Feasibility study of an attention training application for older adults.

BACKGROUND Technology-based attention training has demonstrated promise in its potential to improve cognitive functioning in older people. Developing mobile applications, with older users specifically in mind, may support future dissemination of these interventions and integration into daily life. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this pilot study was to test the feasibility of an Attention Training Application (ATA) for community-dwelling older adults using mobile technology. DESIGN A descriptive, mixed-methods design was used to capture older adults' feedback on the usability and acceptability of the ATA. METHODS A convenience sample of older adults (n = 9) from two independent living facilities participated in a 2-hour training and practice session with the ATA. Participants were given personally tailored instructions for using the mobile device and the ATA specifically. Following a practice session, participants provided ratings on multiple components of the ATA and completed an audio-recorded, semi-structured interview to provide detailed descriptions of their experience and perceptions. An iterative process of content analysis was used to characterise the open-ended responses. RESULTS Participants rated the ATA favourably overall on several 0-10 scales including likeability [8.5 (1.6)], interest [8.8 (2.3)] and satisfaction [8.2 (1.9)]. The qualitative analyses revealed several issues relevant to the feasibility of the ATA among older people including the importance of the technological background of the user, limiting negative feedback, challenges with the touch screen interface, personal preferences for challenge, extending the practice period and the difficulty of the dual-task condition. CONCLUSIONS The use of the ATA is feasible in the older adult population. Future development should specifically consider personal characteristics as well as preferences to maximise usability and acceptability among older people. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Older adults enjoyed the ATA. This opens doors to user-friendly technological interventions that may be effective in assisting older adults maintain and possibly even improve their cognitive function.

[1]  A. Jerant,et al.  Five factor model personality factors moderated the effects of an intervention to enhance chronic disease management self-efficacy. , 2009, British journal of health psychology.

[2]  Sajay Arthanat,et al.  A home-based individualized information communication technology training program for older adults: a demonstration of effectiveness and value , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[3]  Victoria Traynor,et al.  Computerized and virtual reality cognitive training for individuals at high risk of cognitive decline: systematic review of the literature. , 2015, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[4]  Allison N. Kurti,et al.  Physical activity behavior, barriers to activity, and opinions about a smartphone-based physical activity intervention among rural residents. , 2015, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[5]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  T. Judge,et al.  Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  M. Conner,et al.  Conscientiousness and the intention-behavior relationship: predicting exercise behavior. , 2007, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[8]  B. Alescio-Lautier,et al.  Positive effects of computer-based cognitive training in adults with mild cognitive impairment , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Dual n-back training increases the capacity of the focus of attention , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Cinzia Brunelli,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making a Wireless Health Outcomes Monitoring System (whoms): Development and Field Testing with Cancer Patients Using Mobile Phones , 2022 .

[11]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis , 2008, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[12]  B. Eppinger,et al.  Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Jeanine M. Parisi,et al.  Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  N. Hill,et al.  Personality as a moderator of cognitive stimulation in older adults at high risk for cognitive decline. , 2014, Research in gerontological nursing.

[15]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  The Relationship between N-Back Performance and Matrix Reasoning--Implications for Training and Transfer. , 2010 .

[16]  P. Duberstein,et al.  Personality traits, education, and health-related quality of life among older adult primary care patients. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[17]  Carl K. Chang,et al.  Perceptions of technology among older adults. , 2013, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[18]  Tara O’Brien,et al.  Acceptability of wristband activity trackers among community dwelling older adults. , 2015, Geriatric nursing.

[19]  I. Nimmo-Smith,et al.  The structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[20]  M. C. Reid,et al.  Older adults are mobile too!Identifying the barriers and facilitators to older adults’ use of mHealth for pain management , 2013, BMC Geriatrics.

[21]  Yuqing Guo,et al.  Attitudes and Preferences on the Use of Mobile Health Technology and Health Games for Self-Management: Interviews With Older Adults on Anticoagulation Therapy , 2014, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[22]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  A Potential Spatial Working Memory Training Task to Improve Both Episodic Memory and Fluid Intelligence , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  R. Woods,et al.  Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease: A review , 2004 .

[24]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  David A Loewenstein,et al.  Nonpharmacological Cognitive Interventions in Aging and Dementia , 2007, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.