Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND The principal long-term complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been aseptic fixation failure. Many hip prostheses and operative techniques have been developed to improve outcomes, but few measures have been taken to cope with poor bone quality or hip structure. We assessed risk factors for aseptic fixation failure after THA. METHODS We assessed, by multivariate analysis, survival of 405 primary Charnley THAs to identify risk factors for aseptic fixation failures. We also investigated risk factors for development of rapid polyethylene wear (penetration depth of the femoral head into the socket polyethylene > or = 2 mm/year) FINDINGS In the entire series of 405 THAs, with use of radiographic fixation failure or revision for a loose socket as the endpoint, development of rapid polyethylene wear and the preoperative diagnosis of atrophic osteoarthrosis (defined by scarce osteophyte formation) were identified as risk factors for socket loosening (p < or = 0.02). A medullary canal with an unfavourable geometry (a stovepipe canal, Noble's canal-flare index < 3.0) was the only risk factor for femoral fixation failure (p < or = 6.7x10(3)). The only variable related to development of rapid polyethylene wear was the type of steel used in the femoral prosthesis--Ortron 90 prostheses significantly lowered the rate of development of rapid wear from 12.7% to 0.4%. In the 248 THAs in which these femoral prostheses were used, socket survival was affected only by the preoperative diagnosis of atrophic osteoarthrosis (for radiographic fixation failure and revision, p=4.0x10(-5) and p=0.042, respectively). INTERPRETATION In THA, the critical risk factors are poor bone quality, which manifests as atrophic osteoarthrosis, for socket survival and poor bone structure for femoral-prosthesis survival. To ensure longer durability of THAs, these factors should be assessed further and efforts, especially biological initiatives, should be made to resolve them.

[1]  R. Demarest,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty , 1993 .

[2]  John J. Callaghan,et al.  The Adult Hip , 1997 .

[3]  F. Dorey,et al.  Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement. , 1986, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  John J. Callaghan,et al.  Current Concepts Review - Wear in Total Hip and Knee Replacements* , 1999 .

[5]  C. Engh,et al.  Long-Term Results of Use of the Anatomic Medullary Locking Prosthesis in Total Hip Arthroplasty* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  K. Terayama,et al.  Factors influencing survivorship of the femoral component after primary low-friction hip arthroplasty. , 1992, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  R. Iorio,et al.  Risk factors affecting radiological failure of the socket in primary Charnley low friction arthroplasty. A 10- to 20-year followup study. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  K. Takaoka,et al.  Factors Affecting Aseptic Failure of Fixation after Primary Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty. Multivariate Survival Analysis* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  J. Charnley,et al.  Rate of wear in total hip replacement. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  B. Wroblewski,et al.  The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Gustilo Rb,et al.  Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty in young patients. , 1982 .

[12]  K. Terayama,et al.  Predisposing factors in fixation failure of femoral prostheses following primary Charnley low friction arthroplasty. A 10- to 20-year followup study. , 1994, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[13]  John Charnley,et al.  Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip: Theory and Practice , 1978 .

[14]  R C Johnston,et al.  The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  D. McMahon,et al.  Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty. A comparison of two matched paired groups. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  B. Wroblewski,et al.  Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip. 20-to-30 year results. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  H. Tullos,et al.  The anatomic basis of femoral component design. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  J. Ferguson.  The hip. Proceedings of the tenth open scientific meeting of the hip society , 1984 .

[19]  W. Harris,et al.  Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of Second-Generation Cementing Techniques. An Eighteen-Year-Average Follow-up Study* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  D. McMahon,et al.  Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty: A comparison of two matched paired groups , 1998 .

[21]  I. Sharp.  ACETABULAR DYSPLASIA: The Acetabular Angle , 1961 .

[22]  B E NORDIN,et al.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. , 1960, Clinical radiology.

[23]  K. Terayama,et al.  Radiology of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. A comparison of socket fixation techniques. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  M. Ritter,et al.  Radiological factors influencing femoral and acetabular failure in cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasties. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.