Interactions between hemodynamic responses to scanner acoustic noise and auditory stimuli in functional magnetic resonance imaging

In functional MRI experiments on the central auditory system, activation caused by acoustic scanner noise is a dominating factor that partially masks the hemodynamic response signals to sound stimuli of interest. In this study, the nonlinear interaction between auditory responses to single scans and those to tone stimuli was investigated. By using irregular acquisition repetition times and quasi‐random stimulus timings, the brain responses to pure tone stimuli were analyzed, as well as their interaction with scanner noise. The tone frequencies were chosen to match either the fundamental frequency of the scanner noise (730 Hz) or a region with little spectral power (4.70 kHz). The hemodynamic responses could be characterized by amplitudes of 1.3% and a time‐to‐peak of 4.0–4.5 sec in the absence of scanner noise. Interaction effects due to a single previous scan typically decreased the response magnitudes to 0.9%. The functional shape of the interaction was analyzed and could be described by a highly separable, dominantly symmetric interaction function that fairly agreed with a low‐order Volterra expansion of a simple nonlinear model. Interactions were stronger and more complex in shape when the spectral content of the tone stimulus and the scanner noise were more similar. Magn Reson Med 53:49–60, 2005. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Gore,et al.  Measurements of the Temporal fMRI Response of the Human Auditory Cortex to Trains of Tones , 1998, NeuroImage.

[2]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[3]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Amplitopicity of the Human Auditory Cortex: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[4]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[5]  A R Palmer,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  T. H. Le,et al.  Functional MRI of human auditory cortex using block and event‐related designs , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Steve C R Williams,et al.  Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Current strategies and future prospects , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Is It Tonotopy after All? , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  S A Shamma,et al.  Spectro-temporal response field characterization with dynamic ripples in ferret primary auditory cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Pim van Dijk,et al.  Spectrotemporal features of the auditory cortex: the activation in response to dynamic ripples , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Event-Related fMRI of the Auditory Cortex , 1998, NeuroImage.

[13]  R. Burkard,et al.  The functional anatomy of the normal human auditory system: responses to 0.5 and 4.0 kHz tones at varied intensities. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Adriaan Moelker,et al.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[16]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  Robert Turner,et al.  How Much Cortex Can a Vein Drain? Downstream Dilution of Activation-Related Cerebral Blood Oxygenation Changes , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  Josef Pfeuffer,et al.  Spatial dependence of the nonlinear BOLD response at short stimulus duration , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing Stimulus–Response Functions Using Nonlinear Regressors in Parametric fMRI Experiments , 1998, NeuroImage.

[21]  P. van Dijk,et al.  Simultaneous sampling of event‐related BOLD responses in auditory cortex and brainstem , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  A. Dale,et al.  Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing the Relationship between BOLD Contrast and Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements by Varying the Stimulus Presentation Rate , 1997, NeuroImage.

[24]  André Brechmann,et al.  Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: a low-noise fMRI study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Vincent J Schmithorst,et al.  Event‐related fMRI technique for auditory processing with hemodynamics unrelated to acoustic gradient noise , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  Amplitude and frequency-modulated stimuli activate common regions of human auditory cortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  The sound-level-dependent growth in the extent of fMRI activation in Heschl’s gyrus is different for low- and high-frequency tones , 2003, Hearing Research.

[29]  O. Zafiris,et al.  The Effect of Sequence Repeat Time on Auditory Cortex Stimulation During Phonetic Discrimination , 1998, NeuroImage.

[30]  Y Yang,et al.  A silent event‐related functional MRI technique for brain activation studies without interference of scanner acoustic noise , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[32]  Aysenil Belger,et al.  Hemodynamic correlates of stimulus repetition in the visual and auditory cortices: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  L. Jäncke,et al.  The time course of the BOLD response in the human auditory cortex to acoustic stimuli of different duration. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  P A Bandettini,et al.  Effects of stimulus rate on signal response during functional magnetic resonance imaging of auditory cortex. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[37]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[38]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[39]  G. Mangun,et al.  Tonotopy in human auditory cortex examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[40]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.