Perspectives on interaction with dead users' profiles on Facebook

With the Covid-19 pandemic, death has become an increasingly present and visible phenomenon on social networks. On Facebook, there is not a homogeneous treatment of death among deceased users' profiles: some remain active, whereas others are turned into memorials, but the criteria for this transformation are not clear. In both cases, privacy settings limit the interaction. These different possibilities give rise to different interactions and reactions among users. This paper addresses how dead users' profiles, multiplied due to the current pandemic, have been treated by Facebook's social-technical system, in comparison to possible posthumous interactions in the physical world. Our main objective is to understand to what extent Facebook's technical system supports or restricts social interactions concerning users' deaths. We carried out a qualitative exploratory analysis of data from 54 Facebook profiles belonging to people who passed away between June 2020 and March 2021. Among other results, we noticed: that Facebook fails to publicize the criteria for transforming active profiles into memorials and who are their heir contacts; that there is a difference in the amount and frequency of interactions between profiles transformed into memorials and those that remain active; and that profiles' privacy settings interfere with social interaction. This situation directly influences the ways other users relate or not with such profiles, which is an object of paramount importance in Human-Computer Interaction studies, especially when considering interaction as existence.

[1]  P. C. Malshe What is this interaction? , 1994, The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India.

[2]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  The Political Economy of Death in the Age of Information: A Critical Approach to the Digital Afterlife Industry , 2017, Minds and Machines.

[3]  Vinícius Carvalho Pereira,et al.  Identity and volition in Facebook digital memorials and the challenges of anticipating interaction , 2019, IHC.

[4]  Jan David Smeddinck,et al.  From Personal Data to Digital Legacy: Exploring Conflicts in the Sharing, Security and Privacy of Post-mortem Data , 2021, WWW.

[5]  Katie Z. Gach,et al.  Getting Your Facebook Affairs in Order , 2021, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Technology and the Givens of Existence: Toward an Existential Inquiry Framework in HCI Research , 2018, CHI.

[7]  Amanda Lagerkvist,et al.  Existential media: Toward a theorization of digital thrownness , 2017, New Media Soc..

[8]  Bruno José Barcellos Fontanella,et al.  Amostragem em pesquisas qualitativas: proposta de procedimentos para constatar saturação teórica , 2011 .

[9]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Analysis of Configuration Decision Space Over Time: The Google Inactive Manager Account Case , 2016, IHC.

[10]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Exploring the Communication of Cultural Perspectives in Death-Related Interactive Systems , 2017, IHC.

[11]  Luis Amaral,et al.  A study on the need of digital heritage management plataforms , 2016, 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).

[12]  Andrea Bezerra Rodrigues,et al.  Percepção dos profissionais que atuam numa instituição de longa permanência para idosos sobre a morte e o morrer , 2013 .

[13]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Making the Case for an Existential Perspective in HCI Research on Mortality and Death , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Maria Amália Andery,et al.  Comportamento social, produção agregada e prática cultural: uma Análise Comportamental de fenômenos sociais , 2010 .

[15]  Mayra Delalibera,et al.  Adaptação e validação brasileira do instrumento de avaliação do luto prolongado – PG-13 , 2017 .

[16]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Perspectivas Normativas para o Legado Digital Pós-Morte Face à Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais , 2020 .

[17]  Gustavo S. Ueda,et al.  Um Negócio de Dois Mundos: Aspectos da Morte no Mundo Físico Transpostos para Memoriais Digitais , 2019, Anais do X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador na Web Social.

[18]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Recommendations for the Design of Digital Memorials in Social Web , 2019, HCI.

[19]  José Alvaro Marques Marcolino Luto: estudos sobre a perda na vida adulta , 1999 .

[20]  David Watson,et al.  Are the dead taking over Facebook? A Big Data approach to the future of death online , 2018, Big Data Soc..

[21]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Digital Legacy and Interaction , 2013, Human–Computer Interaction Series.

[22]  Nelson Jesus Teixeira Junior,et al.  A cultura digital , 2013 .

[23]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Digital Legacy Management Systems: Theoretical, Systemic and User's Perspective , 2021, ICEIS.

[24]  Katie Z. Gach,et al.  Experiences of Trust in Postmortem Profile Management , 2020, ACM Trans. Soc. Comput..

[25]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Digital Memorials: A proposal for data management beyond life , 2017, IHC.

[26]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Digital Generation and Posthumous Interaction: A Descriptive Analysis in Social Networks , 2021, ICEIS.

[27]  D. Machado Lei Geral De Proteção De Dados Pessoais - LGPD , 2021, Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento.

[28]  Roberto Pereira,et al.  A Discussion on Social Software: Concept, Building Blocks and Challenges , 2010 .

[29]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Internet Users' Legal and Technical Perspectives on Digital Legacy Management for Post-mortem Interaction , 2015, HCI.

[30]  Marcos O. Prates,et al.  An Exploratory Qualitative Study on People’s Attitudes towards Offline and Online Social Networks: A Case Study at a Brazilian University , 2015 .

[31]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  The internet generation and its representations of death: considerations for posthumous interaction projects , 2012, IHC.