Case Study: Improving Real-Time Stage Forecasting Muskingum Model by Incorporating the Rating Curve Model

Analysis of forecasts obtained by a forecasting model called STAFOM, a Muskingum-type model for real-time application, shows that the model provides accurate forecast stage estimates for most of the selected case studies and flood events in the Upper-Middle Tiber River basin in central Italy. However, three main issues affected STAFOM: (1) its kinematic nature, (2) the lateral inflows representation, and (3) the occurrence of sudden fluctuations in water levels observed at the ends of the equipped river reach. Therefore, this simple stage forecasting model is hereby improved by incorporating a methodology relating local stage and remote discharge along river channels. This latter procedure, based on the rating curve model (RCM), is capable of reconstructing a discharge hydrograph at a river site where only the stage is monitored, while the discharge is recorded at another section located far away and for which a significant lateral inflow contribution is expected. Application of the new model, named STAFOM-RCM, to several flood events that occurred along four equipped river reaches of the Upper-Middle Tiber River basin, shows that it improves the stage forecast accuracy both in peak and stage hydrograph primarily for long river reaches, thus allowing consideration of a longer forecast lead time; and hence, avoiding the use of the old two-connecting river branch scheme that amplified the fluctuations in observed water levels. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000345. © 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers. CE Database subject headings: Floods; Forecasting; Inflow; Case studies. Author keywords: Real time; Flood forecasting; Lateral Inflows; Muskingum method; Adaptive procedure.

[1]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Real‐time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 2. Applications and results , 1980 .

[2]  Chao-Lin Chiu.  Application of Entropy Concept in Open‐Channel Flow Study , 1991 .

[3]  Thomas N. Keefer,et al.  Multiple Linearization Flow Routing Model , 1974 .

[4]  Roland K. Price,et al.  An optimized routing model for flood forecasting , 2009 .

[5]  Marco Franchini,et al.  Rating curve estimation using local stages, upstream discharge data and a simplified hydraulic model , 1999 .

[6]  Marco Franchini,et al.  A flood routing Muskingum type simulation and forecasting model based on level data alone , 1994 .

[7]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Accuracy of kinematic wave and diffusion wave for spatial‐varying rainfall excess over a plane , 2002 .

[8]  Paolo Lamberti,et al.  Flood propagation models for real-time forecasting , 1996 .

[9]  Luca Brocca,et al.  On the Lateral Inflows Assessment Within a Real-Time Stage Monitoring Addressed to Flood Forecasting , 2008 .

[10]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[11]  V. Singh,et al.  Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with Significant Lateral Inflow , 2005 .

[12]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  A real-time stage Muskingum forecasting model for a site without rating curve , 2006 .

[13]  Gary W. Brunner,et al.  HEC-RAS River Analysis System. Hydraulic Reference Manual. Version 1.0. , 1995 .

[14]  T. Moramarco,et al.  On the practical applicability of the VPMS routing method for rating curve development at ungauged river sites , 2010 .

[15]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  SIMPLE METHOD FOR RELATING LOCAL STAGE AND REMOTE DISCHARGE , 2001 .

[16]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Predictive uncertainty assessment in real time flood forecasting , 2009 .

[17]  T. O'donnell.  A direct three-parameter Muskingum procedure incorporating lateral inflow / Methode directe de Muskingum a trois parametres avec prise en compte des apports lateraux , 1985 .

[18]  D. B. Simons,et al.  Applicability of kinematic and diffusion models. , 1978 .

[19]  D. W. Reed.  A review of British flood forecasting practice , 1984 .

[20]  T. Moramarco,et al.  A methodology for discharge estimation and rating curve development at ungauged river sites , 2007 .

[21]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Uncertainties in environmental modelling and consequences for policy making , 2009 .

[22]  J.H.Daluz Vieira.  Conditions governing the use of approximations for the Saint-Vénant equations for shallow surface water flow , 1983 .

[23]  R. Moussa,et al.  Criteria for the choice of flood-routing methods in natural channels , 1996 .

[24]  Peter C. Young,et al.  A data based mechanistic approach to nonlinear flood routing and adaptive flood level forecasting , 2008 .

[25]  Renjie Xia,et al.  Relation between Mean and Maximum Velocities in a Natural River , 1997 .

[26]  Chao-Lin Chiu,et al.  Maximum Velocity and Regularities in Open-Channel Flow , 2002 .

[27]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Estimation of Mean Velocity in Natural Channels Based on Chiu's Velocity Distribution Equation , 2004 .

[28]  Tommaso Moramarco,et al.  Multilinear Muskingum Method for Stage-Hydrograph Routing in Compound Channels , 2009 .

[29]  Ezio Todini,et al.  A mass conservative and water storage consistent variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge approach , 2007 .

[30]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Accuracy of Kinematic Wave and Diffusion Wave Approximations for Flood Routing. I: Steady Analysis , 2008 .

[31]  Drainage Division,et al.  Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models , 1993 .