Training Intensity Affects Motor Rehabilitation Efficacy Following Unilateral Ischemic Insult of the Sensorimotor Cortex in C57BL/6 Mice

Background. Motor rehabilitative training improves behavioral functionality and promotes beneficial neural reorganization following stroke but is often insufficient to normalize function. Rodent studies have relied on skilled reaching tasks to model motor rehabilitation and explore factors contributing to its efficacy. It has been found that greater training intensity (sessions/day) and duration (training days) facilitates motor skill learning in intact animals. Whether rehabilitative training efficacy varies with intensity following stroke is unclear. Methods. Mice were trained preoperatively on a skilled reaching task. Following focal ischemic lesions, mice received rehabilitative training either twice daily (high intensity [HI]), once daily (low intensity [LI]), or not at all (control) to determine the effects of rehabilitative training intensity on skilled motor performance. Results. Within 7 days, the HI-trained mice achieved preischemic levels of performance. Mice receiving LI training eventually reached similar performance levels but required a greater quantity of training. Training intensity did not consistently affect the maintenance of performance gains, which were partially lost over time in both groups. Discussion. These data indicate that increased training intensity increases the rate of functional improvements per time and per training session following ischemic insult. Thus, training intensity is an important variable to consider in efforts to optimize rehabilitation efficacy.

[1]  T. Jones,et al.  Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: Enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats , 2003, Neurological research.

[2]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2009, Circulation.

[3]  Mayhew Tm,et al.  The cerebrum and cerebellum of the fixed human brain: efficient and unbiased estimates of volumes and cortical surface areas. , 1989 .

[4]  T. Jones,et al.  Post-stroke protection from maladaptive effects of learning with the non-paretic forelimb by bimanual home cage experience in C57BL/6 mice , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  J. Kleim,et al.  The organization of the forelimb representation of the C57BL/6 mouse motor cortex as defined by intracortical microstimulation and cytoarchitecture. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Kelly A. Tennant,et al.  Sensorimotor behavioral effects of endothelin-1 induced small cortical infarcts in C57BL/6 mice , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  T. Jones,et al.  Abnormalities in skilled reaching movements are improved by peripheral anesthetization of the less-affected forelimb after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  S. Yamane,et al.  Effects of motor training on the recovery of manual dexterity after primary motor cortex lesion in macaque monkeys. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  T. Yan,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for promoting motor recovery of the upper extremity after stroke. , 2011, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.

[10]  Ian Q Whishaw,et al.  The pasta matrix reaching task: a simple test for measuring skilled reaching distance, direction, and dexterity in rats , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  T. Jones,et al.  Contralesional neural plasticity and functional changes in the less-affected forelimb after large and small cortical infarcts in rats , 2006, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  T M Mayhew,et al.  A review of recent advances in stereology for quantifying neural structure , 1992, Journal of neurocytology.

[13]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[14]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity Subserving Motor Skill Learning , 2011, Neuron.

[15]  Theresa A. Jones,et al.  Skill learning induced plasticity of motor cortical representations is time and age-dependent , 2012, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[16]  T. Murphy,et al.  Automated light-based mapping of motor cortex by photoactivation of channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice , 2009, Nature Methods.

[17]  J. Kleim,et al.  Motor training induces experience-specific patterns of plasticity across motor cortex and spinal cord. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Impairments in Skilled Reaching in the Mouse (Mus musculus) After a Focal Motor Cortex Stroke , 2002, Stroke.

[19]  T. Jones,et al.  Training the "less-affected" forelimb after unilateral cortical infarcts interferes with functional recovery of the impaired forelimb in rats. , 2005, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[20]  T. Jones,et al.  Behavioral and neuroplastic effects of focal endothelin-1 induced sensorimotor cortex lesions , 2004, Neuroscience.

[21]  Jeff Biernaskie,et al.  Enriched Rehabilitative Training Promotes Improved Forelimb Motor Function and Enhanced Dendritic Growth after Focal Ischemic Injury , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery. , 2005, Seminars in neurology.

[23]  T. Jones,et al.  Motor Skill Training, but not Voluntary Exercise, Improves Skilled Reaching After Unilateral Ischemic Lesions of the Sensorimotor Cortex in Rats , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  R. Nudo,et al.  Recovery of motor function after focal cortical injury in primates: compensatory movement patterns used during rehabilitative training. , 1998, Somatosensory & motor research.

[25]  C. Sherwin,et al.  Behaviour of laboratory mice in different housing conditions when allowed to self-administer an anxiolytic , 2006, Laboratory animals.

[26]  J. Kleim,et al.  Rat models of upper extremity impairment in stroke. , 2007, ILAR journal.

[27]  Portable Neurorobotics for the Severely Affected Arm in Chronic Stroke: A Case Study , 2011, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[28]  T. Jones,et al.  Unilateral Sensorimotor Cortex Lesions in Adult Rats Facilitate Motor Skill Learning with the “Unaffected” Forelimb and Training-Induced Dendritic Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  T. Jones,et al.  d-Amphetamine enhances skilled reaching after ischemic cortical lesions in rats , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  Ian Q Whishaw,et al.  Loss of the innate cortical engram for action patterns used in skilled reaching and the development of behavioral compensation following motor cortex lesions in the rat , 2000, Neuropharmacology.

[31]  Theresa A. Jones,et al.  The Vermicelli Handling Test: A simple quantitative measure of dexterous forepaw function in rats , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  T. Jones,et al.  Unilateral ischemic sensorimotor cortical damage in female rats: forelimb behavioral effects and dendritic structural plasticity in the contralateral homotopic cortex , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[33]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[34]  Mariam Alaverdashvili,et al.  A behavioral method for identifying recovery and compensation: Hand use in a preclinical stroke model using the single pellet reaching task , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[35]  D. Corbett,et al.  Efficacy of Rehabilitative Experience Declines with Time after Focal Ischemic Brain Injury , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Kleim,et al.  Age-Dependent Reorganization of Peri-Infarct “Premotor” Cortex With Task-Specific Rehabilitative Training in Mice , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[37]  S. Kranz.  Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Subjects: Relationships between the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains , 2012 .

[38]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[39]  T M Mayhew,et al.  The cerebrum and cerebellum of the fixed human brain: efficient and unbiased estimates of volumes and cortical surface areas. , 1989, Journal of anatomy.

[40]  M. J. Hall,et al.  Hospitalization for stroke in U.S. hospitals, 1989-2009. , 2012, NCHS data brief.

[41]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Getting Neurorehabilitation Right , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[42]  Abigail L. Smith,et al.  Modifications to husbandry and housing conditions of laboratory rodents for improved well-being. , 2005, ILAR journal.

[43]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2012, Circulation.

[44]  D. Corbett,et al.  A Critical Threshold of Rehabilitation Involving Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Is Required for Poststroke Recovery , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[45]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  The impairments in reaching and the movements of compensation in rats with motor cortex lesions: an endpoint, videorecording, and movement notation analysis , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[46]  I. Brunner,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity motor function post stroke with regard to eligibility for constraint-induced movement therapy. , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[47]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Varieties of paw and digit movement during spontaneous food handling in rats: Postures, bimanual coordination, preferences, and the effect of forelimb cortex lesions , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[48]  H Asanuma,et al.  Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals. , 1997, Neuroreport.

[49]  D. Reisman,et al.  Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[50]  O. Lindvall,et al.  Neurogenesis after ischaemic brain insults , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[51]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Compensation aids skilled reaching in aging and in recovery from forelimb motor cortex stroke in the rat , 2010, Neuroscience.