Effect of vibratory stimulation training on maximal force and flexibility.

In this study, we investigated a new method of training for maximal strength and flexibility, which included exertion with superimposed vibration (vibratory stimulation, VS) on target muscles. Twenty-eight male athletes were divided into three groups, and trained three times a week for 3 weeks in one of the following conditions: (A) conventional exercises for strength of the arms and VS stretching exercises for the legs; (B) VS strength exercises for the arms and conventional stretching exercises for the legs; (C) irrelevant training (control group). The vibration was applied at 44 Hz while its amplitude was 3 mm. The effect of training was evaluated by means of isotonic maximal force, heel-to-heel length in the two-leg split across, and flex-and-reach test for body flexion. The VS strength training yielded an average increase in isotonic maximal strength of 49.8%, compared with an average gain of 16% with conventional training, while no gain was observed for the control group. The VS flexibility training resulted in an average gain in the legs split of 14.5 cm compared with 4.1 cm for the conventional training and 2 cm for the control groups, respectively. The ANOVA revealed significant pre-post training effects and an interaction between pre-post training and 'treatment' effects (P < 0.001) for the isotonic maximal force and both flexibility tests. It was concluded that superimposed vibrations applied for short periods allow for increased gains in maximal strength and flexibility.

[1]  T. Kasamatsu,et al.  Epidemiological study of vibration syndrome in response to total hand-tool operating time. , 1983, British journal of industrial medicine.

[2]  L. Jorfeldt,et al.  Influence of vibration on endurance of maximal isometric contraction. , 1989, Clinical physiology.

[3]  J. Lance,et al.  Differential effects on tonic and phasic reflex mechanisms produced by vibration of muscles in man. , 1966, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  Nazarov,et al.  Development of athlete’s strength abilities by means of biomechanical stimulation method , 1985 .

[5]  G. Eklund,et al.  Normal variability of tonic vibration reflexes in man. , 1966, Experimental neurology.

[6]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Transmission of vibration in the hand-arm system with special reference to changes in compression force and acceleration. , 1976, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  E. Kugelberg,et al.  Motor unit activity in the human extraocular muscles , 1953 .

[8]  E. Adrian,et al.  The discharge of impulses in motor nerve fibres , 1929, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  T J Armstrong,et al.  Ergonomics and the effects of vibration in hand-intensive work. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[10]  P. Matthews,et al.  The reflex excitation of the soleus muscle of the decerebrate cat caused by vibration applied to its tendon , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  D. Ottoson,et al.  Pain alleviation by vibratory stimulation , 1984, Pain.

[12]  B. Bishop Vibratory Stimulation: Part I. Neurophysiology of Motor Responses Evoked by Vibratory Stimulation , 1974 .

[13]  I Pyykkö,et al.  Clinical aspects of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. A review. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[14]  R. Granit The basis of motor control , 1970 .

[15]  A J Brammer,et al.  Dose-response relationships for hand-transmitted vibration. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[16]  E. L. Fox,et al.  The physiological basis of physical education and athletics , 1971 .

[17]  S. Watanabe,et al.  Vibratory stimulation of muscles and stretch reflex. , 1970, The Japanese journal of physiology.