Relationships between invertebrate communities and both hydrological regime and other environmental factors across New Zealand's rivers

Robust relationships between biological characteristics and hydrological indices are required to provide a quantitative basis for environmental flows. Data from 1075 river sites distributed across New Zealand were used to investigate relationships between invertebrate communities and flow regimes, whilst also including the influence of additional environmental factors. Variance decomposition analysis was used to investigate the proportion of variance explained by hydrological, geomorphological, land cover, and catchment characteristics for the community matrix and each of three biotic indices representing taxon richness, Macroinvertebrate Community Index, and percentage of species in the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera orders. Results showed that hydrological regime contributes a unique component to the explainable variation in the community, but this contribution is overestimated if other explanatory factors are not considered. A gradient forest model comprised of 93 random forest models, each predicting the probability of occurrence of a taxon, indicated the importance of high flows and also other dimensions of hydrological variation for predicting invertebrate taxa and biotic indices. Although many freshwater invertebrates in New Zealand are well adapted to a range of flow conditions through resistance traits and/or rapid colonization, this study suggests that several aspects of the flow regime influence invertebrate communities. These results suggest that environmental flows may be designed to sustain or even optimize specific ecological attributes or taxa, but changes along several dimensions of hydrological variability are likely to disadvantage other taxa and change invertebrate community composition. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Death,et al.  Control of freshwater fish and crayfish community structure in Taranaki, New Zealand: dams, diadromy or habitat structure? , 2001 .

[2]  P. Legendre,et al.  Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. , 2006, Ecology.

[3]  F. Cattanéo.  Does hydrology constrain the structure of fish assemblages in French streams? Regional scale analysis , 2005 .

[4]  P. McIntyre,et al.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity , 2010, Nature.

[5]  B. Biggs,et al.  Flow variables for ecological studies in temperate streams: groupings based on covariance , 2000 .

[6]  B. Biggs,et al.  Application of the ‘natural flow paradigm’ in a New Zealand context , 2009 .

[7]  Ian Phillip Vaughan,et al.  Linking ecological and hydromorphological data: approaches, challenges and future prospects for riverine science , 2010 .

[8]  R. Death,et al.  A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates , 2007, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  C. Pearson,et al.  Changes to New Zealand's national hydrometric network in the 1990s , 1998 .

[10]  E. Graynoth,et al.  Relative influence of local and landscape-scale features on the density and habitat preferences of longfin and shortfin eels , 2013 .

[11]  Tenna Riis,et al.  Hydrologic and hydraulic control of macrophyte establishment and performance in streams , 2003 .

[12]  Kevin J. Collier,et al.  Influence of substrate type and physico‐chemical conditions on macroinvertebrate faunas and biotic indices of some lowland Waikato, New Zealand, streams , 1998 .

[13]  M. Winterbourn,et al.  Are New Zealand stream ecosystems really different , 1981 .

[14]  Andrew J. H. Davey,et al.  A Comparison of Composite Habitat Suitability Indices and Generalized Additive Models of Invertebrate Abundance and Fish Presence–Habitat Availability , 2007 .

[15]  D. M. Balbi,et al.  River flow indexing using british benthic macroinvertebrates : A framework for setting hydroecological objectives , 1999 .

[16]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[17]  D. Hannah,et al.  How does macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution influence ecohydrological relationships in riverine ecosystems , 2012 .

[18]  R. Paine,et al.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  W. Sousa.  The Role of Disturbance in Natural Communities , 1984 .

[20]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Landscape Filters and Species Traits: Towards Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction in Stream Ecology , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[21]  Andrew J. Boulton,et al.  Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages , 2003 .

[22]  Maurice J. Duncan,et al.  Flow variability in New Zealand rivers and its relationship to in‐stream habitat and biota , 1990 .

[23]  T. Hastie,et al.  Using multivariate adaptive regression splines to predict the distributions of New Zealand ’ s freshwater diadromous fish , 2005 .

