Causal Belief Networks: Handling Uncertain Interventions

Eliciting the cause of an event will be easier if an agent can directly intervene on some variables by forcing them to take a specific value. The state of the target variable is therefore totally dependent of this external action and independent of its original causes. However in real world applications, performing such perfect interventions is not always feasible. In fact, an intervention can be uncertain in the sense that it may uncertainly occur. It can also have uncertain consequences which means that it may not succeed to put its target into one specific value. In this paper, we use the belief function theory to handle uncertain interventions that could have uncertain consequences. Augmented causal belief networks are used to model uncertain interventions.

[1]  Salem Benferhat,et al.  Inferring interventions in product-based possibilistic causal networks , 2011, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  S. Benferhat,et al.  On the modeling of causal belief networks , 2013, 2013 5th International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO).

[3]  Khaled Mellouli,et al.  Inference in directed evidential networks based on the transferable belief model , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  Salem Benferhat,et al.  Interventions and belief change in possibilistic graphical models , 2010, Artif. Intell..

[5]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[6]  Zied Elouedi,et al.  Modeling Interventions Using Belief Causal Networks , 2011, FLAIRS.

[7]  Zied Elouedi,et al.  Representing Belief Function Knowledge with Graphical Models , 2011, KSEM.

[8]  A. Farina,et al.  An Application of Evidential Networks to Threat Assessment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  Weiru Liu,et al.  Bridging Jeffrey's Rule, AGM Revision and Dempster Conditioning in the Theory of Evidence , 2011, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[10]  Zied Elouedi,et al.  Handling Interventions with Uncertain Consequences in Belief Causal Networks , 2012, IPMU.

[11]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  PRICAI 2004: Trends in Artificial Intelligence , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Philippe Weber,et al.  Bayesian networks inference algorithm to implement Dempster Shafer theory in reliability analysis , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[15]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[16]  Philippe Smets About Updating , 1991, UAI.

[17]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model for Quantified Belief Representation , 1998 .

[18]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Varieties of Causal Intervention , 2004, PRICAI.

[19]  Adnan Darwiche,et al.  Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks , 2009 .

[20]  R. Scheines,et al.  Interventions and Causal Inference , 2007, Philosophy of Science.

[21]  Hong Xu,et al.  Evidential Reasoning with Conditional Belief Functions , 1994, UAI.