Intercellular Delay Regulates the Collective Period of Repressively Coupled Gene Regulatory Oscillator Networks

Most biological rhythms are generated by a population of cellular oscillators coupled through intercellular signaling. Recent experimental evidence shows that the collective period may differ significantly from the autonomous period in the presence of intercellular delays. The phenomenon has been investigated using delay-coupled phase oscillators, but the proposed phase model contains no direct biological mechanism, which may weaken the model's reliability in unraveling biophysical principles. Based on a published gene regulatory oscillator model, we analyze the collective period of delay-coupled biological oscillators using the multivariable harmonic balance technique. We prove that, in contradiction to the common intuition that the collective period increases linearly with the coupling delay, the collective period turns out to be a periodic function of the intercellular delay. More surprisingly, the collective period may even decrease with the intercellular delay when the delay resides in certain regions. The collective period is given in a closed-form in terms of biochemical reaction constants and thus provides biological insights as well as guidance in synthetic-biological-oscillator design. Simulation results are given based on a segmentation clock model to confirm the theoretical predictions.

[1]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  537 Short Report , 2022 .

[2]  Julian Lewis,et al.  Setting the Tempo in Development: An Investigation of the Zebrafish Somite Clock Mechanism , 2007, PLoS biology.

[3]  Yongqiang Wang,et al.  The collective oscillation period of inter-coupled Goodwin oscillators , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[4]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Intercellular Coupling Regulates the Period of the Segmentation Clock , 2010, Current Biology.

[5]  N. Monk Oscillatory Expression of Hes1, p53, and NF-κB Driven by Transcriptional Time Delays , 2003, Current Biology.

[6]  A. Winfree The geometry of biological time , 1991 .

[7]  Lars Folke Olsen,et al.  Biochemical oscillations and cellular rhythms: The molecular bases of periodic and chaotic behaviour: Albert Goldbeter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. $99.95 (cloth), 605 + xxiv pp , 1997 .

[8]  A. Destexhe,et al.  Cortical Feedback Controls the Frequency and Synchrony of Oscillations in the Visual Thalamus , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  H. Schuster,et al.  Mutual Entrainment of Two Limit Cycle Oscillators with Time Delayed Coupling , 1989 .

[10]  Min Zhang,et al.  Calcium and glycolysis mediate multiple bursting modes in pancreatic islets. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[11]  D. Paul,et al.  Connexins, connexons, and intercellular communication. , 1996, Annual review of biochemistry.

[12]  Tetsuya Iwasaki,et al.  Multivariable harmonic balance for central pattern generators , 2008, Autom..

[13]  Tetsuya Iwasaki,et al.  Multivariable harmonic balance analysis of the neuronal oscillator for leech swimming , 2008, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Dunlap Molecular Bases for Circadian Clocks , 1999, Cell.

[15]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Feedback control of a master bacterial cell-cycle regulator. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Time Delay in the Kuramoto Model of Coupled Oscillators , 1998, chao-dyn/9807030.

[17]  Julian Lewis Autoinhibition with Transcriptional Delay A Simple Mechanism for the Zebrafish Somitogenesis Oscillator , 2003, Current Biology.

[18]  Ryoichiro Kageyama,et al.  Instability of Hes7 protein is crucial for the somite segmentation clock , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Shinji Hara,et al.  Biochemical oscillations in delayed negative cyclic feedback: Existence and profiles , 2013, Autom..

[20]  I Fischer,et al.  Synchronization of delay-coupled oscillators: a study of semiconductor lasers. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[21]  Ryoichiro Kageyama,et al.  Ultradian oscillations in Notch signaling regulate dynamic biological events. , 2010, Current topics in developmental biology.

[22]  John A. White,et al.  Short Conduction Delays Cause Inhibition Rather than Excitation to Favor Synchrony in Hybrid Neuronal Networks of the Entorhinal Cortex , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  M. G. Earl,et al.  Synchronization in oscillator networks with delayed coupling: a stability criterion. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Tetsuya Iwasaki,et al.  Matrix perturbation analysis for weakly coupled oscillators , 2009, Syst. Control. Lett..

[25]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Inhibitory feedback required for network oscillatory responses to communication but not prey stimuli , 2003, Nature.

[26]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Reduction of Complex Signaling Networks to a Representative Kernel , 2011, Science Signaling.

[27]  W. Friesen,et al.  What is a biological oscillator? , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[28]  Shinji Hara,et al.  Existence criteria of periodic oscillations in cyclic gene regulatory networks , 2011, Autom..