[24]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria: Modeling in the presence of spatial autocorrelation , 1988 .

[25]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences , 2003 .

[26]  G. Edgar,et al.  Predictions of beta diversity for reef macroalgae across southeastern Australia , 2011 .

[27]  J. Tukey,et al.  Variations of Box Plots , 1978 .

[28]  A. Hildrew,et al.  Mobility of stream invertebrates in relation to disturbance and refugia: a test of habitat templet theory , 2003, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[29]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[30]  Jerome H Friedman,et al.  Multiple additive regression trees with application in epidemiology , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  Carolin Strobl,et al.  The behaviour of random forest permutation-based variable importance measures under predictor correlation , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[32]  John R. Leathwick,et al.  Quantifying relationships between land-use gradients and structural and functional indicators of stream ecological integrity , 2012 .

[33]  Ton H. Snelder,et al.  Comparing methods for estimating flow duration curves at ungauged sites , 2012 .

[34]  D. Booker.  Spatial and temporal patterns in the frequency of events exceeding three times the median flow (FRE3) across New Zealand , 2013 .

[35]  B. Biggs,et al.  Taxon-specific responses to high-flow disturbance in streams:implications for population persistence , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[36]  P. Sagar,et al.  Food and feeding of small fish in the Rakaia River, New Zealand , 1983 .

[37]  J. Elith,et al.  Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment , 2007 .

[38]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[39]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  Co‐variation of fish assemblages, flow regimes and other habitat factors in French rivers , 2010 .

[40]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[41]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[42]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Linking the hydraulic world of individual organisms to ecological processes: Putting ecology into ecohydraulics , 2010 .

[43]  M. Dunbar,et al.  Interaction between macroinvertebrates, discharge and physical habitat in upland rivers , 2010 .

[44]  J. Olden,et al.  Placing global stream flow variability in geographic and geomorphic contexts , 2006 .

[45]  J. Allan,et al.  Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability , 1995 .

[46]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[47]  J. Olden,et al.  Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  N. Poff,et al.  Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows , 2010 .

[49]  S. Dolédec,et al.  The intermediate disturbance hypothesis, refugia, and biodiversity in streams , 1997 .

[50]  I. Jowett,et al.  Effects of floods versus low flows on invertebrates in a New Zealand gravel‐bed river , 2006 .

[51]  Stephen J. Smith,et al.  Gradient forests: calculating importance gradients on physical predictors. , 2012, Ecology.

[52]  J. Quinn,et al.  New Zealand's National River Water Quality Network: Long‐term trends in macroinvertebrate communities , 2000 .

[53]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[54]  B. Biggs,et al.  Distributional responses to flow disturbance by a stream-dwelling snail , 1999 .

[55]  Sovan Lek,et al.  Energy availability and habitat heterogeneity predict global riverine fish diversity , 1998, Nature.

[56]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community Ecology , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[57]  M. Harmon,et al.  Ecological Variability in Space and Time: Insights Gained from the US LTER Program , 2003 .

[58]  N. Holmes.  The importance of long-term data sets in science and river management , 2006 .

[59]  B. Biggs,et al.  Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams , 1997 .

[60]  R. Death,et al.  Environmental Stability and Community Persistence: A Multivariate Perspective , 1994, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[61]  R. Horwitz.  Temporal Variability Patterns and the Distributional Patterns of Stream Fishes , 1978 .

[62]  D. Hannah,et al.  Selection of river flow indices for the assessment of hydroecological change , 2007 .

[63]  J. Paruelo,et al.  How to evaluate models : Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? , 2008 .

[64]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards , 2007 .

[65]  D. Hannah,et al.  Flow variability and macroinvertebrate community response within riverine systems , 2006 .

[66]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[67]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  PREDICTABILITY, CONSTANCY, AND CONTINGENCY OF PERIODIC PHENOMENA' , 1974 .

