Normalization procedure for relaxation studies in NMR quantum information processing

NMR quantum information processing studies rely on the reconstruction of the density matrix representing the so-called pseudo-pure states (PPS). An initially pure part of a PPS state undergoes unitary and non-unitary (relaxation) transformations during a computation process, causing a “loss of purity” until the equilibrium is reached. Besides, upon relaxation, the nuclear polarization varies in time, a fact which must be taken into account when comparing density matrices at different instants. Attempting to use time-fixed normalization procedures when relaxation is present, leads to various anomalies on matrices populations. On this paper we propose a method which takes into account the time-dependence of the normalization factor. From a generic form for the deviation density matrix an expression for the relaxing initial pure state is deduced. The method is exemplified with an experiment of relaxation of the concurrence of a pseudo-entangled state, which exhibits the phenomenon of sudden death, and the relaxation of the Wigner function of a pseudo-cat state.

[1]  Dieter Suter,et al.  Spins as qubits: quantum information processing by nuclear magnetic resonance. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[2]  Nicolaas P. Landsman Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition , 2009 .

[3]  J. V. D. Maarel Relaxation of spin quantum number S=3/2 under multiple‐pulse quadrupolar echoes , 1991 .

[4]  Jair C. C. Freitas,et al.  NMR Quantum Information Processing , 2007 .

[5]  J. Paz,et al.  Course 8: Environment-Induced Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical , 2000, quant-ph/0010011.

[6]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy , 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[7]  W. Wootters Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits , 1997, quant-ph/9709029.

[8]  J Laurat,et al.  Heralded entanglement between atomic ensembles: preparation, decoherence, and scaling. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[9]  I. S. Oliveira,et al.  Quantum state tomography for quadrupolar nuclei using global rotations of the spin system. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  I. S. Oliveira,et al.  A study of the relaxation dynamics in a quadrupolar NMR system using Quantum State Tomography. , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[11]  Christoph Simon,et al.  Robustness of multiparty entanglement , 2002 .

[12]  J. H. Eberly,et al.  Phonon decoherence of quantum entanglement: Robust and fragile states , 2002 .

[13]  L. Vandersypen,et al.  NMR techniques for quantum control and computation , 2004, quant-ph/0404064.

[14]  Quantum computers in phase space , 2002, quant-ph/0204149.

[15]  L. Davidovich,et al.  Experimental investigation of the dynamics of entanglement : Sudden death, complementarity, and continuous monitoring of the environment , 2008, 0804.4556.

[16]  Michael K. Henry,et al.  Localization in the quantum sawtooth map emulated on a quantum-information processor , 2005, quant-ph/0512204.

[17]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Design of strongly modulating pulses to implement precise effective Hamiltonians for quantum information processing , 2002, quant-ph/0202065.

[18]  P. Nägele,et al.  Dynamics of dissipative coupled spins: decoherence, relaxation and effects of a spin-boson bath , 2008 .

[19]  T. Yu,et al.  Sudden Death of Entanglement , 2009, Science.

[20]  W. Zurek Environment-induced superselection rules , 1982 .

[21]  S. Popescu,et al.  Good dynamics versus bad kinematics: is entanglement needed for quantum computation? , 1999, Physical review letters.

[22]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Robust method for estimating the Lindblad operators of a dissipative quantum process from measurements of the density operator at multiple time points , 2003 .

[23]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Method for modeling decoherence on a quantum-information processor , 2003, quant-ph/0303115.

[24]  Ting Yu,et al.  Evolution from entanglement to decoherence of bipartite mixed "X" states , 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[25]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[26]  R. Jozsa,et al.  SEPARABILITY OF VERY NOISY MIXED STATES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NMR QUANTUM COMPUTING , 1998, quant-ph/9811018.

[27]  Reading entanglement in terms of spin configurations in quantum magnets , 2005, cond-mat/0505280.

[28]  I. S. Oliveira,et al.  Relaxation of coherent states in a two-qubit NMR quadrupole system , 2003 .

[29]  H. Carr,et al.  The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism , 1961 .

[30]  W Dür,et al.  Stability of macroscopic entanglement under decoherence. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[31]  W. Zurek Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited , 2003, quant-ph/0306072.

[32]  Dieter Suter,et al.  Spins as qubits , 2008 .

[33]  W. Wootters A Wigner-function formulation of finite-state quantum mechanics , 1987 .

[34]  W. Zurek II. Quantum mechanics and measurement theoryEnvironment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical , 1993 .

[35]  Marcos Saraceno,et al.  Phase space contraction and quantum operations , 2005 .