Optimal search strategies for identifying mental health content in MEDLINE: an analytic survey

ObjectiveGeneral practitioners, mental health practitioners, and researchers wishing to retrieve the best current research evidence in the content area of mental health may have a difficult time when searching large electronic databases such as MEDLINE. When MEDLINE is searched unaided, key articles are often missed while retrieving many articles that are irrelevant to the search. The objectives of this study were to develop optimal search strategies to detect articles with mental health content and to determine the effect of combining mental health content search strategies with methodologic search strategies calibrated to detect the best studies of treatment.MethodAn analytic survey was conducted, comparing hand searches of 29 journals with retrievals from MEDLINE for 3,395 candidate search terms and 11,317 combinations. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of the search strategies were calculated.Results3,277 (26.8%) of the 12,233 articles classified in the 29 journals were considered to be of interest to the discipline area of mental health. Search term combinations reached peak sensitivities of 98.4% with specificity at 50.0%, whereas combinations of search terms to optimize specificity reached peak specificities of 97.1% with sensitivity at 51.7%. Combining content search strategies with methodologic search strategies for treatment led to improved precision: substantive decreases in the number of articles that needed to be sorted through in order to find target articles.ConclusionEmpirically derived search strategies can achieve high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving mental health content from MEDLINE. Combining content search strategies with methodologic search strategies led to more precise searches.

[1]  R. Haynes,et al.  Medline : analytical survey scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Optimal search strategies for retrieving , 2004 .

[2]  A. Marson,et al.  How Easy are Randomized Controlled Trials in Epilepsy to Find on Medline? The Sensitivity and Precision of Two Medline Searches , 1996, Epilepsia.

[3]  Jadad Ar,et al.  A high-yield strategy to identify randomized controlled trials for systematic reviews. , 1993 .

[4]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Causation Studies in MEDLINE , 2003, AMIA.

[5]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Sound Clinical Prediction Studies in MEDLINE , 2003, AMIA.

[6]  Sam Vincent,et al.  Clinical Evidence diagnosis: Developing a sensitive search strategy to retrieve diagnostic studies on deep vein thrombosis: a pragmatic approach. , 2003, Health information and libraries journal.

[7]  R. Haynes,et al.  Optimal search strategies for detecting health services research studies in MEDLINE , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[8]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in MEDLINE , 2004, MedInfo.

[9]  R. Haynes,et al.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  BMC Medicine BioMed Central , 2003 .

[11]  K. Shojania,et al.  Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. , 2001, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[12]  Lucas M. Bachmann,et al.  Research Paper: Identifying Diagnostic Studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the Number Needed to Read , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  G. Dinant,et al.  Identifying relevant diagnostic studies in MEDLINE. The diagnostic value of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and dipstick as an example. , 1997, Family practice.

[14]  Khalid S. Khan,et al.  A Two‐Term MEDLINE Search Strategy for Identifying Randomized Trials in Obstetrics and Gynecology , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  Karen A Robinson,et al.  Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  K. A. McKibbon,et al.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  C. Adams,et al.  An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care , 1994, Psychological Medicine.

[18]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Enhancing Retrieval of Best Evidence for Health Care from Bibliographic Databases: Calibration of the Hand Search of the Literature , 2001, MedInfo.

[19]  H B Dumbrigue,et al.  Assessment of MEDLINE search strategies for randomized controlled trials in prosthodontics. , 2000, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[20]  M. Ebell,et al.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  P D Bezemer,et al.  Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.