Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments

The design and development of social robots that interact and assist people in daily life requires moving into unconstrained daily-life environments. This presents unexplored methodological challenges to robotic researchers. Is it possible, for example, to perform useful experiments in the uncontrolled conditions of everyday life environments? How long do these studies need to be to provide reliable results? What evaluations methods can be used?In this paper we present preliminary results on a study designed to evaluate an algorithm for social robots in relatively uncontrolled, daily life conditions. The study was conducted as part of the RUBI project, whose goal is to design and develop social robots by immersion in the environment in which the robots are supposed to operate. First we found that in spite of the relative chaotic conditions and lack of control existing in the daily activities of a child-care center, it is possible to perform experiments in a relatively short period of time and with reliable results. We found that continuous audience response methods borrowed from marketing research provided good inter-observer reliabilities, in the order of 70%, and temporal resolution (the cut-off frequency is in the order of 1 cycle per minute) at low cost (evaluation is performed continuously in real time). We also experimented with objective behavioral descriptions, like tracking children's movement across a room. These approaches complemented each other and provided a useful picture of the temporal dynamics of the child-robot interaction, allowing us to gather baseline data for evaluating future systems. Finally, we also touch the ongoing study of behavior analysis through 3 months long-term child-robot interaction.

[1]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Dance interaction with QRIO: a case study for non-boring interaction by using an entrainment ensemble model , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[2]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[4]  Mike Hess,et al.  QLikingQ Through Moment-To-Moment Evaluation; Identifying Key Selling Segments in Advertising , 1991 .

[5]  Yoshihiro Kuroki,et al.  Development of mechanical system for a small biped entertainment robot , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[6]  Hideki Kozima,et al.  Interactive robots for communication-care: a case-study in autism therapy , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[7]  Tetsuharu Fukushima,et al.  A small biped entertainment robot exploring human-robot interactive applications , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[8]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  SDR-4X II: A Small Humanoid as an Entertainer in Home Environment , 2003, ISRR.

[10]  J.R. Movellan,et al.  The RUBI/QRIO Project: Origins, Principles, and First Steps , 2005, Proceedings. The 4nd International Conference on Development and Learning, 2005..