Journal of applied ecology.

[10]  Zhenglei Gao,et al.  Large-scale monitoring of effects of clothianidin-dressed oilseed rape seeds on pollinating insects in Northern Germany: effects on honey bees (Apis mellifera) , 2016, Ecotoxicology.

[11]  M.A. Becher,et al.  BEESCOUT: A model of bee scouting behaviour and a software tool for characterizing nectar/pollen landscapes for BEEHAVE , 2016, Ecological modelling.

[12]  Silvia Hinarejos,et al.  Honey bee colony‐level exposure and effects in realistic landscapes: An application of BEEHAVE simulating clothianidin residues in corn pollen , 2019, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[13]  G. DeGrandi-Hoffman,et al.  Beepop: A Honeybee Population Dynamics Simulation Model , 1989 .

[14]  H. Li-Byarlay,et al.  Migratory management and environmental conditions affect lifespan and oxidative stress in honey bees , 2016, Scientific Reports.