The accuracy of accredited glaucoma optometrists in the diagnosis and treatment recommendation for glaucoma

Aim: To compare the diagnostic performance of accredited glaucoma optometrists (AGO) for both the diagnosis of glaucoma and the decision to treat with that of routine hospital eye care, against a reference standard of expert opinion (a consultant ophthalmologist with a special interest in glaucoma). Methods: A directly comparative, masked, performance study was undertaken in Grampian, Scotland. Of 165 people invited to participate, 100 (61%) were examined. People suspected of having glaucoma underwent, within one month, a full ophthalmic assessment in both a newly established community optometry led glaucoma management scheme and a consultant led hospital eye service. Results: Agreement between the AGO and the consultant ophthalmologist in diagnosing glaucoma was substantial (89%; κ = 0.703, SE = 0.083). Agreement over the need for treatment was also substantial (88%; κ = 0.716, SE = 0.076). The agreement between the trainee ophthalmologists and the consultant ophthalmologist in the diagnosis of glaucoma and treatment recommendation was moderate (83%, κ = 0.541, SE = 0.098, SE = 0.98; and 81%, κ = 0.553, SE = 0.90, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy of the optometrists in detecting glaucoma in this population was high for specificity (0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 0.97)) but lower for sensitivity (0.76 (0.57 to 0.89)). Performance was similar when accuracy was assessed for treatment recommendation (sensitivity 0.73 (0.57 to 0.85); specificity 0.96 (0.88 to 0.99)). The differences in sensitivity and specificity between AGO and junior ophthalmologist were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Community optometrists trained in glaucoma provided satisfactory decisions regarding diagnosis and initiation of treatment for glaucoma. With such additional training in glaucoma, optometrists are at least as accurate as junior ophthalmologists but some cases of glaucoma are missed.

[1]  J. Wild,et al.  Referral patterns to an ophthalmic outpatient clinic by general practitioners and ophthalmic opticians and the role of these professionals in screening for ocular disease. , 1988, BMJ.

[2]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  H. Quigley Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  C. Bunce,et al.  Agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists on clinical management decisions for patients with glaucoma , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  L. Hirsch Competing interests: none declared. , 2006 .

[6]  D. Easty,et al.  The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: outcome at follow up at 2 years , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  I. Murdoch,et al.  Is review of enriched populations the way forward for glaucoma case detection? , 2003, Eye.

[8]  I. Murdoch,et al.  Positive predictive value of optometrist‐initiated referrals for glaucoma , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  B. Bowling,et al.  Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  S. Cousens,et al.  Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial , 2004, Eye.

[11]  M. W. Tuck Referrals for suspected glaucoma: an International Glaucoma Association survey , 1991, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[12]  S. Vernon The changing pattern of glaucoma referrals by optometrists , 1998, Eye.

[13]  D. Henson,et al.  Community refinement of glaucoma referrals , 2003, Eye.

[14]  I. Murdoch,et al.  Glaucoma detection in the community: does ongoing training of optometrists have a lasting effect? , 2006, Eye.

[15]  C. O'brien,et al.  The diagnostic outcome of new glaucoma referrals , 1997, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  C. Bunce,et al.  Risk factors for late presentation in chronic glaucoma. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  T. Peters,et al.  The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  S A Vernon,et al.  Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice? , 2001, Eye.