The Logical Framework Approach-Millennium

The Logical Framework Approach (LFA) has proved to be a valuable tool for project approval, design, and evaluation. However, a few pitfalls make it hard to use within today's project management framework and to integrate with other project management tools. This article proposes an updated version of the LFA to improve its compatibility with today's corporate culture, project management framework, and tools. We propose to call the updated tool the Logical Framework Approach-Millennium (LFA-M). The LFA-M is a seven-step approach leading to the development of the Logframe-Millennium (LF-M), a five-column and four-line matrix describing major project commitments and providing an overall understanding of the project. It was successfully implemented at the Canadian Space Agency and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. The LFA-M fits well within today's project management framework and corporate culture and leads easily to other project management tools.

[1]  Gilroy Coleman,et al.  Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects , 1987 .

[2]  David Cordingley Integrating the logical framework into the management of technical co-operation projects , 1995 .

[3]  R. Sartorius The third generation Logical Framework Approach: dynamic management for agricultural research projects , 1996 .

[4]  Lucy Earle,et al.  Lost in the Matrix: The Logframe and the Local Picture , 2003 .

[5]  Reidar Dale,et al.  The logical framework: An easy escape, a straitjacket, or a useful planning tool? , 2003 .

[6]  Des Gasper 'Logical frameworks', a critical assessment: managerial theory, pluralistic practice , 1997 .

[7]  Steve Wiggins,et al.  Clarifying the 'logical framework' as a tool for planning and managing development projects , 1995 .

[8]  J. Aune,et al.  Logical Framework Approach and PRA - mutually exclusive or complementary tools for project planning? , 2000 .

[9]  Kenneth H. Rose,et al.  Book Review: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Fourth Edition , 2001 .

[10]  Jovica R. Riznic,et al.  Assessment of Steam Generator Tube Flaw Size and Leak Rate Models , 2009 .

[11]  Hellmut Eggers Integrated project cycle management: roots and perspectives , 1994 .

[12]  Jean Couillard,et al.  Assessing and controlling the quality of a project end product: the earned quality method , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[13]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター ロジックモデル策定ガイド = Logic model development guide , 2003 .

[14]  Des Gasper,et al.  Evaluating the "logical framework approach": towards learning-oriented development evaluation , 2000 .

[15]  David Baccarini,et al.  The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success , 1999 .