Toward hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery

Purpose of reviewTo summarize the recent medical literature related to the feasibility of hearing preservation after cochlear implantation and to identify variables that may influence hearing preservation in the implanted ear as well as the hearing perception outcomes. Recent findingsThe published data provide evidence that hearing preservation in the implanted ear yields significantly higher levels of speech recognition in complex listening environments than having just monaural acoustic hearing. There is ample evidence that hearing preservation is feasible and the reported rate is 50–89% in the low frequencies. This rate tends to be stable over time, except for a small percentage that diminishes around 3 months of follow-up. However, factors or variables which influence hearing preservation are yet unknown. Variables such as patient age, degree of residual hearing, insertion depth, insertion speed, duration of profound high frequency deafness and electrode design have been proposed. SummaryMuch attention has been focused on hearing preservation in the implanted ear. Thus, investigations into electrode array design, surgical technique and pharmacological management have been undertaken. Minimizing damage in the inner ear not only enhances the possibility for hearing preservation and better performance in complex listening scenarios but also conserves inner ear structures for future treatments.

[1]  A. Hudspeth The ionic channels of a vertebrate hair cell , 1986, Hearing Research.

[2]  C von Ilberg,et al.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. , 1999, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[3]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Cochlear Implantation With Hearing Preservation Yields Significant Benefit for Speech Recognition in Complex Listening Environments , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[4]  J. Siepmann,et al.  Dexamethasone eluting electrodes for cochlear implantation: Effect on residual hearing , 2015, Cochlear implants international.

[5]  Gunesh P. Rajan,et al.  The Effects of Insertion Speed on Inner Ear Function during Cochlear Implantation: A Comparison Study , 2012, Audiology and Neurotology.

[6]  English R. King,et al.  Cochleostomy Versus Round Window Insertions: Influence on Functional Outcomes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  A. Ryan,et al.  Systemic Immunity Influences Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation , 2012, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  T. Lenarz,et al.  European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[10]  M. Svirsky,et al.  Reimplantation of Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users With a Full-Length Electrode After Loss of Residual Hearing , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  S. Waltzman,et al.  The Effects of Residual Hearing in Traditional Cochlear Implant Candidates After Implantation With a Conventional Electrode , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  M. Manrique,et al.  Promontorial cochleostomy in nonhuman primates. Is it atraumatic? , 2011, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[13]  Marco Mandalà,et al.  Electrocochleography during Cochlear Implantation for Hearing Preservation , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  M. Manrique,et al.  Atraumaticity Study of 2 Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[15]  D. Hartley,et al.  Combined electro‐acoustic stimulation: a beneficial union? , 2008, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[16]  G. Rajan,et al.  The role of preoperative, intratympanic glucocorticoids for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: A prospective clinical study , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  B. Gantz,et al.  New frontiers in cochlear implantation: acoustic plus electric hearing, hearing preservation, and more. , 2012, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[18]  English R. King,et al.  Hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes with electric‐acoustic stimulation after 12 months of listening experience , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[19]  E. Ferrary,et al.  Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation , 2013, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[20]  A. Kral,et al.  Insertion site and sealing technique affect residual hearing and tissue formation after cochlear implantation , 2014, Hearing Research.