OPF solution for a real Czech urban meshed distribution network using a genetic algorithm

Abstract Electrical distribution networks are facing an energy transition which entails an increase of decentralised renewable energy sources and electric vehicles. The resulting temporal and spatial uncertainty in the generation/load patterns challenges the operations of an infrastructure not designed for such a transition. In this situation, Optimal Power Flow methods can play a key role in identifying system weak points and supporting efficient management of the electrical networks, including the distribution level. In this work, to support distribution system operators’ decision-making process, we aim at attaining a quasi-optimal solution in the shortest time possible in an electrical network experiencing a large growth of distributed energy sources. We propose an optimisation method based on a modified version of a genetic algorithm and the Python pandapower package. The method is tested on a model of a real urban meshed network of a large Czech city. The optimisation method minimises the total operating costs of the distribution network by controlling selected network components and parameters, namely the transformer tap changers and the active power demand at consumption nodes. The results of our method are compared with the exact solution showing that a close-to-optimal solution of the observed problem can be reached in a relatively short time.

[1]  T. W. Sze,et al.  Some Applications of a New Approach to Loss Minimization in Electrical Utility Systems , 1958, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[3]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[4]  Constantin Bulac,et al.  New evolutionary algorithm method for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Electricity (ICATE).

[5]  John E. Angus,et al.  Optimal mutation probability for genetic algorithms , 1995 .

[6]  Stanislav Misak,et al.  Review of Trends and Targets of Complex Systems for Power System Optimization , 2020 .

[7]  Giuseppe Prettico,et al.  Distribution Network Model Platform: A First Case Study , 2019, Energies.

[8]  Florin Capitanescu,et al.  Critical review of recent advances and further developments needed in AC optimal power flow , 2016 .

[9]  Shengsong Liu,et al.  Weighted gradient direction based chaos optimization algorithm for nonlinear programming problem , 2002, Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (Cat. No.02EX527).

[10]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Optimal Power Flow Based on Genetic Algorithms and Clustering Techniques , 2018, 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[11]  Florian Schäfer,et al.  Pandapower—An Open-Source Python Tool for Convenient Modeling, Analysis, and Optimization of Electric Power Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  William F. Tinney,et al.  Optimal Power Flow Solutions , 1968 .

[14]  P. Sreejaya,et al.  Reactive power and Voltage Control in Kerala Grid and Optimization of Control Variables Using Genetic Algorithm , 2008, 2008 Joint International Conference on Power System Technology and IEEE Power India Conference.

[15]  J. Ramos,et al.  State-of-the-art, challenges, and future trends in security constrained optimal power flow , 2011 .

[16]  Darrell Whitley,et al.  A genetic algorithm tutorial , 1994, Statistics and Computing.

[17]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  A Two-Level Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Cascading Outages , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Salah Kamel,et al.  Optimal Power Flow Using Recent Optimization Techniques , 2018 .