Applying different scenarios for landslide spatial modeling using computational intelligence methods

Landslides every year impose extensive damages to human beings in various parts of the world; therefore, identifying prone areas to landslides for preventive measures is essential. The main purpose of this research is applying different scenarios for landslide susceptibility mapping by means of combination of bivariate statistical (frequency ratio) and computational intelligence methods (random forest and support vector machine) in landslide polygon and point formats. For this purpose, in the first step, a total of 294 landslide locations were determined from various sources such as aerial photographs, satellite images, and field surveys. Landslide inventory was randomly split into a testing dataset 70% (206 landslide locations) for training the different scenarios, and the remaining 30% (88 landslides locations) was used for validation purposes. To providing landslide susceptibility maps, 13 conditioning factors including altitude, slope angle, plan curvature, slope aspect, topographic wetness index, lithology, land use/land cover, distance from rivers, drainage density, distance from fault, distance from roads, convergence index, and annual rainfall are used. Tolerance and the variance inflation factor indices were used for considering multi-collinearity of conditioning factors. Results indicated that the smallest tolerance and highest variance inflation factor were 0.31 and 3.20, respectively. Subsequently, spatial relationship between classes of each landslide conditioning factor and landslides was obtained by frequency ratio (FR) model. Also, importance of the mentioned factors was obtained by random forest (RF) as a machine learning technique. The results showed that according to mean decrease accuracy, factors of altitude, aspect, drainage density, and distance from rivers had the greatest effect on the occurrence of landslide in the study area. Finally, the landslide susceptibility maps were produced by ten scenarios according to different ensembles. The receiver operating characteristics, including the area under the curve (AUC), were used to assess the accuracy of the models. Results of validation of scenarios showed that AUC was varying from 0.668 to 0.749. Also, FR and seed cell area index indicators show a high correlation between the susceptibility classes with the landslide pixels and field observations in all scenarios except scenarios 10RF and 10SVM. The results of this study can be used for landslides management and mitigation and development activities such as construction of settlements and infrastructure in the future.

[1]  A. Kornejady,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment using three bivariate models considering the new topo-hydrological factor: HAND , 2018 .

[2]  H. Pourghasemi,et al.  Performance assessment of individual and ensemble data-mining techniques for gully erosion modeling. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Tree Species Classification with Random Forest Using Very High Spatial Resolution 8-Band WorldView-2 Satellite Data , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using random forest weight at basin scale , 2018 .

[5]  Wei Chen,et al.  A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping , 2017 .

[6]  V. Moosavi,et al.  Development of hybrid wavelet packet-statistical models (WP-SM) for landslide susceptibility mapping , 2016, Landslides.

[7]  Hamid Reza Pourghasemi,et al.  Groundwater qanat potential mapping using frequency ratio and Shannon’s entropy models in the Moghan watershed, Iran , 2015, Earth Science Informatics.

[8]  Richard Dikau,et al.  Regional-scale controls on the spatial activity of rockfalls (Turtmann Valley, Swiss Alps) — A multivariate modeling approach , 2017 .

[9]  S. Keesstra,et al.  Landslide model performance in a high resolution small-scale landscape , 2013 .

[10]  T. Kavzoglu,et al.  Susceptibility mapping of shallow landslides using kernel-based Gaussian process, support vector machines and logistic regression , 2016 .

[11]  Wei Chen,et al.  Application of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and evidential belief function models in landslide susceptibility mapping , 2016 .

[12]  J. Iqbal,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping using an integrated model of information value method and logistic regression in the Bailongjiang watershed, Gansu Province, China , 2017, Journal of Mountain Science.

[13]  F. Guzzetti,et al.  Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem , 2012 .

[14]  Pete Smith,et al.  FORUM paper: The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) , 2016 .

[15]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Using statistical learning algorithms in regional landslide susceptibility zonation with limited landslide field data , 2015, Journal of Mountain Science.

[16]  Dimitrios Myronidis,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[17]  S. Keesstra,et al.  An economic, perception and biophysical approach to the use of oat straw as mulch in Mediterranean rainfed agriculture land , 2017 .

[18]  Alessandro Pasuto,et al.  Collecting data to define future hazard scenarios of the Tessina landslide , 2000 .

[19]  Xia Yuan-you,et al.  Systematic analysis of risk evaluation of landslide hazard , 2005 .

[20]  Hyeong-Dong Park,et al.  GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Seoul, South Korea, applying the radius of influence to frequency ratio analysis , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[21]  Zohre Sadat Pourtaghi,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment in Lianhua County (China); a comparison between a random forest data mining technique and bivariate and multivariate statistical models , 2016 .

[22]  Johan Bouma,et al.  The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations sustainable development goals , 2016 .

[23]  C. Gokceoglu,et al.  GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping with probabilistic likelihood ratio and spatial multi-criteria evaluation models (North of Tehran, Iran) , 2014, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[24]  H. Pourghasemi,et al.  Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province, Iran , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[25]  R. Rongo,et al.  Simulation of the 1992 Tessina landslide by a cellular automata model and future hazard scenarios , 2000 .

[27]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy , 2016 .

[28]  Hayley J. Fowler,et al.  Assessing long term flash flooding frequency using historical information , 2017 .

