Contribution of human melanopsin retinal ganglion cells to steady-state pupil responses

The recent discovery of melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells (mRGCs) has led to a fundamental reassessment of non-image forming processing, such as circadian photoentrainment and the pupillary light reflex. In the conventional view of retinal physiology, rods and cones were assumed to be the only photoreceptors in the eye and were, therefore, considered responsible for non-image processing. However, signals from mRGCs contribute to this non-image forming processing along with cone-mediated luminance signals; although both signals contribute, it is unclear how these signals are summed. We designed and built a novel multi-primary stimulation system to stimulate mRGCs independently of other photoreceptors using a silent-substitution technique within a bright steady background. The system allows direct measurements of pupillary functions for mRGCs and cones. We observed a significant change in steady-state pupil diameter when we varied the excitation of mRGC alone, with no change in luminance and colour. Furthermore, the change in pupil diameter induced by mRGCs was larger than that induced by a variation in luminance alone: that is, for a bright steady background, the mRGC signals contribute to the pupillary pathway by a factor of three times more than the L- and M-cone signals.

[1]  Françoise Viénot,et al.  Kruithof's rule revisited using LED illumination , 2009 .

[2]  Eiji Kimura,et al.  Pupillary correlates of light-evoked melanopsin activity in humans , 2008, Vision Research.

[3]  H. Dartnall,et al.  The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. , 1953, British medical bulletin.

[4]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Human and macaque pupil responses driven by melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells , 2007, Vision Research.

[5]  Bruce F O'Hara,et al.  Role of Melanopsin in Circadian Responses to Light , 2002, Science.

[6]  M. Biel,et al.  Melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice , 2003, Nature.

[7]  B. Gilmartin,et al.  A linear chromatic mechanism drives the pupillary response , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  A. Stockman,et al.  The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype , 2000, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Stockman,et al.  The spectral sensitivity of the human short-wavelength sensitive cones derived from thresholds and color matches , 1999, Vision Research.

[10]  S. Shioiri,et al.  Two distinct cone-opponent processes in the L+M luminance pathway , 2007, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Moseley,et al.  Short-Wavelength Light Sensitivity of Circadian, Pupillary, and Visual Awareness in Humans Lacking an Outer Retina , 2007, Current Biology.

[12]  S. Berman,et al.  A new retinal photoreceptor should affect lighting practice , 2008 .

[13]  Aki Kawasaki,et al.  Chromatic pupil responses: preferential activation of the melanopsin-mediated versus outer photoreceptor-mediated pupil light reflex. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[14]  N. Mrosovsky,et al.  Impaired Masking Responses to Light in Melanopsin‐Knockout Mice , 2003, Chronobiology International.

[15]  Philippe Denis,et al.  Melanopsin Bistability: A Fly's Eye Technology in the Human Retina , 2009, PloS one.

[16]  Satchidananda Panda,et al.  Melanopsin (Opn4) Requirement for Normal Light-Induced Circadian Phase Shifting , 2002, Science.

[17]  M. Alpern,et al.  The effect of bleaching and backgrounds on pupil size. , 1972, Vision research.

[18]  P. Walraven.  Fundamental chromaticity diagram with physiological axes , 1999 .

[19]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN , 2005, Nature.

[20]  R. Hansen,et al.  Pupillary changes during dark adaptation in human infants. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Robert M. Boynton,et al.  Chromatic difference steps of moderate size measured along theoretically critical axes , 1980 .

[22]  K. Donner,et al.  In search of the visual pigment template , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[23]  Robert J. Lucas,et al.  Characterization of an ocular photopigment capable of driving pupillary constriction in mice , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Dacey,et al.  Dendritic field size and morphology of midget and parasol ganglion cells of the human retina. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  The design and use of a cone chromaticity space: A tutorial , 1996 .

[26]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  The influence of intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells on the spectral sensitivity and response dynamics of the human pupillary light reflex , 2010, Vision Research.

[27]  Takeru Watanabe,et al.  A new superbright LED stimulator: Photodiode-feedback design for linearizing and stabilizing emitted light , 1992, Vision Research.

[28]  Satchidananda Panda,et al.  Melanopsin Is Required for Non-Image-Forming Photic Responses in Blind Mice , 2003, Science.

[29]  W. Stiles,et al.  Saturation of the Rod Mechanism of the Retina at High Levels of Stimulation , 1954 .

[30]  K. Yau,et al.  Diminished Pupillary Light Reflex at High Irradiances in Melanopsin-Knockout Mice , 2003, Science.