Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Driver,et al. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .
[2] Jeff Miller,et al. Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.
[3] A. Welford. THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .
[4] J. C. Johnston,et al. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .
[5] E. Donchin,et al. Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing , 1988, Biological Psychology.
[6] R. Ratcliff. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[7] P. Jolicoeur,et al. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[9] Saul Sternberg,et al. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .
[10] C. W. Telford. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .
[11] J. Brožek. Attention and Performance II. , 1971 .
[12] J. C. Johnston,et al. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .
[13] A. Ninio. The effect of first response complexity on the psychological refractory period: A reanalysis , 1975, Memory & cognition.
[14] H G Vaughan,et al. The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. , 1966, Vision research.
[15] Rolf Ulrich,et al. On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[16] L. Mulder,et al. Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] R Schweickert,et al. Critical-path scheduling of mental processes in a dual task. , 1980, Science.
[18] H. Pashler. Overlapping Mental Operations in Serial Performance with Preview , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[19] P. Fitts,et al. S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.
[20] D. Kahneman,et al. Attention and Effort , 1973 .
[21] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Motor Limitation in Dual-Task Processing Under Ballistic Movement Conditions , 2006, Psychological science.
[22] David E. Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .
[23] E. Benarroch. Executive Control , 2022, Neuroscience for Clinicians.
[24] N. Meiran. Modeling cognitive control in task-switching , 2000, Psychological research.
[25] S T Klapp,et al. Hesitations in manual tracking: a single-channel limit in response programming. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[26] A. Osman,et al. The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[27] A. T. Welford,et al. Evidence of a Single-Channel Decision Mechanism Limiting Performance in a Serial Reaction Task* , 1959 .
[28] C M Moore,et al. Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects of LRP onset. , 1995, Acta psychologica.
[29] D. Navon,et al. Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[30] P. Jaśkowski,et al. VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction-time distribution , 1990, Psychological research.
[31] P. McLeod. A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention , 1977 .
[32] M. Coles. Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.
[33] R De Jong,et al. An intention-activation account of residual switch costs , 2000 .
[34] H. Pashler,et al. Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: Graded capacity sharing or central postponement? , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.
[35] G. D. Logan. Task Switching , 2022 .
[36] A. Osman,et al. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.
[37] S. Kornblum. Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. , 1992 .
[38] D. Meyer,et al. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[39] Gordon D. Logan,et al. Dependence and Independence in Responding to Double Stimulation : A Comparison of Stop , Change , and Dual-Task Paradigms , 1986 .
[40] S. Luck. Sources of Dual-Task Interference: Evidence From Human Electrophysiology , 1998 .
[41] Chris Oriet,et al. Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] Steven W. Keele,et al. Attention and human performance , 1973 .
[43] R. D. de Jong,et al. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[44] E Ruthruff,et al. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[45] D. Kahneman,et al. Capacity Sharing and Refractoriness in Successive Reactions , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.
[46] W. Sommer,et al. Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[47] R. Proctor,et al. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[48] H. Pashler,et al. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[49] E Ruthruff,et al. Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[50] D E Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.
[51] S. Monsell,et al. Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .
[52] Jeff Miller,et al. Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. , 2001, Psychophysiology.
[53] Ann Reynolds,et al. The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[54] R S Nickerson,et al. Response Time to the Second of Two Successive Signals as a Function of Absolute and Relative Duration of Intersignal Interval , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.
[55] Torsten Schubert,et al. Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[56] P. Rabbitt. The effects of R-S interval duration on serial choice reaction time: preparation time or response monitoring time? , 1980 .
[57] J. C. Johnston,et al. Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .
[58] R. D. Gordon,et al. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.