Competing Risks and Time‐Dependent Covariates

Time-dependent covariates are frequently encountered in regression analysis for event history data and competing risks. They are often essential predictors, which cannot be substituted by time-fixed covariates. This study briefly recalls the different types of time-dependent covariates, as classified by Kalbfleisch and Prentice [The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Wiley, New York, 2002] with the intent of clarifying their role and emphasizing the limitations in standard survival models and in the competing risks setting. If random (internal) time-dependent covariates are to be included in the modeling process, then it is still possible to estimate cause-specific hazards but prediction of the cumulative incidences and survival probabilities based on these is no longer feasible. This article aims at providing some possible strategies for dealing with these prediction problems. In a multi-state framework, a first approach uses internal covariates to define additional (intermediate) transient states in the competing risks model. Another approach is to apply the landmark analysis as described by van Houwelingen [Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2007, 34, 70-85] in order to study cumulative incidences at different subintervals of the entire study period. The final strategy is to extend the competing risks model by considering all the possible combinations between internal covariate levels and cause-specific events as final states. In all of those proposals, it is possible to estimate the changes/differences of the cumulative risks associated with simple internal covariates. An illustrative example based on bone marrow transplant data is presented in order to compare the different methods.

[1]  John P. Klein,et al.  Additive hazards Markov regression models illustrated with bone marrow transplant data , 2005 .

[2]  S Chevret,et al.  Misspecified regression model for the subdistribution hazard of a competing risk , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  V T Farewell,et al.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. , 1978, Biometrics.

[4]  Laurence L. George,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[5]  H. V. Houwelingen.  Dynamic Prediction by Landmarking in Event History Analysis , 2007 .

[6]  Susanne Rosthøj,et al.  Competing risks as a multi-state model , 2002, Statistical methods in medical research.

[7]  Mei‐jie Zhang,et al.  An Additive–Multiplicative Cox–Aalen Regression Model , 2002 .

[8]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[9]  J. Robins,et al.  Recovery of Information and Adjustment for Dependent Censoring Using Surrogate Markers , 1992 .

[10]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[11]  Martin Schumacher,et al.  Time-dependent covariates in the proportional subdistribution hazards model for competing risks. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[12]  Ren Johansen.  An Empirical Transition Matrix for Non-homogeneous Markov Chains Based on Censored Observations , 1978 .

[13]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Non- and semi-parametric estimation of transition probabilities from censored observation of a non-homogeneous Markov process , 1991 .

[14]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[15]  J. Klein,et al.  Statistical Models Based On Counting Process , 1994 .

[16]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data: Kalbfleisch/The Statistical , 2002 .

[17]  S Chevret,et al.  A Note on Including Time‐dependent Covariate in Regression Model for Competing Risks Data , 2005, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[18]  R. Gray.  A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk , 1988 .