[29]  Fu Ren,et al.  Application of wavelet analysis and a particle swarm-optimized support vector machine to predict the displacement of the Shuping landslide in the Three Gorges, China , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[30]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[31]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models , 2010 .

[32]  Ruiqing Niu,et al.  The assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and decision tree methods in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China , 2017, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[33]  Mustafa Neamah Jebur,et al.  Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Luxi area (China) using support vector machines , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[34]  M. Komac A landslide susceptibility model using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia , 2006 .

[35]  Liangjie Wang,et al.  A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps using logistic regression, frequency ratio, decision tree, weights of evidence and artificial neural network , 2016, Geosciences Journal.

[36]  Mukta Sharma,et al.  Landslide Susceptibility Zonation through ratings derived from Artificial Neural Network , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[37]  Qiqing Wang,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China , 2016, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[38]  Nhat-Duc Hoang,et al.  Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using hybrid integration approach of Least-Squares Support Vector Machines and differential evolution optimization: a case study in Central Vietnam , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[39]  Mauro Fiorentino,et al.  Informational entropy of fractal river networks , 1996 .

[40]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Support vector machine , 2013 .

[41]  Saro Lee,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea , 2018 .

[42]  Chin-Tung Cheng,et al.  Landslide Susceptibility Map , 2013 .

[43]  Fausto Guzzetti,et al.  Forecasting natural hazards, performance of scientists, ethics, and the need for transparency , 2015, Toxicological and environmental chemistry.

[44]  M. Seeger,et al.  Soil erosion in sloping vineyards under conventional and organic land use managements (Saar-Mosel Valley, Germany) , 2017 .

[45]  H. Pourghasemi,et al.  Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: Which algorithm, which precision? , 2018 .

[46]  Yacine Achour,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping using analytic hierarchy process and information value methods along a highway road section in Constantine, Algeria , 2017, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[47]  Javier Casalí,et al.  Soil erosion in sloping vineyards assessed by using botanical indicators and sediment collectors in the Ruwer-Mosel valley , 2016 .

[48]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[49]  D. Rozos,et al.  Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system and analytic hierarchy process methods, upon landslide susceptibility mapping, using GIS: a case study from the Eastern Achaia County of Peloponnesus, Greece , 2011 .

[50]  Mass Movement Susceptibility Mapping Using Satellite Optical Imagery Compared With INSAR Monitoring: Zigui County, Three Gorges Region, China , 2010 .

[51]  Thomas Glade,et al.  Analysis of land cover changes in the past and the future as contribution to landslide risk scenarios , 2014 .

[52]  R. Sidle,et al.  Landslides: Processes, Prediction, and Land Use , 2006 .

[54]  Guo-feng Zhu,et al.  Relationship between sub-cloud secondary evaporation and stable isotope in precipitation in different regions of China , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[55]  Albert K. W. Yeung,et al.  Concepts And Techniques Of Geographic Information Systems , 2002 .

[56]  Masoud Monjezi,et al.  Prediction of seismic slope stability through combination of particle swarm optimization and neural network , 2015, Engineering with Computers.

[57]  H. Pourghasemi,et al.  An integrated artificial neural network model for the landslide susceptibility assessment of Osado Island, Japan , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[58]  Ahmed M. Youssef,et al.  Landslide susceptibility delineation in the Ar-Rayth area, Jizan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, using analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and logistic regression models , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[59]  Saro Lee,et al.  A Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Gangwon Province, Korea , 2017 .

[60]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[61]  Jingyi Zhang,et al.  An Improved Information Value Model Based on Gray Clustering for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[62]  M. Marjanović,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm , 2011 .

[63]  A. A. Kamil,et al.  Landslide Hazard Mapping Using a Poisson Distribution: A Case Study in Penang Island, Malaysia , 2014 .

[64]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Relationship between water-conservation behavior and water education in Guangzhou, China , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[65]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  GIS-based ordered weighted averaging and Dempster–Shafer methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Urmia Lake Basin, Iran , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[66]  C. Gokceoğlu,et al.  Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach , 2002 .

[67]  Saskia Keesstra,et al.  Assessment of soil particle erodibility and sediment trapping using check dams in small semi-arid catchments , 2017 .

[68]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: A comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models , 2012 .

[69]  P. Aleotti,et al.  Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives , 1999 .

[70]  Xin-sheng Wei,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment using the certainty factor and analytic hierarchy process , 2017, Journal of Mountain Science.

[71]  B. Pradhan,et al.  A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility , 2017 .

[72]  S. Keesstra,et al.  The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[73]  Xiaoqin Li,et al.  GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and certainty factor (CF) models for the Baozhong region of Baoji City, China , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[74]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[75]  Hengxing Lan,et al.  A modified frequency ratio method for landslide susceptibility assessment , 2017, Landslides.

[76]  I. Armaș,et al.  Landslide susceptibility deterministic approach using geographic information systems: application to Breaza town, Romania , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[77]  Wei Chen,et al.  Landslide spatial modeling: Introducing new ensembles of ANN, MaxEnt, and SVM machine learning techniques , 2017 .

[78]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.