Tailored Interfaces in Fiber-Reinforced Elastomers: A Surface Treatment Study on Optimized Load Coupling via the Modified Fiber Bundle Debond Technique

The interface between the reinforcement and surrounding matrix in a fibrous composite is decisive and critical for maintaining component performance, durability, and mechanical structure properties for load coupling assessment, especially for highly flexible composite materials. The clear trend towards tailored solutions reveals that an in-depth knowledge on surface treating methods to enhance the fiber–matrix interfacial interaction and adhesion properties for an optimized load transfer needs to be ensured. This research aims to quantify the effect of several surface treatments for glass fibers applied in endless fiber-reinforced elastomers with pronounced high deformations. Due to this, the glass fiber surface is directly modified with selected sizings, using a wet chemical treatment, and characterized according to chemical and mechanical aspects. For this purpose, the interfacial adhesion performance between fibers and the surrounding matrix material is investigated by a modified fiber pull-out device. The results clearly show that an optimized surface treatment improves the interface strength and chemical bonding significantly. The fiber pull-out test confirms that an optimized fiber–matrix interface can be enhanced up to 85% compared to standard surface modifications, which distinctly provides the basis of enhanced performances on the component level. These findings were validated by chemical analysis methods and corresponding optical damage analysis.

[1]  M Martignoni,et al.  [Silane coupling agents]. , 1990, Attualita dentale.

[2]  G. Désarmot,et al.  Advances in pull-out testing and data analysis , 1991 .

[3]  Triplicane A. Parthasarathy,et al.  THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FIBER PULLOUT AND PUSHOUT TESTS , 1991 .

[4]  H. Jacobasch Surface phenomena at polymers , 1993 .

[5]  G. Kalinka,et al.  An advanced equipment for single-fibre pull-out test designed to monitor the fracture process , 1995 .

[6]  H. Peterlik,et al.  Determination of interface parameters for carbon/carbon composites by the fibre-bundle pull-out test , 1996 .

[7]  G. Kalinka,et al.  Effect of transcrystallization in carbon fiber reinforced poly(p-phenylene sulfide) composites on the interfacial shear strength investigated with the single fiber pull-out test , 1996 .

[8]  R. Claus,et al.  The single-fibre pull-out test. 1: Review and interpretation , 1996 .

[9]  M. Piggott Why interface testing by single-fibre methods can be misleading , 1997 .

[10]  G. Kalinka,et al.  Characterisation of the fibre/matrix interface in reinforced polymers by the push-in technique , 1997 .

[11]  Frances S. Ligler,et al.  Comparison of chemical cleaning methods of glass in preparation for silanization , 1999 .

[12]  Ajit K. Roy,et al.  Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced composites , 1999 .

[13]  W. Michaeli,et al.  Verarbeitung und Eigenschaften von Faserverbundkunststoffen mit Elastomermatrix , 2000 .

[14]  D. Reinhoudt,et al.  Functionalization of self‐assembled monolayers on glass and oxidized silicon wafers by surface reactions , 2001 .

[15]  J. Nairn,et al.  Observations of Fiber Fracture and Interfacial Debonding Phenomena Using the Fragmentation Test in Single Fiber Composites , 2002 .

[16]  R. Weiss,et al.  A new fibre-bundle pull-out test to determine interface properties of a 2D-woven carbon/carbon composite , 2003 .

[17]  M. Villar,et al.  Bulk hydrosilylation reaction of poly(dimethylsiloxane) chains catalyzed by a platinum salt: Effect of the initial concentration of reactive groups on the final extent of reaction , 2003 .

[18]  K. Lim,et al.  Surface modification of glass and glass fibres by plasma surface treatment , 2004 .

[19]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Surface characterization of glass fibers made from silicate waste: Zeta-potential and contact angle measurements , 2004 .

[20]  Edith Mäder,et al.  Characterization of fiber/matrix interface strength: applicability of different tests, approaches and parameters , 2005 .

[21]  J. Antonucci,et al.  Interphase structure-property relationships in thermoset dimethacrylate nanocomposites. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  W. Zhong,et al.  Experimental study on adhesion property of UHMWPE fiber/nano-epoxy by fiber bundle pull-out tests , 2006 .

[23]  N. Washburn,et al.  Interphase effects in dental nanocomposites investigated by small-angle neutron scattering. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[24]  R. Oleschuk,et al.  Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) with a perfluorinated alkoxysilane for selectivity toward fluorous tagged peptides. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[25]  M. Stamm Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces , 2008 .

[26]  I. Sideridou,et al.  Effect of the Structure of Silane-Coupling Agent on Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Dental Resin-Nanocomposites , 2008 .

[27]  Larry D. Peel,et al.  Development of a Simple Morphing Wing Using Elastomeric Composites as Skins and Actuators , 2009 .

[28]  C. Cherif,et al.  Textile Werkstoffe für den Leichtbau , 2011 .

[29]  Liping Yu,et al.  Interfacial microstructure and properties of carbon fiber composites modified with graphene oxide. , 2012, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[30]  S. Farrokhpay,et al.  Fluoroalkylsilane treatment of TiO2 nanoparticles in difference pH values: Characterization and mechanism , 2012 .

