Battery-electric transit bus developments and operations: A review

ABSTRACT In this article, we review the worldwide developments of battery-electric buses (a) from medium-sized vehicles (e.g., 6.7 m) to heavy-duty vehicles (e.g., 11 m), and (b) from the slow-charging mode (e.g., 6 hours) to the fast-charging mode (e.g., 10 minutes). We also review the worldwide operations of battery-electric buses (a) from 1907 in London, England, the early 1980s in Denver, Colorado, and the early 1990s in Santa Barbara, California, and Chattanooga, Tennessee, to various international cities now, and (b) from less than 20 vehicles in a transit agency to more than 1,000 vehicles. We summarize the experiences and lessons learned from real-world operations. We examine key technical specifications that are critical to the operations of electric bus systems, in particular the operational distance and charging time. Due to a limited operational range of battery-electric buses, three range remedy methods have been proposed: (a) regular (slow) battery charging with backup vehicles equipped with fully charged batteries; (2) battery swapping; and (3) fast opportunity charging during the layover period. We conduct a qualitative analysis on the strengths and weaknesses of each range remedy method. We also analyze the vehicle cost, energy cost, and emissions of transit buses powered by different sources, and examine potential impacts of fast-charging electric buses on the electric grid.

[1]  Lisa Callaghan,et al.  Analysis of Electric Drive Technologies for Transit Applications: Battery-Electric, Hybrid-Electric, and Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[2]  Ricardo Chicurel,et al.  Urban Electric Vehicle for Public Transportation , 1993 .

[3]  Uk-Don Choi,et al.  Commercial operation of ultra low floor electric bus for Seoul city route , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[4]  Feng Zhen,et al.  Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost and Year 2007 Emissions Estimation , 2007 .

[5]  Jon Wellinghoff,et al.  Plug-In Electric Vehicles: What Role for Washington? , 2009 .

[6]  Steven E. Shladover,et al.  PATH at 20—History and Major Milestones , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Xiaokun Cara Wang,et al.  Assessing Feasibility of Electric Buses in Small and Medium-Sized Communities , 2013 .

[8]  Graham Bell,et al.  Selecting Water Main Materials for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power , 2012 .

[9]  Yael Parag Plug‐In Electric Vehicles: What Role for Washington? , 2010 .

[10]  Joshua T Cohen,et al.  Fuels for urban transit buses: a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Cheng-Wei Lin,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation , 2005 .

[12]  Leslie Eudy,et al.  Challenges and Experiences with Electric Propulsion Transit Buses in the United States , 2003 .

[13]  D. Manager,et al.  Electric Vehicles , 1926, Nature.

[14]  Mark A Euritt,et al.  FEASIBILITY OF ELECTRIC BUS OPERATIONS FOR AUSTIN CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY , 1995 .

[15]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Issues and Uncertainties in Estimating the Health Benefits of Air Pollution Control , 2003, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[16]  C. Gellings Electric power research institute. , 1983, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Thomas W Dugan Electric buses in operation: The Chattanooga experience , 1994 .

[18]  R. Chicurel,et al.  Study for the Implementation Of an Electric Bus Route For Mexico City , 2000 .

[19]  Jing-Quan Li,et al.  Transit Bus Scheduling with Limited Energy , 2014, Transp. Sci..

[20]  P. Stolpman,et al.  Environmental Protection Agency , 2020, The Grants Register 2022.