The Chicago classification of motility disorders: an update.

[1]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit. , 2014, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[2]  A. Bredenoord,et al.  Normal values for solid‐state esophageal high‐resolution manometry in a European population; an overview of all current metrics , 2014, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[3]  N. Rommel,et al.  Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function , 2014, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[4]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Lack of Correlation Between HRM Metrics and Symptoms During the Manometric Protocol , 2014, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[5]  A. Bredenoord,et al.  Water-perfused esophageal high-resolution manometry: normal values and validation. , 2014, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[6]  M. Fox,et al.  Assessment of esophageal dysfunction and symptoms during and after a standardized test meal: development and clinical validation of a new methodology utilizing high‐resolution manometry , 2014, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[7]  C. Gyawali,et al.  Multiple Rapid Swallow Responses During Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Reflect Esophageal Body Peristaltic Reserve , 2013, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[8]  J. Peters,et al.  Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high-resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers. , 2013, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[9]  P. Siersema,et al.  Normal values for esophageal high‐resolution manometry , 2013, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[10]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Partial recovery of peristalsis after myotomy for achalasia: more the rule than the exception. , 2013, JAMA surgery.

[11]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  High-Resolution Manometry Correlates of Ineffective Esophageal Motility , 2012, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Localizing the contractile deceleration point (CDP) in patients with abnormal esophageal pressure topography , 2012, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[13]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders , 2012, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[14]  C. Gyawali,et al.  Fragmented esophageal smooth muscle contraction segments on high resolution manometry: a marker of esophageal hypomotility , 2012, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[15]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Refining the criterion for an abnormal Integrated Relaxation Pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model , 2012, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[16]  C. Gyawali,et al.  Analysis of Intersegmental Trough and Proximal Latency of Smooth Muscle Contraction Using High-resolution Esophageal Manometry , 2012, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[17]  M. Fox,et al.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography 1 , 2012, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[18]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Phenotypes and Clinical Context of Hypercontractility in High-Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography (EPT) , 2012, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[19]  C. Gyawali,et al.  Learners favour high resolution oesophageal manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventional line tracings , 2011, Gut.

[20]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Distal esophageal spasm in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[21]  M. Fox,et al.  Normative values and inter‐observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high‐resolution manometry , 2011, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[22]  M. Fox,et al.  Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro‐esophageal reflux disease , 2011, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[23]  J. Dent,et al.  A method to objectively assess swallow function in adults with suspected aspiration. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[24]  Zhiyue Lin,et al.  Weak Peristalsis in Esophageal Pressure Topography: Classification and Association With Dysphagia , 2011, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[25]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  The contractile deceleration point: an important physiologic landmark on oesophageal pressure topography , 2010, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[26]  A. Bredenoord,et al.  High‐resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities , 2009, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[27]  J. Tack,et al.  Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry , 2009, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[28]  N. Talley.  Achalasia: A New Clinically Relevant Classification by High-Resolution Manometry , 2009 .

[29]  A. Hila,et al.  Revised Criterion for Diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Is Associated With More Frequent Dysphagia and Greater Bolus Transit Abnormalities , 2008, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[30]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[31]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  High-Resolution Manometry of the EGJ: An Analysis of Crural Diaphragm Function in GERD , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[32]  Peter J Kahrilas,et al.  Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[33]  A. Bredenoord,et al.  Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux. , 2006, Gastroenterology.