How do students misunderstand number representations?

We used both student interviews and diagnostic testing to reveal students’ misconceptions about number representations in computing systems. This article reveals that students who have passed an undergraduate level computer organization course still possess surprising misconceptions about positional notations, two's complement representation, and overflow. Contrary to common opinion, these misconceptions are widespread and reveal the need for instruction that specifically targets these misconceptions. In addition, these misconceptions will serve as the basis for the creation of a standard assessment tool called the digital logic concept inventory. This concept inventory will provide a rigorous and quantitative metric to assess the effectiveness of new teaching methods.

[1]  Mordechai Ben-Ari,et al.  The concorde doesn't fly anymore , 2005, SIGCSE '05.

[2]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Reframing the Conceptual Change Approach in Learning and Instruction , 2007 .

[3]  V. Steinle.  Changes with Age in Student Misconceptions of Decimal Numbers , 2008 .

[4]  John F. Wakerly,et al.  Digital design - principles and practices , 1990, Prentice Hall Series in computer engineering.

[5]  Zvonko G. Vranesic,et al.  Fundamentals of Digital Logic with VHDL Design , 2008 .

[6]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[7]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Creating the digital logic concept inventory , 2010, SIGCSE.

[8]  E. Fischbein,et al.  THE ROLE OF IMPLICIT MODELS IN SOLVING VERBAL PROBLEMS IN MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION , 1985 .

[9]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Flip-Flops in Students' Conceptions of State , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[10]  Doug Baldwin,et al.  Guest Editors’ Introduction: Computer Science in the Liberal Arts , 2010, TOCE.

[11]  Alan B. Marcovitz.  Introduction to Logic and Computer Design , 2007 .

[12]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[13]  B. Moskal,et al.  Making Sense of What Students Know: Examining the Referents, Relationships and Modes Students Displayed in Response to a Decimal Task , 2000 .

[14]  W. Wollman,et al.  DETERMINING THE SOURCES OF ERROR IN A TRANSLATION FROM SENTENCE TO EQUATION , 1983 .

[15]  Francois Léonard,et al.  Intermediate Cognitive Organizations in the Process of Learning a Mathematical Concept: The Order of Positive Decimal Numbers , 1985 .

[16]  Rina Zazkis,et al.  On fractions and non-standard representations: Pre-service teachers' concepts , 1994 .

[17]  Mordechai Ben-Ari.  The concorde doesn't fly anymore , 2004, SIGCSE '04.

[18]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[19]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Proof by incomplete enumeration and other logical misconceptions , 2008, ICER '08.

[20]  T. Reed-Rhoads,et al.  Progress on concept inventory assessment tools , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[21]  Enoch O. Hwang,et al.  Digital Logic and Microprocessor Design with VHDL , 2005 .

[22]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  How Many Numbers are there in a Rational Numbers Interval? Constraints, Synthetic Models and the Effect of the Number Line , 2007 .

[23]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[24]  Wolfgang Henseler,et al.  Digital Design , 2003 .

[25]  Mary Catherine O'Connor,et al.  “Can any Fraction be Turned into a Decimal?” A Case Study of a Mathematical Group Discussion , 2002 .

[26]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  Changes with age in students’ conceptions of decimal notation , 1997 .

[27]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Students' Misconceptions About Medium-Scale Integrated Circuits , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[28]  Herbert Hellerman,et al.  Digital Computer System Principles , 1967 .

[29]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[30]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Work in progress - students' misconceptions about state in digital systems , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[31]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Describing the What and Why of Students’ Difficulties in Boolean Logic , 2012, TOCE.

[32]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[33]  J. M. Clement,et al.  A Call for Action (Research): Applying Science Education Research to Computer Science Instruction , 2004, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[34]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[35]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Administering a Digital Logic Concept Inventory at Multiple Institutions , 2011 .

[36]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions , 2004 .

[37]  Donald D. Givone.  Digital Principles and Design , 2002 .

[38]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[39]  Mile K. Stojcev.  Introduction to Computing Systems: From Bits and Gates to C and Beyond, Yale N. Patt, Sanjay J. Patel. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston (2004), Softcover, pp. 632, plus XXIV, ISBN: 0-07-121503-4 , 2005 .

[40]  John J. Clement,et al.  Algebra Word Problem Solutions: Thought Processes Underlying a Common Misconception , 1982 .

[41]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Number concept and conceptual change: towards a systemic model of the processes of change , 2004 .

[42]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Setting the Scope of Concept Inventories for Introductory Computing Subjects , 2010, TOCE.

[43]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Work in progress — How do engineering students misunderstand number representations? , 2010, 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[44]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[45]  Jose P. Mestre.  Facts and Myths about Pedagogies of Engagement in Science Learning , 2005 .