Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s

GIS eased into geography without much discord until the 1990s, when a flurry of commentaries about the relative merits of GIS made their way into a number of geographic journals. The ensuing decade was marked by varying degrees of friction between GIS practitioners and their critics in human geography. Despite the methodological chasm between the two groups, little discussion of the implications of these differences has ensued. This article fills that gap with a historiographic examination of critiques of GIS. Critiques of GIS are organized into three waves or periods, each characterized by distinct arguments. The first wave, from 1990 to 1994, was marked by the intensity of debate as well as an emphasis on positivism. By 1995, the conversation waned as the number of critics grew, while GIS practitioners increasingly declined comment. This second wave marked the initiation of a greater degree of co-operation between GIS scholars and their critics, however. With the inception of the National Center for Geographic Information Analysis (NCGIA) Initiative 19, intended to study the social effects of GIS, many critics began to work closely with their peers in GIS. In the third wave, critiques of GIS expressed a greater commitment to the technology. Throughout the decade, debates about the technology shifted from simple attacks on positivism to incorporating more subtle analyses of the effects of the technology. These critiques have had considerable effect on the academic GIS community but are presently constrained by limited communication with GIS practitioners because of the absence of a common vocabulary. I argue that, if critiques of GIS are to be effective, they must find a way to address GIS researchers, using the language and conceptual framework of the discipline.

[1]  A. Sokal,et al.  Revelation: A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies , 2000 .

[2]  W F Cunningham,et al.  The Emperor’s New Clothes , 2000, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[3]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  SPECIFICATIONS FOR INTEROPERABILITY: FORMALIZING IMAGE SCHEMATA FOR GEOGRAPHIC SPACE , 1999 .

[4]  Philip Kitcher A Plea for Science Studies Philip Kitcher , 1998 .

[5]  Noretta Koertge,et al.  A House Built on Sand , 1998 .

[6]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[7]  Nancy J. Obermeyer,et al.  The Evolution of Public Participation GIS , 1998 .

[8]  S. Elwood,et al.  How and Why Community Groups Use Maps and Geographic Information , 1998 .

[9]  Michael Barndt,et al.  Public Participation GIS—Barriers to Implementation , 1998 .

[10]  Noretta Koertge,et al.  A house built on sand : exposing postmodernist myths about science , 1998 .

[11]  Barry Smith,et al.  Ontology and Geographic Kinds , 1998 .

[12]  M. Curry The Digital Individual and the Private Realm , 1997 .

[13]  M. Violet Gray,et al.  Classification as an Impediment to Reliable and Valid Use of Spatial Information: A Disaggregate Approach , 1997, COSIT.

[14]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  The truth about Ground Truth , 1997, Trans. GIS.

[15]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Demystifying the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS as ‘Tool’ versus ‘Science’ , 1997 .

[16]  J. Pickles Tool or Science? GIS, Technoscience, and the Theoretical Turn , 1997 .

[17]  Francis Harvey,et al.  From Geographic Holism to Geographic Information System , 1997 .

[18]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS , 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[19]  Joseph T Rouse,et al.  Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically , 1996 .

[20]  Alan D. Sokal,et al.  Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity , 1996 .

[21]  David Demeritt,et al.  Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography , 1996 .

[22]  Norman Levitt,et al.  The flight from science and reason , 1996 .

[23]  Trevor M. Harris,et al.  GIS and Society: The Social Implications of How People, Space, and Environment Are Represented in GIS- Scientific Report for the Initiative 19 Specialist Meeting (96-7) , 1996 .

[24]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[25]  Judy R. Walton,et al.  How Real(ist) Can You Get?* , 1995, The Professional Geographer.

[26]  Howard Veregin,et al.  COMPUTER INNOVATION AND ADOPTION IN GEOGRAPHY: A CRITIQUE OF CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGICAL MODELS.. , 1995 .

[27]  Jon Goss,et al.  MARKETING THE NEW MARKETING: THE STRATEGIC DISCOURSE OF GEODEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS. , 1995 .

[28]  M. Curry Rethinking Rights and Responsibilities in Geographic Information Systems: Beyond the Power of the Image , 1995 .

[29]  Ron Johnston,et al.  GIS and Geography , 1995 .

[30]  John Pickles TOWARDS AN ECONOMY OF ELECTRONIC REPRESENTATION AND THE VIRTUAL SIGN. , 1995 .

[31]  Roger P. Miller Beyond Method, Beyond Ethics: Integrating Social Theory into GIS and GIS into Social Theory , 1995 .

[32]  Robert A. Rundstrom GIS, Indigenous Peoples, and Epistemological Diversity , 1995 .

[33]  Susan M. Roberts,et al.  EARTH SHATTERING: GLOBAL IMAGERY AND GIS. , 1995 .

[34]  J. Pickles Representations in an Electronic Age: Geography, GIS, and Democracy , 1995 .

[35]  Jeremy W. Crampton,et al.  The Ethics of GIS , 1995 .

[36]  P. Gross,et al.  Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science , 1994 .

[37]  D. Sui GIS AND URBAN STUDIES: POSITIVISM, POST-POSITIVISM, AND BEYOND , 1994 .

[38]  Thomas C. Waugh,et al.  Advances in GIS research : proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling , 1994 .

[39]  Eric Sheppard,et al.  Automated Geography: What Kind of Geography for What Kind of Society? , 1993 .

[40]  John Pickles,et al.  Discourse on Method and the History of Discipline: Reflections on Dobson's 1983 Automated Geography∗ , 1993 .

[41]  M. Armstrong On Automated Geography , 1993 .

[42]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[43]  R. Lake Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems , 1993 .

[44]  David M. Mark,et al.  GIS, Geography, and NCGIA: Response to Jerome Dobson* , 1993 .

[45]  T. Barnes Whatever Happened to the Philosophy of Science? , 1993 .

[46]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[47]  M. Mcneil Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1992 .

[48]  N. Smith History and philosophy of geography: real wars, theory wars , 1992 .

[49]  S. Harding Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives , 1993 .

[50]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  CommentJust the facts , 1991 .

[51]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  A View on the GIS Crisis in Geography, or, Using GIS to Put Humpty-Dumpty Back Together Again , 1991 .

[52]  R. Harris Rhetoric of Science. , 1991 .

[53]  M. Monmonier How to Lie with Maps , 1991 .

[54]  P. Taylor Editorial comment GKS , 1990 .

[55]  C. Lawrence The pasteurization of France , 1990, Medical History.

[56]  J. B. Harley,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP , 1989 .

[57]  B. Latour The pasteurization of France , 1988 .

[58]  D. Gregory,et al.  Recollections of a Revolution: Geography as Spatial Science , 1984 .

[59]  Reinhard Bendix,et al.  Max Weber An intellectual portrait , 1960 .

[60]  TWO-WEEK Loan COpy,et al.  University of California , 1886, The American journal of dental science.