Prolong cryopreservation duration negatively affects pregnancy outcomes of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers using an open-device system: A retrospective cohort study.

[1]  K. Hu,et al.  The association between embryo storage time and treatment success in women undergoing freeze-all embryo transfer. , 2022, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  Y. Ye,et al.  Long-term cryopreservation and frozen embryo transfer do not impact clinical and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of slow-frozen early-cleavage human embryos. , 2022, Zygote.

[3]  L. Rienzi,et al.  The effect of extended cryo-storage following vitrification on embryo competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[4]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, Human Reproduction.

[5]  Xiyuan Dong,et al.  The Impact of Embryo Storage Time on Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes and the Time Limit of Vitrification: A Retrospective Cohort Study , 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[6]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer are independent of cryo-storage duration. , 2021, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[7]  G. Hao,et al.  Prolonged Cryopreservation Negatively Affects Embryo Transfer Outcomes Following the Elective Freeze-All Strategy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study , 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[8]  He-feng Huang,et al.  Effect of embryo cryopreservation duration on pregnancy-related complications and birthweight after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study , 2021, Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease.

[9]  Xiuyu Hu,et al.  High grade trophectoderm is associated with monozygotic twinning in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer , 2021, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  E. Porcu,et al.  High-security closed devices are efficient and safe to protect human oocytes from potential risk of viral contamination during vitrification and storage especially in the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[11]  Y. Zeng,et al.  Optimal Endometrial Preparation Protocols for Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles by Maternal Age , 2020, Reproductive Sciences.

[12]  Haengseok Song,et al.  Does duration of cryostorage affect survival rate, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes? Large‐scale single‐center study of slush nitrogen (SN2) vitrified‐warmed blastocysts , 2020, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[13]  Qiuju Chen,et al.  The effect of storage time after vitrification on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among 24 698 patients following the first embryo transfer cycles. , 2020, Human reproduction.

[14]  K. Ahuja,et al.  Vitrification and the demise of fresh treatment cycles in ART. , 2020, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[15]  J. Vicente,et al.  Experimental Evidence Reveals Both Cross-Infection and Cross-Contamination Risk of Embryo Storage in Liquid Nitrogen Biobanks , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[16]  C. Barbosa,et al.  Expansion and herniation: evaluation of the best pregnancy rate predictor after quarter laser assisted hatching in frozen blastocyst transfers , 2020, JBRA assisted reproduction.

[17]  Canquan Zhou,et al.  Effect of embryo vitrification on the expression of brain tissue proteins in mouse offspring , 2020, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[18]  P. Humaidan,et al.  The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies , 2020, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[19]  Peilin Chen,et al.  Association between the number of top-quality blastocysts and live births after single blastocyst transfer in the first fresh or vitrified-warmed IVF/ICSI cycle. , 2020, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[20]  Canquan Zhou,et al.  Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis. , 2019, Human reproduction.

[21]  Peilin Chen,et al.  Clinical outcomes after transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen–thawed cleavage embryos: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study , 2019, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[22]  Hongcai Cai,et al.  Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes , 2018, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[23]  S. Roytrakul,et al.  Missing and overexpressing proteins in domestic cat oocytes following vitrification and in vitro maturation as revealed by proteomic analysis , 2018, Biological Research.

[24]  Xi-feng Xiao,et al.  Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo versus fresh embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2018, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[25]  A. Yabuuchi,et al.  Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. , 2018, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[26]  B. Kovačič,et al.  Artificial blastocoel collapse of human blastocysts before vitrification and its effect on re-expansion after warming - a prospective observational study using time-lapse microscopy. , 2017, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[27]  Roberta Maggiulli,et al.  Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance , 2016, Human reproduction update.

[28]  Hongzhan Zhang,et al.  Laser-assisted hatching improves clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed blastocysts developed from low-grade cleavage-stage embryos: a prospective randomized study. , 2014, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[29]  D. Schwerda,et al.  The time aspect in storing vitrified blastocysts: its impact on survival rate, implantation potential and babies born. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[30]  A. Aflatoonian,et al.  Duration of storage does not influence pregnancy outcome in cryopreserved human embryos , 2013, Iranian journal of reproductive medicine.

[31]  H. Mozdarani,et al.  Chromosome Abnormalities and Viability of Vitrified Eight-Cell Mouse Embryos at Presence of Two Different Cryoprotectants at Different Storage Durations , 2013, Cell journal.

[32]  P. Devroey,et al.  An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. , 2011, Human reproduction.

[33]  R. Lavara,et al.  Does storage time in LN2 influence survival and pregnancy outcome of vitrified rabbit embryos? , 2011, Theriogenology.

[34]  G. Ragni,et al.  Effects of two vitrification protocols on the developmental potential of human mature oocytes. , 2011, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[35]  S. Oehninger,et al.  Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[36]  Dong Ryul Lee,et al.  Long-term liquid nitrogen vapor storage of mouse embryos cryopreserved using vitrification or slow cooling. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[37]  K. Diedrich,et al.  Three years of routine vitrification of human zygotes: is it still fair to advocate slow-rate freezing? , 2007, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[38]  T. Otoi,et al.  Analysis of DNA fragmentation of porcine embryos exposed to cryoprotectants. , 2005, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[39]  D. Gardner,et al.  Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[40]  R. Frydman,et al.  Factors influencing the success rate of human embryo freezing in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program , 1987 .

[41]  G. M. Fahy,et al.  Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at −196 °C by vitrification , 1985, Nature.