[68]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[69]  Ton H. Snelder,et al.  NATURAL FLOW REGIME CLASSIFICATIONS ARE SENSITIVE TO DEFINITION PROCEDURES , 2013 .

[70]  R. Death,et al.  Measuring stream macroinvertebrate responses to gradients of vegetation cover: when is enough enough? , 2009 .

[71]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[72]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[73]  D. G. Smith,et al.  New Zealand's National Water Quality Monitoring Network - Design and First Year's Operation , 1990 .

[74]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[75]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article Conditional variable importance for random forests , 2008 .

[76]  Benthic community dynamics during summer low‐flows in two rivers of contrasting enrichment 2. Invertebrates , 2003 .

[77]  R. Woods,et al.  Comparing and combining physically-based and empirically-based approaches for estimating the hydrology of ungauged catchments , 2014 .

[78]  C. Revenga,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems , 2005, Science.

[79]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Incorporating ecological knowledge into ecoinformatics: An example of modeling hierarchically structured aquatic communities with neural networks , 2006, Ecol. Informatics.

[80]  P. Angermeier,et al.  Local vs. regional influences on local diversity in stream fish communities of Virginia , 1998 .

[81]  R. Death,et al.  Diversity Patterns in Stream Benthic Invertebrate Communities: The Influence of Habitat Stability , 1995 .

[82]  TRANSFERABILITY OF HYDRAULIC PREFERENCE MODELS FOR AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATES , 2013 .

[83]  Ton H. Snelder,et al.  MULTISCALE RIVER ENVIRONMENT CLASSIFICATION FOR WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 1 , 2002 .

[84]  D. J. Booker.  Predicting wetted width in any river at any discharge , 2010 .

[85]  J. Olden,et al.  Fish response to the temporal hierarchy of the natural flow regime in the Daly River, northern Australia. , 2011, Journal of fish biology.

[86]  David M. Hannah,et al.  Macroinvertebrate community response to inter‐annual and regional river flow regime dynamics , 2008 .

[87]  A. Suren,et al.  The effects of plant growth on stream invertebrate communities during low flow: a conceptual model , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[88]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[89]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  Predicting community characteristics from habitat conditions: fluvial fish and hydraulics , 1999 .

[90]  Morten Lauge Pedersen,et al.  River discharge and local-scale physical habitat influence macroinvertebrate LIFE scores , 2010 .

[91]  D. Booker,et al.  Quantifying the direct and indirect effects of flow‐related disturbance on stream fish assemblages , 2013 .

[92]  R. Sponseller,et al.  Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities , 2001 .

[93]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists 1st edition , 2005 .

[94]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[95]  B. Biggs,et al.  Ecological characterisation, classification, and modelling of New Zealand rivers: An introduction and synthesis , 1990 .

[96]  Martin C. Miller,et al.  Threshold of sediment motion under unidirectional currents , 1977 .

[97]  J. Whittaker.  Model Interpretation from the Additive Elements of the Likelihood Function , 1984 .

[98]  D. Montgomery.  PROCESS DOMAINS AND THE RIVER CONTINUUM 1 , 1999 .

[99]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[100]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[101]  Mike R. Scarsbrook,et al.  Quantifying Disturbance in Streams: Alternative Measures of Disturbance in Relation to Macroinvertebrate Species Traits and Species Richness , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[102]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[103]  Jane Elith,et al.  Use of generalised dissimilarity modelling to improve the biological discrimination of river and stream classifications , 2011 .

[104]  C. Townsend,et al.  Resistance, resilience, and patchiness of invertebrate assemblages in native tussock and pasture streams in New Zealand after a hydrological disturbance , 2003 .

[105]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[106]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology , 2012 .

[107]  J. Quinn,et al.  Characterisation and classification of benthic invertebrate communities in 88 New Zealand rivers in relation to environmental factors , 1990 .

[108]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Dispersal, disturbance and the contrasting biogeographies of New Zealand’s diadromous and non‐diadromous fish species , 2008 .