Genetic Complexity and Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Yeast Morphological Traits

Functional genomics relies on two essential parameters: the sensitivity of phenotypic measures and the power to detect genomic perturbations that cause phenotypic variations. In model organisms, two types of perturbations are widely used. Artificial mutations can be introduced in virtually any gene and allow the systematic analysis of gene function via mutants fitness. Alternatively, natural genetic variations can be associated to particular phenotypes via genetic mapping. However, the access to genome manipulation and breeding provided by model organisms is sometimes counterbalanced by phenotyping limitations. Here we investigated the natural genetic diversity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cellular morphology using a very sensitive high-throughput imaging platform. We quantified 501 morphological parameters in over 50,000 yeast cells from a cross between two wild-type divergent backgrounds. Extensive morphological differences were found between these backgrounds. The genetic architecture of the traits was complex, with evidence of both epistasis and transgressive segregation. We mapped quantitative trait loci (QTL) for 67 traits and discovered 364 correlations between traits segregation and inheritance of gene expression levels. We validated one QTL by the replacement of a single base in the genome. This study illustrates the natural diversity and complexity of cellular traits among natural yeast strains and provides an ideal framework for a genetical genomics dissection of multiple traits. Our results did not overlap with results previously obtained from systematic deletion strains, showing that both approaches are necessary for the functional exploration of genomes.

[1]  T. Kuroiwa,et al.  Fluorescence microscopic studies of mitochondrial nucleoids during meiosis and sporulation in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1984, Journal of cell science.

[2]  Nengjun Yi,et al.  The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[3]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Harnessing Natural Diversity to Probe Metabolic Pathways , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[4]  John M. Hancock,et al.  Understanding Mammalian Genetic Systems: The Challenge of Phenotyping in the Mouse , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[5]  R. Stoughton,et al.  Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man , 2003, Nature.

[6]  Taro L. Saito,et al.  High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Trudy F C Mackay,et al.  The genetic architecture of quantitative traits: lessons from Drosophila. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[8]  A. Bretscher,et al.  Polarization of cell growth in yeast. I. Establishment and maintenance of polarity states. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[9]  Daniel R. Richards,et al.  Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome. , 1998, Science.

[10]  C. Molony,et al.  Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression , 2004, Nature.

[11]  Cora Styles,et al.  Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of the FLO Gene Family Generates Cell-Surface Variation in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[12]  J. Boeke,et al.  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR‐mediated gene disruption and other applications , 1998, Yeast.

[13]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Evidence for Domesticated and Wild Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[14]  John D. Storey,et al.  Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast , 2005, Nature.

[15]  Rachel B. Brem,et al.  The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  R. Myers,et al.  Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  Margit Burmeister,et al.  Genetical genomics: combining genetics with gene expression analysis. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[18]  Leonid Kruglyak,et al.  Telomere Length as a Quantitative Trait: Genome-Wide Survey and Genetic Mapping of Telomere Length-Control Genes in Yeast , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[19]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Methodological aspects of the genetic dissection of gene expression , 2005, Bioinform..

[20]  Daniel R. Richards,et al.  Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast , 2002, Nature.

[21]  L. Pon,et al.  Mitochondrial inheritance: cell cycle and actin cable dependence of polarized mitochondrial movements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[22]  S. Haggarty,et al.  Revealing complex traits with small molecules and naturally recombinant yeast strains. , 2006, Chemistry & biology.

[23]  Martin S. Taylor,et al.  Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[24]  J. Castle,et al.  An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[25]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Transcriptional Regulation in Budding Yeast , 2002, Science.

[26]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative trait loci mapped to single-nucleotide resolution in yeast , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[27]  The Mouse Phenotype Database Integration Consortium,et al.  The European dimension for the mouse genome mutagenesis program , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Rachel B. Brem,et al.  Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors , 2003, Nature Genetics.