[31]  J. Matinlinna,et al.  Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[32]  Shaopeng Wu,et al.  Surface modification of silica and its compounding with polydimethylsiloxane matrix: interaction of modified silica filler with PDMS , 2012, Iranian Polymer Journal.

[33]  E. Mäder,et al.  Analysis of a pull-out test with real specimen geometry. Part I: matrix droplet in the shape of a spherical segment , 2013 .

[34]  J. Kováč,et al.  XPS and AFM characterization of aminosilanes with different numbers of bonding sites on a silicon wafer , 2013 .

[35]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[36]  R. Calabrò Mechanical characterization of elastomers under quasi-static and dynamic biaxial loading conditions , 2013 .

[37]  M. Neitzel,et al.  Handbuch Verbundwerkstoffe: Werkstoffe, Verarbeitung, Anwendung , 2014 .

[38]  Letao Zhang,et al.  Modification of Glass Fiber Surface and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites Challenges and Opportunities: From Organic Chemistry Perspective , 2015 .

[39]  Yuqiu Yang,et al.  Mechanical performance of glass woven fabric composite: Effect of different surface treatment agents , 2016 .

[40]  Yingguang Li,et al.  Interfacial shear strength of microwave processed carbon fiber/epoxy composites characterized by an improved fiber-bundle pull-out test , 2016 .

[41]  Marco Debiasi,et al.  Measurements of a Symmetric Wing Morphed by Macro Fiber Composite Actuators , 2016 .

[42]  F. Blum,et al.  Development of superhydrophobicity in fluorosilane-treated diatomaceous earth polymer coatings , 2016 .

[43]  Tongqing Lu,et al.  Bioinspired bicipital muscle with fiber-constrained dielectric elastomer actuator , 2016 .

[44]  B. F. Sørensen,et al.  Fiber pull-out test and single fiber fragmentation test - analysis and modelling , 2016 .

[45]  Rui Li,et al.  Morphology and dynamic mechanical properties of long glass fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 composites , 2016, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[46]  Fionnuala Connolly,et al.  Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  K. Rajagopal,et al.  DETERMINING MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL RUBBER USING FEWER MATERIAL MODULI IN VIRTUE OF A NOVEL CONSTITUTIVE APPROACH FOR ELASTIC BODIES , 2017 .

[48]  Daohai Zhang,et al.  Effect of fiber length and dispersion on properties of long glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites based on poly(butylene terephthalate) , 2017 .

[49]  M. Lipke,et al.  Elektrophile Aktivierung von Silicium‐Wasserstoff‐ Bindungen in katalytischen Hydrosilierungen , 2017 .

[50]  J. Vuorinen,et al.  Microwave induced hierarchical nanostructures on aramid fibers and their influence on adhesion properties in a rubber matrix , 2017 .

[51]  N. Vleugels Short fibre-reinforced elastomeric composites, fundamental routes towards improvement of the interfacial interaction of short-cut aramid fibres in a SBR compound, to improve friction and wear properties , 2017 .

[52]  C. Teichert,et al.  Anti-adhesive layers on stainless steel using thermally stable dipodal perfluoroalkyl silanes , 2017 .

[53]  A. Olejnik,et al.  APTES-functionalized mesoporous silica as a vehicle for antipyrine – adsorption and release studies , 2017 .

[54]  C. Santulli,et al.  Interfacial Characterization by Pull-Out Test of Bamboo Fibers Embedded in Poly(Lactic Acid) , 2018 .

[55]  W. Kern,et al.  Tailoring the interfaces in glass fiber-reinforced photopolymer composites , 2018 .

[56]  T. Bechtold,et al.  Effect of fibre orientation on the mechanical properties of polypropylene–lyocell composites , 2018, Cellulose.

[57]  H. Heim,et al.  Single fiber pull-out test of regenerated cellulose fibers in polypropylene: An energetic evaluation , 2018 .

[58]  U. Gohs,et al.  Enhanced Interfacial Shear Strength and Critical Energy Release Rate in Single Glass Fiber-Crosslinked Polypropylene Model Microcomposites , 2018, Materials.

[59]  A. Shakun,et al.  Material‐related losses of natural rubber composites with surface‐modified nanodiamonds , 2020, Journal of Applied Polymer Science.

[60]  P. Laurikainen,et al.  DLC-treated aramid-fibre composites: Tailoring nanoscale-coating for macroscale performance , 2019, Composites Science and Technology.

[61]  E. Sarlin,et al.  Comparison and Impact of Different Fiber Debond Techniques on Fiber Reinforced Flexible Composites , 2020, Polymers.

[62]  J. Beter,et al.  Influence of Fiber Orientation and Adhesion Properties On Tailored Fiber-reinforced Elastomers , 2020, Applied Composite Materials.

[63]  J. Beter,et al.  The Tension-Twist Coupling Mechanism in Flexible Composites: A Systematic Study Based on Tailored Laminate Structures Using a Novel Test Device , 2020, Polymers.

[64]  K. Mittal Silanes and Other Coupling Agents , 2020 .

[65]  J. Beter,et al.  Investigation of adhesion properties in load coupling applications for flexible composites , 2020 .

[66]  J. Beter,et al.  The contribution of mechanical interactions to the constitutive modeling of fiber-reinforced elastomers , 2021 .