Damage-free coring technique for rock mass under high in-situ stresses

Abstract Rock sampling with traditional coring method would cause initial damage to rock samples induced by in-situ stress relief during coring. To solve this problem, a damage-free coring method is proposed in this paper. The proposed coring scheme is numerically modeled first, and then it is verified by comparative laboratory tests using rock samples both obtained by conventional coring method and the proposed damage-free coring method. The result indicates that the in-situ stresses in sampling area could be reduced by 30%–50% through drilling a certain number of destressing holes around the whole sampling area. The spacing between adjacent destressing holes is about 10 cm. The average uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock samples obtained by the damage-free coring method in Jinping II hydropower station with overburden depth of 1 900 m is higher than that of samples obtained by the conventional coring method with the same depth by 5%–15% and an average of 8%. In addition, the effectiveness of damage-free coring method can also be verified by acoustic emission (AE) monitoring. The AE events monitored during uniaxial compression test of damage-free coring samples is fewer than that of conventional coring samples at the primarily loading phase.

[1]  N. Chandler,et al.  Excavation-induced damage studies at the Underground Research Laboratory , 2004 .

[2]  Rune M. Holt,et al.  Core quality: quantification of coring-induced rock alteration , 2000 .

[3]  Z. Shan,et al.  Behavior of Marble At Jinping II Project--Part 1: Intact Rock , 2010 .

[4]  Core Discing: Its Potential As an Indicator of Principal In Situ Stress Directions , 1989 .

[5]  G. Bäckblom,et al.  Recent experiments in hard rocks to study the excavation response: Implications for the performance of a nuclear waste geological repository , 1999 .

[6]  Rune M. Holt,et al.  CMS (constant mean stress) VS. UCS (unconfined strength) tests: A tool to reduce core damage effects , 1997 .

[7]  C. D. Martin,et al.  Estimating the potential for spalling around a deep nuclear waste repository in crystalline rock , 2009 .

[8]  F. G. Strickland,et al.  Use of Differential Strain Curve Analysis In Predicting In-situ Stress State For Deep Wells , 1980 .

[9]  Qian Qihu,et al.  TECTONIC,DEFORMATION AND FAILURE PROBLEMS OF DEEP ROCK MASS , 2006 .

[10]  R. Holt,et al.  7. Laboratory Simulation of the Influence of Earth Stress Changes on Wave Velocities , 1996 .

[11]  J. B. Martino,et al.  Observations of brittle failure around a circular test tunnel , 1997 .

[12]  R. S. Read,et al.  20 years of excavation response studies at AECL's Underground Research Laboratory , 2004 .

[13]  Z. Shan,et al.  Management of rock bursts during excavation of the deep tunnels in Jinping II Hydropower Station , 2010 .

[14]  Xie Heping,et al.  DEVELOPMENTS IN RESEARCHES ON MECHANICAL BEHAVIORS OF ROCKS UNDER THE CONDITION OF HIGH GROUND PRESSURE IN THE DEPTHS , 2005 .

[15]  H. Wang,et al.  Microcrack porosity and in situ stress in Illinois Borehole UPH 3 , 1986 .

[16]  Jia Yao-dong,et al.  STUDY ON ROCK MECHANICS IN DEEP MINING ENGINEERING , 2005 .