A framework for uncertainty and risk analysis in Total Maximum Daily Load applications

In the United States, the computation of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) must include a Margin of Safety (MOS) to account for different sources of uncertainty. In practice however, TMDL studies rarely include an explicit uncertainty analysis and the estimation of the MOS is often subjective and even arbitrary. Such approaches are difficult to replicate and preclude the comparison of results between studies. To overcome these limitations, a Bayesian framework to compute TMDLs and MOSs including an explicit evaluation of uncertainty and risk is proposed in this investigation. The proposed framework uses the concept of Predictive Uncertainty to calculate a TMDL from an equation of allowable risk of non-compliance of a target water quality standard. The framework is illustrated in a synthetic example and in a real TMDL study for nutrients in Sawgrass Lake, Florida.

[1]  Christina W. Tsai,et al.  Incorporating Reliability into the Definition of the Margin of Safety in Total Maximum Daily Load Calculations , 2008 .

[2]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[3]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Risk and reliability analysis , 2007 .

[4]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[5]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Integrated hydrodynamic and water quality modeling system to support nutrient total maximum daily load development for Wissahickon Creek, Pennsylvania , 2006 .

[6]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  UNCERTAINTY IN TMDL MODELS , 2006 .

[7]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model , 1999 .

[8]  James L. Martin,et al.  THE WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS SIMULATION PROGRAM, WASP5 PART A: MODEL DOCUMENTATION , 1993 .

[9]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Recent developments in predictive uncertainty assessment based on the model conditional processor approach , 2010 .

[10]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Hydrologic uncertainty processor for probabilistic river stage forecasting , 2000 .

[11]  S. Chapra.  Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[12]  Rene A. Camacho,et al.  A Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Uncertainty Analysis in Hydraulic and Hydrodynamic Modeling , 2015 .

[13]  Thierry Alex Mara,et al.  A comparison of two Bayesian approaches for uncertainty quantification , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Identification of likelihood and prior dependence structures for hydrologic uncertainty processor , 2004 .

[15]  David W. Dilks,et al.  Development of Bayesian Monte Carlo techniques for water quality model uncertainty , 1992 .

[16]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[17]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Predictive uncertainty assessment in real time flood forecasting , 2009 .

[18]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  A software tool for translating deterministic model results into probabilistic assessments of water quality standard compliance , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Upmanu Lall,et al.  Developing Total Maximum Daily Loads Under Uncertainty: Decision Analysis and the Margin of Safety , 2008 .

[20]  D. Langseth,et al.  Risk-Based Margins of Safety for Phosphorus TMDLs in Lakes , 2011 .

[21]  David W. Dilks,et al.  Improved consideration of the margin of safety in total maximum daily load development , 2004 .

[22]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Uncertainty estimates by Bayesian method with likelihood of AR (1) plus Normal model and AR (1) plus Multi-Normal model in different time-scales hydrological models , 2011 .

[23]  P. Mantovan,et al.  Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology , 2006 .

[24]  Harry X. Zhang,et al.  APPLYING THE FIRST-ORDER ERROR ANALYSIS IN DETERMINING THE MARGIN OF SAFETY FOR TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD COMPUTATIONS , 2004 .

[25]  Kenneth H. Reckhow.  On the Need for Uncertainty Assessment in TMDL Modeling and Implementation , 2003 .

[26]  Ezio Todini,et al.  A model conditional processor to assess predictive uncertainty in flood forecasting , 2008 .

[27]  J. Vrugt,et al.  A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non‐Gaussian errors , 2010 .

[28]  Tae-Young Heo,et al.  Modeling metal-sediment interaction processes: Parameter sensitivity assessment and uncertainty analysis , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Haifeng Jia,et al.  A Bayesian approach for evaluation of the effect of water quality model parameter uncertainty on TMDLs: A case study of Miyun Reservoir. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  Mohamed M. Hantush,et al.  Bayesian Framework for Water Quality Model Uncertainty Estimation and Risk Management , 2014 .

[31]  C. Stow,et al.  Predicting the frequency of water quality standard violations: a probabilistic approach for TMDL development. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Daeryong Park,et al.  Evaluation of pollutant loads from stormwater BMPs to receiving water using load frequency curves with uncertainty analysis. , 2012, Water research.

[33]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  On Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian inference , 2003 .

[34]  Kenneth H. Reckhow,et al.  An evaluation of automated structure learning with Bayesian networks: An application to estuarine chlorophyll dynamics , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[35]  Rene A. Camacho,et al.  Modeling the Factors Controlling Phytoplankton in the St. Louis Bay Estuary, Mississippi and Evaluating Estuarine Responses to Nutrient Load Modifications , 2015 .

[36]  U. Aswathanarayana,et al.  Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management , 2001 .

[37]  A. Patil,et al.  Bayesian approach to estimating margin of safety for total maximum daily load development. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  James L. Martin,et al.  Hydrodynamics and Transport for Water Quality Modeling , 1998 .

[39]  Dingjiang Chen,et al.  A Bayesian approach for calculating variable total maximum daily loads and uncertainty assessment. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.