Electromechanical Response of Piezoelectric Honeycomb Foam Structures

A finite element model is developed to characterize the complete electromechanical properties of the most general form of elastically anisotropic and piezoelectrically active foams with honeycomb structures. Four classes of piezoelectric honeycomb structures are identified depending on the relative orientation of the poling direction with the porosity direction (longitudinal and transverse) and the geometry of the honeycombs (isotropic and anisotropic). It is observed that: (i) Most of the elastic, dielectric, and piezoelectric constants of the longitudinally porous honeycomb foams exhibit linear dependence on the volume fraction (or relative density) of the material; (ii) The electromechanical properties of transversely porous foam structures (with the exception of C22 and κ22) exhibit significant dependence on the shape of the porosity; (iii) The piezoelectric figures of merit of the longitudinally porous foams do not exhibit significant dependence on the shape of the porosity; (iv) The piezoelectric figures of merit of the transversely porous foams exhibit a strong dependence on the shape of the porosity with the hexagonal foams exhibiting enhanced hydrostatic strain coefficient and lower acoustic impedance while the square foams exhibiting enhanced piezoelectric coupling constant and hydrostatic figure of merit; (v) In transversely porous anisotropic honeycomb structures, the shear elastic constants such as C12 and C66 and some figures of merit are enhanced significantly when compared to their isotropic counterparts. For example, in the PZT–7A transversely porous anisotropic honeycomb structures with 10% relative density, the hydrostatic figure of merit is expected to be 2485% greater than that predicted for the transversely porous isotropic honeycomb structures.

[1]  L. E. Cross,et al.  Connectivity and piezoelectric-pyroelectric composites , 1978 .

[2]  R. Ting Piezoelectric properties of a porous PZT ceramic , 1985 .

[3]  Robert E. Newnham,et al.  An experimental and theoretical study of 1–3 AND 1-3-0 piezoelectric PZT-Polymer composites for hydrophone applications , 1986 .

[4]  H. Banno Effects of shape and volume fraction of closed pores on dielectric, elastic, and electromechanical properties of dielectric and piezoelectric ceramics: a theoretical approach , 1987 .

[5]  U. Bast,et al.  The influence of internal voids with 3–1 connectivity on the properties of piezoelectric ceramics prepared by a new planar process , 1989 .

[6]  Tetsuji Miyata,et al.  Properties of Hydrophone with Porous Piezoelectric Ceramics , 1991 .

[7]  M. Taya,et al.  Electromechanical Properties of Porous Piezoelectric Ceramics , 1993 .

[8]  K. Evans,et al.  Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs , 1996 .

[9]  F. M. Espinosa,et al.  Highly coupled dielectric behavior of porous ceramics embedding a polymer , 1996 .

[10]  Martin L. Dunn,et al.  Inclusions and inhomogeneities in transversely isotropic piezoelectric solids , 1997 .

[11]  Nicholas A. Dembsey,et al.  Fire characteristics of cored composite materials for marine use , 1998 .

[12]  Mark R. Kinkelaar,et al.  Vibrational Characterization of Various Polyurethane Foams Employed in Automotive Seating Applications , 1998 .

[13]  C. Galassi,et al.  Porous piezoelectric ceramic hydrophone , 1999 .

[14]  R. Broos,et al.  Endurance of Polyurethane Automotive Seating Foams under Varying Temperature and Humidity Conditions , 2000 .

[15]  A. Piancastelli,et al.  A microstructural study of porous piezoelectric ceramics obtained by different methods , 2001 .

[16]  Wei Pan,et al.  Fabrication and Evaluation of Porous Piezoelectric Ceramics and Porosity-Graded Piezoelectric Actuators , 2003 .

[17]  C. Bowen,et al.  Piezoelectric sensitivity of PbTiO3-based ceramic/polymer composites with 0–3 and 3–3 connectivity , 2003 .

[18]  L. Gibson Biomechanics of cellular solids. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  R. Kar-Gupta,et al.  Electromechanical response of 1-3 piezoelectric composites: Effect of poling characteristics , 2005 .

[20]  Hermann Seibert,et al.  Applications for PMI foams in aerospace sandwich structures , 2006 .

[21]  R. Kar-Gupta,et al.  Electromechanical response of porous piezoelectric materials , 2006 .

[22]  Werner Wirges,et al.  Optimized Preparation of Elastically Soft, Highly Piezoelectric, Cellular Ferroelectrets from Nonvoided Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Films , 2007 .

[23]  Hyoun‐Ee Kim,et al.  Fabrication of Porous PZT–PZN Piezoelectric Ceramics With High Hydrostatic Figure of Merits Using Camphene‐Based Freeze Casting , 2007 .

[24]  R. Kar-Gupta,et al.  Electromechanical response of porous piezoelectric materials: Effects of porosity distribution , 2007 .

[25]  A. Kalamkarov,et al.  Micromechanical analysis of effective piezoelastic properties of smart composite sandwich shells made of generally orthotropic materials , 2007 .

[26]  T. A. Venkatesh,et al.  Electromechanical response of 1-3 piezoelectric composites with hollow fibers , 2008 .

[27]  R. Kar-Gupta,et al.  Electromechanical response of 1–3 piezoelectric composites: Effect of fiber shape , 2008 .

[28]  Maen Alkhader,et al.  Mechanical response of cellular solids: Role of cellular topology and microstructural irregularity , 2008 .

[29]  R. Kar-Gupta,et al.  Electromechanical response of piezoelectric composites : Effects of geometric connectivity and grain size , 2008 .

[30]  M. Alkhader,et al.  The partition of elastic strain energy in solid foams and lattice structures , 2009 .

[31]  T. A. Venkatesh,et al.  Electromechanical response of porous piezoelectric materials: Effects of porosity connectivity , 2010 .

[32]  M. Ashby,et al.  Micro-architectured materials: past, present and future , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[33]  N. Fleck,et al.  Collapse mechanism maps for a hollow pyramidal lattice , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  H H Asada,et al.  Large Effective-Strain Piezoelectric Actuators Using Nested Cellular Architecture With Exponential Strain Amplification Mechanisms , 2010, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[35]  T. A. Venkatesh,et al.  Electromechanical response of (3-0) porous piezoelectric materials: Effects of porosity shape , 2011 .

[36]  T. A. Venkatesh,et al.  Effects of foam shape and porosity aspect ratio on the electromechanical properties of 3-3 piezoelectric foams , 2012 .

[37]  Scott I. Simon,et al.  Five Simple Rules to Avoid Plagiarism , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  J. Ortega,et al.  Virtual Treatment of Basilar Aneurysms Using Shape Memory Polymer Foam , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  John C Criscione,et al.  Estimation of aneurysm wall stresses created by treatment with a shape memory polymer foam device , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[40]  A. Shukla,et al.  Blast Performance of Marine Foam Core Sandwich Composites at Extreme Temperatures , 2012 .

[41]  T. A. Venkatesh,et al.  Electromechanical response of piezoelectric foams , 2012 .

[42]  T. A. Venkatesh,et al.  Computational Modeling of Piezoelectric Foams , 2013 .

[43]  D. Dunand,et al.  Texture and training of magnetic shape memory foam , 2013 .