A digital subtraction radiography investigation of upper first molar proximal bone density changes in adolescents.

The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the ability of digital subtraction radiography to monitor changes in proximal bone density, adjacent to the upper first molars, in a group of adolescents using the Digora direct digital radiographic system to acquire images. For 57 adolescents, assessments of changes in probing attachment level at the mesio- and disto-buccal surfaces of both upper first molars and proximal crestal bone density using digital subtraction radiography were made. At the conclusion of this 21-month study attachment loss was identified in 34 (17%) of the 204 sites analysed. For sites with attachment loss a mean decrease in bone density equivalent to 5.51 mm3 aluminium (Al) was found compared to 2.96 mm3 Al for those without (p < 0.001). For the 17 subjects with attachment loss a mean equivalent to 4.66 mm3 Al was lost from the crestal bone compared with 2.56 mm3 Al for the 40 subjects without attachment loss (p < 0.01). The correlation between attachment loss and bone density changes was poor for both sites (r = 0.13), p = 0.067) and mean scores for subjects (r = 0.24, p = 0.069). A visual qualitative assessment of bone density change found that 70.6% of sites with attachment loss compared to 62.4% of those without had a decrease in crestal bone density. This study suggests that it is possible to monitor bone density changes in adolescents, with a developing dentition, using digital subtraction radiography. Further, it is suggested that conventional probing assessments of attachment level may underestimate the level of destructive periodontal disease in this age group.

[1]  H. Worthington,et al.  Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system. , 1997, Journal of Periodontal Research.

[2]  K Horner,et al.  The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  I. Wang,et al.  The effect of systemic flurbiprofen on bone supporting dental implants. , 1995, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  A Wenzel,et al.  Direct digital radiography in the dental office. , 1995, International dental journal.

[5]  E. Machtei,et al.  Studies on the relationship between changes in radiographic bone height and probing attachment. , 1994, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[6]  M S Reddy,et al.  Digital subtraction radiography. , 1993, Dental clinics of North America.

[7]  P. F. van der Stelt,et al.  Modern Radiographic Methods in the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease , 1993 .

[8]  A Wenzel,et al.  Digital subtraction radiography after stannous fluoride treatment for occlusal caries diagnosis. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[9]  M. Jeffcoat Radiographic Methods for the Detection of Progressive Alveolar Bone Loss. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[10]  P. Waite,et al.  Use of digital radiography to demonstrate the potential of naproxen as an adjunct in the treatment of rapidly progressive periodontitis. , 1991, Journal of periodontal research.

[11]  U Brägger,et al.  Remodelling of interdental alveolar bone after periodontal flap procedures assessed by means of computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA). , 1988, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  M S Reddy,et al.  Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. , 1987, Journal of periodontal research.

[13]  M. Lennon,et al.  A two-year longitudinal study of early periodontitis in 14- to 16-year-old schoolchildren. , 1986, Community dental health.

[14]  M. Lennon,et al.  The attachment level as a measure of early periodontitis. , 1984, Community dental health.