Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998)

Mitchell (1987) conducted a self-paced reading experiment that showed that people experienced difficulty reading a noun phrase when it immediately followed an intransitive verb. From this, he argued for a two-stage theory of parsing, in which verb subcategorization information is initially ignored. In response, Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998) found no evidence to support this claim in an eye-tracking experiment and argued that Mitchell’s segmentation procedure distorted the parsing process. We report an eye-tracking experiment, in which materials similar to those in Adams et al., but with longer noun phrases, were used, that showed a pattern of difficulty similar to Mitchell’s findings. Hence, Mitchell’s results did not depend on the use of an artificial method of presentation. The results cast further doubt on the adequacy of constraint-based accounts of parsing.

[1]  Donald Mitchell,et al.  Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. , 1987 .

[2]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes , 1989 .

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[4]  M. Pickering,et al.  Influence of Connectives on Language Comprehension: Eye tracking Evidence for Incremental Interpretation , 1997 .

[5]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Modifier Attachment in Sentence Parsing: Evidence from Dutch , 1996 .

[6]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts , 2000 .

[7]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study , 1998 .

[8]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[9]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Clause Wrap-Up on Eye Movements during Reading , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[11]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[12]  Don C. Mitchell,et al.  Lexical guidance in sentence processing? , 1998 .

[13]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[14]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  C. Clifton,et al.  Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[17]  Martin Corley,et al.  Parsing Modifiers: The Case of Bare NP Adverbs , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[18]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  A. Garnham,et al.  Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context , 1992 .

[20]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[21]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Syntactic structure and the garden path , 1987 .

[22]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[23]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[24]  Lars Konieczny,et al.  The Role of Lexical Heads in Parsing: Evidence from German , 1997 .

[25]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and context : The case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives , 1998 .

[26]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The On-Line Effects of Semantic Context on Syntactic Processing , 1977 .

[27]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[28]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[29]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment , 1999 .

[30]  C. Clifton,et al.  Effects of the Focus Particle Only and Intrinsic Contrast on Comprehension of Reduced Relative Clauses , 2000 .

[31]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and context:: The case of by-phrases in passives. , 1998 .